SPY -0.23%
BND -0.10%
QQQ +0.56%
DIA -0.91%
VNQ +0.53%
GLD -0.16%
BTC -1.45%
AAPL -1.50%
GOOGL -0.70%
NVDA +0.40%
MSFT +1.06%
META -1.40%
AMZN -0.06%
TSLA +1.67%
UBER -3.21%
GS -1.35%
BAC -0.77%
JPM -1.25%
BRK.A -0.84%
COST -1.58%
XOM +1.41%
BABA -1.74%
WMT -1.01%
SPCX +2.38%
DIS -0.55%
F -2.44%
  • Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
NYPD officers pack up counterfeit goods from street vendors on Canal Street on April 09, 2026 Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

NY mom says police seized her 5 kids’ holiday gifts and $3,500 cash during Christmas Eve arrest — then gave the presents away

A single mother in New York says a 2024 Christmas Eve arrest cost her the more than $3,500 in cash she had on hand — and that police gave the gifts she bought for her five children away.

Andrea Smith-Taylor was staying at a domestic violence shelter with her children when she went shopping on Dec. 24 two years ago. She had purchased clothing, boots, jewelry and a PlayStation, filling two large shopping bags with Christmas presents for her kids, who are now 5, 6, 11, 14 and 18.

Advertisement

But before she could give her children their gifts, police arrested her and seized her cash and belongings, according to a new report by Gothamist. While her criminal case was subsequently dismissed and sealed, she says she never recovered what belonged to her and her family.

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Months later, an officer reportedly told her lawyer that the police department had donated the gifts “out of the Christmas spirit,” according to a lawsuit filed against New York City, the NYPD property clerk and Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch.

But the lawsuit also alleges that “the proceeds from such sales are directed, in whole or in part, to NYPD accounts, programs or initiatives, creating a direct financial incentive for the NYPD to withhold and dispose of personal property rather than return it.”

A lawsuit alleges a costly bureaucratic maze

Smith-Taylor is one of six plaintiffs in the proposed class-action lawsuit filed by Brooklyn Defender Services and law firm White & Case LLP. The complaint alleges that New York City’s process for returning confiscated belongings violates people’s due process rights and makes reclaiming property unnecessarily difficult.

“When I was arrested, the NYPD assured me that they would give my children the gifts I had just purchased for them for Christmas,” Andrea Smith-Taylor said in the lawsuit. “That didn’t happen. Even after my case was dismissed, when I tried to get them back, the NYPD told me they had no knowledge of their whereabouts. One officer said they donated my children’s gifts to ACS [Administration for Children’s Services], but ACS had no record of that. After months of searching, I had to tell my children their Christmas presents were gone. They were devastated.”

Police can seize belongings for several reasons, including during an arrest or when investigating suspected criminal activity. But the lawsuit claims that people attempting to recover their possessions often encounter confusing instructions, contradictory rules and paperwork errors that can prevent them from getting their property back.

The consequences can be substantial. Police may seize cash, vehicles, identification documents, electronics and other valuables that people rely on for everyday expenses.

“I felt so weak, so broken, because there was nothing that I could do about it,” Smith-Taylor told Gothamist, describing how she apologized to her children.

According to the department’s annual seized-property report, the NYPD returned approximately 460,000 of more than 630,000 seized items in 2025, or about 70%. The NYPD held more than $5 million in property it said had not been retrieved. The city also generated nearly $1 million by auctioning items through PropertyRoom.com, the report showed.

Must Read

Millions of dollars in property go unclaimed

The lawsuit argues that the system’s complexity places an especially heavy burden on people who have already limited resources or cannot afford legal assistance.

Advertisement

Smith-Taylor’s experience is not the only example cited in the complaint.

Another plaintiff, Nygee Rogers-Green, said police seized his car after an arrest in October 2025. He had been using the vehicle to store items from his late grandmother.

“That was, like, the last piece of something that I had left of her, you know, that I could hold onto,” he told Gothamist.

The lawsuit also describes a shooting victim whose necklace, containing the ashes of his deceased son, was allegedly taken while he was unconscious in an ambulance.

An NYPD spokesperson told Gothamist that the department would review the lawsuit and that the incidents described in the complaint were also under review.

You May Also Like

Share this:
AnnaMarie Houlis Weekend Editor

AnnaMarie Houlis is a journalist and author with more than 15 years of experience, thousands of bylines and four books covering everything from travel, lifestyle and wellness to finance, technology and business.

more from AnnaMarie Houlis

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.