Jun 14, 2026
Imagine Carol, a 67-year-old retired teacher in suburban Ohio. She owns a four-bedroom home outright with no mortgage, but two of those bedrooms have been empty since her kids left a decade ago.
The property taxes keep climbing, the roof needs replacing soon and she recently turned down a trip to see her grandchildren because a plumber’s bill wiped out her travel fund for the month.
Advertisement
She knows it’s time to downsize. What she can’t decide is whether to buy something smaller or, for the first time in 40 years, rent.
It’s a question more older Americans are wrestling with than you might expect.
CNBC notes research from the Joint Center for Housing Studies (JCHS) at Harvard University that says more than seven million adults aged 65 and older — roughly 20% of older households — currently rent rather than own. And Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies confirms the older adult household population has grown 16% since 2019, with older adults now leading 28% of all U.S. households — a share that will keep climbing as boomers age.
The honest case for renting
The appeal to rent starts with math. According to HomeGuide, financial experts recommend saving 1–4% of a home’s value annually for maintenance and repairs — meaning a $400,000 home could cost between $4,000 and $16,000 a year just to maintain, before any major system failures.
Costs for things like roofs, HVAC replacements or plumbing emergencies don’t stop accumulating because you’ve retired.
“Renting often offers more amenities, less maintenance, more accessibility,” Jennifer Molinsky, director of the housing and aging society program at the Joint Center for Housing Studies, told CNBC.
Then there’s the liquidity argument.
Advertisement
A home worth $400,000 is $400,000 that isn’t generating income while you live in it. If Carol sells and invests those proceeds in a diversified portfolio, that capital can start working — potentially producing income, covering rent and still preserving her estate.
For retirees trying to stretch fixed income over an unpredictable lifespan, that flexibility has real value.
Renting also offers something harder to quantify: the ability to move. Whether it’s relocating closer to family, accessing better health care or simply wanting a warmer winter, lease-based living makes transitions far less complicated than selling a property.
Must Read
- You can now build wealth like a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to chase down rent or take 3 A.M tenant calls
- Goldman Sachs used to hoard prime real estate deals for the ultrarich. Two ex-analysts just opened the door for $250
- Robert Kiyosaki begs investors not to miss this ‘explosion’ — says this 1 asset will surge 400% in a year
Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.
The risks renters face
None of this means renting is automatically the right answer, and being clear about the downsides matters. The biggest con is rent increases. Unlike a paid-off mortgage, rent is a variable expense that rises with the market and never goes away.
“As a retired renter, you are faced each month with a housing expense for the rest of your life. It’s an expense that is not fixed, it is variable by market trends,” certified financial planner and CEO and President of The Real Wealth Coterie, Lazetta Rainey Braxton, told CNBC.
That vulnerability is especially sharp on a fixed income.
Advertisement
According to the JCHS, homeowners aged 65 and older accounted for 7.9 million of the nation’s 20 million cost-burdened homeowners in 2023 — and those on fixed incomes face even steeper exposure to rising costs, with the cost-burden rate for older homeowners climbing from 24.2% in 2019 to 27.6% in 2023. Renters in this age group face the same pressures with even less recourse.
There’s also no equity accumulation, no hedge against rising property values in your area and less control over your living space. If your landlord decides to sell, your stability depends on their decisions rather than your own.
What Carol’s decision actually hinges on
The rent-versus-own question in retirement is ultimately less about real estate philosophy and more about cash flow, health trajectory and how much flexibility matters to you going forward.
If Carol’s health is good and her community ties are strong, buying something smaller, like a low-maintenance condo, for instance, keeps her in the ownership market without the upkeep burden of a large house.
If she expects her circumstances to change, or if she wants her equity to work harder, renting gives her options that ownership doesn’t.
Real Estate Witch’s analysis found that 44% of current homeowners believe it’s actually easier to be a renter — a sentiment that likely resonates differently once you’re on a fixed income than it did in earlier years.
Bottom line: There’s no universally correct answer. But for Carol and millions of Americans facing the same crossroads, it’s worth taking the question seriously, rather than defaulting to ownership simply because it’s familiar and comfortable.
You May Also Like
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and the simple steps to fix it ASAP
- Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
- Millionaires under 43 are reshaping investing — just 25% of their portfolios are in stocks. Here’s where their money is going
- Robert Kiyosaki issues grim warning for baby boomers. Many could be ‘wiped out’ and homeless ‘all over’ the country. How to protect yourself now
With a writing and editing career spanning over 15 years, Emma creates and refines content across a broad spectrum of industries, including personal finance, lifestyle, travel, health & wellness, real estate, beauty & fitness and B2B/SaaS/tech.
