SPY +0.16%
BND +0.01%
QQQ -0.81%
DIA +0.58%
VNQ +0.72%
GLD -1.06%
BTC +1.04%
AAPL +2.14%
GOOGL +2.99%
NVDA -2.67%
MSFT +1.30%
META +2.11%
AMZN +0.78%
TSLA -1.24%
UBER -1.05%
GS -0.76%
BAC -0.02%
JPM +0.20%
BRK.A +0.62%
COST +1.00%
XOM +2.28%
BABA -0.68%
WMT +2.42%
SPCX -0.65%
DIS +0.95%
F +0.21%
  • Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Life Insurance
Walt Disney with two children as they look over a ledge during a tour of his Disneyland theme park, which officially opened several months later in March 1955. Lloyd Shearer/Getty Images

Walt Disney borrowed $60,000 against his life insurance to build Disneyland — how policy loans work

Walt Disney had an expensive business idea that his company couldn’t simply write a check for. So, he tapped an unusual mix of corporate investment, outside equity, bank debt and personal assets, including his life insurance policy.

A recent episode of the Acquired podcast chronicled how Disney built what would become the world’s most successful entertainment company and repeatedly took enormous financial risks along the way.

Advertisement

By the early 1950s, Disney wanted to create a physical entertainment destination unlike the amusement parks of the era. What began as a relatively modest park concept eventually grew into plans for a 160-acre Disneyland theme park in Anaheim, California.

The insurance clarity you've been missing.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

The biggest problem, however, was the price tag. The park was initially expected to cost $5 million, roughly 10 times the less than $500,000 Walt Disney Productions earned in net income in 1952.

Disney personally committed roughly $250,000 to the project, according to Acquired. To raise his share, Disney sold his Palm Springs vacation home, took out a personal loan and borrowed $60,000 against his life insurance policy with Commerce Trust, now Commerce Bank. The loan is documented in a 1954 agreement that resurfaced decades later after its owner, a Disney memorabilia collector, contacted Commerce about it.

It’s a striking example of just how much Walt was willing to put behind Disneyland. He wasn’t only staking his professional reputation on the project, he was putting his personal finances on the line, too.

How borrowing against life insurance works

Disney didn’t have to cash out or cancel his life insurance policy to get the $60,000. Instead, Commerce Trust lent him the money using his life insurance policy as security.

According to former Commerce executive Jim Linn, loans backed by life insurance were a significant part of the bank’s business in the early 1950s. Commerce offered them at 2% interest, compared with roughly 6% charged by life insurers themselves.

“Our rate was so good that people from around the country came to us for those loans,” Linn said in an article on Commerce Bank’s website.

Borrowing against life insurance is still possible today, although the mechanics can be different from Disney’s arrangement. The option is generally available with permanent life insurance policies that build cash value, including whole life and certain universal life policies, according to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC).

Cash value is essentially the portion of a permanent life insurance policy that builds value while the policyholder is alive. With whole life insurance, the NAIC says cash value comes from premiums paid into the policy, minus fees and the cost of providing the insurance.

Advertisement

The insurer doesn’t put part of each premium into a savings account. Instead, cash value grows according to the terms of the policy and can eventually become an asset the policyholder can access. With whole life insurance, for example, it typically grows according to a schedule established by the policy.

Once enough has accumulated, the policyholder may be able to borrow against it. With a typical policy loan today, the insurer lends the money using the policy’s cash value as security.

For example, suppose a policyholder has a permanent life insurance policy with a $500,000 death benefit and $100,000 in cash value. Depending on the terms of the policy, the policyholder may be able to borrow a portion of that $100,000 without canceling the policy or giving up their insurance coverage.

This flexibility can make a policy loan an appealing source of cash. But borrowing against life insurance isn’t free, and letting a loan linger can eat into the benefits that made the policy valuable in the first place.

Advertisement

Must Read

The risks of borrowing against life insurance

Policy loans come with interest and unpaid debt can reduce what beneficiaries eventually receive. According to the NAIC, borrowing against a whole life policy can reduce the amount beneficiaries will receive if the policyholder dies. The regulator also warns that unpaid policy loans, plus interest, are subtracted from the death benefit when the policyholder dies.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority raises another concern. While it similarly warns that borrowing from an existing policy “will almost certainly reduce the death benefit,” loans and withdrawals can also make it harder to keep a policy active without additional out-of-pocket premiums.

Problems can compound if the loan balance grows large enough to jeopardize the policy itself. Losing coverage is one risk, but a tax bill can be another.

The IRS says that when a life insurance policy is surrendered for cash, proceeds above the policyholder’s investment in the contract are generally taxable. Unpaid loans can factor into that calculation, meaning someone who has borrowed heavily against a policy could face a tax bill if they later surrender it.

Disney’s experience shows the appeal of tapping a life insurance policy for cash, but the stakes can look very different for an ordinary policyholder. Borrowing can ultimately mean less protection for beneficiaries or, if the debt becomes unmanageable, losing the coverage altogether.

You May Also Like

Share this:
Sam Bourgi Contributing writer

Sam Bourgi is a financial markets specialist with over a decade of experience covering investing, economics and digital assets. His work has been cited by U.S. Congress, the DOJ, the Bank for International Settlements, Bloomberg, Reuters, CNBC, Fox and Newsweek, as well as academic institutions.

more from Sam Bourgi

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.