President Donald Trump’s tariffs were intended to revive American manufacturing and reduce the U.S. trade deficit, he said. But those ambitions have come at a cost to American consumers, according to new research from the New York Fed.
In a study published Oct. 6, Fed economists Mary Amiti, Sebastian Heise and David E. Weinstein estimated that the Trump administration’s 2025–2026 tariffs added 2.9 percentage points to consumer goods inflation by February 2026. Without the tariffs, “goods prices would have fallen slightly,” the researchers said.
The economists found that foreign suppliers made few price concessions after the 2025 tariffs took effect. As a result, nearly 90% of the tariff increases translated into higher prices for goods entering the United States. Those costs rose almost immediately, while retail prices took longer to respond, the research notes.
Thanks for subscribing!
The money news that actually matters.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
“Goods price inflation was back near its slightly negative pre-COVID average for most of 2024 and began to edge up late that year, before the new tariffs were introduced,” the economists wrote.
The researchers estimate that roughly a quarter of a tariff increase eventually reaches consumers through higher goods prices. About one-third of that impact comes from American-made products. Ironically, tariffs intended to support U.S. manufacturing can make American-made goods more expensive, particularly when manufacturers rely on imported materials and components.
Trump’s tariff campaign escalated with the “Liberation Day” announcement on April 2, 2025, when he unveiled sweeping import duties targeting dozens of U.S. trading partners. The plan imposed a baseline 10% tariff on most imports, with higher country-specific rates ranging from 11% to 50%, according to The Hill.
Although the Supreme Court has since struck down many of Trump’s tariffs, opening the door to billions of dollars in refunds for importers, their effects on consumer prices have not necessarily disappeared.
What the findings mean for household budgets
A separate study published in September offers a closer look at where consumers felt the pinch the most.
Researchers from Harvard, New York University and Universidad de San Andrés in Argentina tracked prices at five major U.S. retailers and found that imported goods became 4.3% to 6.3% more expensive between March and October 2025, depending on the benchmark used.
Furniture and household equipment were among the hardest-hit categories, reflecting their heavy reliance on Chinese imports. Food and electronics saw smaller overall increases, though coffee was a notable exception.
Even shoppers seeking cheaper alternatives weren’t spared. Within the same product categories, prices for the least expensive imported goods rose about one percentage point more than those for the most expensive options.
These price increases also carry a broader financial cost. The Tax Foundation estimated that tariffs increased household expenses by an average of $1,000 in 2025, with that burden expected to fall to $820 in 2026 following the Supreme Court ruling.
By late 2025, many Americans were blaming tariffs for higher prices. A November 2025 survey by ABC News, The Washington Post and Ipsos found that more than half of respondents believed tariffs were worsening inflation, with households concerned about rising grocery and utility bills.
Those concerns have persisted well into this year. A Sept. 28 Ipsos poll found that 71% of Americans said they had noticed prices rising on products they purchase because of tariffs, up from 43% in February 2025, just before the Liberation Day tariff announcement.
Must Read
- Jeff Bezos backs a platform that lets anyone invest in rental homes for as little as $100 — 6 ways to build wealth like a landlord without actually being one
- The tax breaks in Trump's 'big beautiful bill' expire after 2028. Here are 4 moves to make before the window closes
Are tariffs inflation or a tax?
The debate over tariffs and inflation has intensified this year, as soaring energy prices have added to the cost of living and complicated the Fed’s efforts to contain price growth. Policymakers raised interest rates by a quarter percentage point in September, their first increase since 2023.
At the center of the debate is whether tariffs are fueling lasting inflation or are better understood as a tax on American consumers.
Financial commentator Peter Schiff argues that tariffs act as a hidden tax rather than a source of monetary inflation. He distinguishes between a one-time increase in prices caused by import duties and sustained inflation, which he attributes to government deficits, excessive spending and the expansion of money and credit.
A 2025 Fed study also examined whether tariffs cause lasting inflation. Researchers found that higher tariffs on finished goods generally cause only a one-time price increase, while tariffs on materials used in production contribute to more sustained inflation.
However, unlike Schiff, some economists emphasize the inflationary impact itself. Capital Economics economist Bradley Saunders told CNBC, “Tariffs are simply inflationary, despite what Donald Trump may tell people.”
The distinction may seem technical, but it has important implications for monetary policy. Higher interest rates can help curb sustained inflation, but they may be less useful in blunting a tariff-driven price increase.
Fed Governor Christopher Waller addressed that concern in a July 2025 speech, arguing that “tariff increases are a one-time boost to prices that do not sustainably increase inflation.” He warned that raising interest rates unnecessarily in response to temporary price shocks could damage the broader economy.
You May Also Like
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and 3 simple steps to fix it ASAP
- A single line on your car insurance policy could be inflating your premium by up to 30% — here's what to change
Sam Bourgi is a US based financial markets specialist with over a decade of experience covering investing, economics and digital assets. His work has been cited by Congress, the DOJ, the Bank for International Settlements, Bloomberg, Reuters, CNBC, Fox and Newsweek, as well as academic institutions.
