SPY +0.21%
BND +0.30%
QQQ -1.02%
DIA +1.07%
VNQ +1.94%
GLD +1.67%
BTC -0.22%
AAPL +0.18%
GOOGL +0.15%
NVDA -3.66%
MSFT +1.47%
META +1.22%
AMZN +0.83%
TSLA +1.36%
UBER +3.54%
GS +1.21%
BAC +1.96%
JPM +1.33%
BRK.A +1.89%
COST +0.72%
XOM +3.94%
BABA +2.90%
WMT +3.23%
SPCX -1.98%
DIS +3.42%
F +0.41%
  • Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
Still image from a YouTube video posted by crypto influencer Jack Doherty. Jack Doherty/YouTube

YouTuber says he signed a casino sponsorship without reading the terms — and now he can’t post for 6 months. Its founder calls it ‘money well spent’

A crypto influencer sought sponsorships to make up for his disappointing cryptocurrency performance. But he may have landed himself in an even costlier predicament when he didn’t read the fine print on a contract that could keep him offline for six months.

Jack Doherty, a YouTuber and online personality known for his stunts and livestreams, says he signed an agreement with crypto casino Shuffle.com without fully reading its terms. He now claims the contract prohibits him from posting online, potentially suspending a major source of income.

A search for sponsorships took an unexpected turn

The controversy began after Doherty publicly sought sponsorships to recover his crypto losses.

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

“Unfortunately $JACK isn’t pumping as much as I would’ve liked, so I’m officially taking sponsorships now,” he wrote in an October 7 X post. “Any brands that wanna work with me, please reach out. Need to get my money up somehow.”

On Sept. 27, Shuffle’s official X account responded to a post in which Doherty talked about potentially livestreaming and trading meme coins.

Advertisement

The casino’s response was blunt: “At this point we will pay you to shut the f— up.”

Shuffle then resurfaced the earlier offer, describing it as legitimate — and Doherty accepted the deal without realizing the full implications.

On Oct. 9, Doherty addressed the situation on X, telling followers he had made a grave mistake: “One of the terms is that I’m not allowed to post online anymore, which I thought was a joke but now they’re enforcing it. Working with my lawyer to try and fix this.”

Noah Dummett, cofounder of Shuffle, responded on X that “yes, it’s real” and it was “money well spent to get this mf offline.”

Must Read

The potential financial cost of signing a contract without reading it

The agreement could have significant financial implications for Doherty because his online presence is central to his earning potential.

Influencers can generate revenue through sponsored posts, brand partnerships, advertising and affiliate marketing. In 2025, creators with fewer than 10,000 followers earned around $4,800, while micro influencers averaged about $38,500 and mega influencers earned anywhere from $35,000 to over $1 million for a single post, according to beehiiv, a publishing platform by and for creators.

Advertisement

An extended absence from social media, however, could limit their ability to earn that income, depending on their business models and contractual obligations. And, for a creator already seeking sponsorships to offset a disappointing investment, losing access to the aforementioned opportunities could be particularly consequential.

Neither the complete contract between Shuffle and Doherty nor the amount Shuffle agreed to pay Doherty has been publicly disclosed. But the dispute highlights the importance of understanding an agreement before signing it, particularly when it could restrict someone’s ability to work.

Influencers and content creators may be accustomed to negotiating payments, deliverables and exclusivity provisions with brands. But contracts for any profession can also contain restrictions that affect how someone operates, including non-compete agreements or restrictive covenants.

For now, while Doherty says he is working with legal counsel to resolve the situation, Shuffle maintains that it intends to uphold the deal.

You May Also Like

Share this:
AnnaMarie Houlis Weekend Editor

AnnaMarie Houlis is a journalist and author with more than 15 years of experience, thousands of bylines and four books covering everything from travel, lifestyle and wellness to finance, technology and business.

more from AnnaMarie Houlis

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.