SPY -0.22%
BND -1.02%
QQQ -0.48%
DIA -0.42%
VNQ -1.18%
GLD -0.24%
BTC -1.53%
AAPL +5.16%
GOOGL +0.01%
NVDA -3.31%
MSFT +0.18%
META +5.55%
AMZN -0.11%
TSLA -0.79%
UBER -1.98%
GS -0.82%
BAC +0.48%
JPM +0.93%
BRK.A +1.08%
COST -0.57%
XOM +3.44%
BABA -3.20%
WMT +0.97%
SPCX -2.08%
DIS +1.37%
F -0.29%
  • Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Stocks
burry and lululemon Andrew Toth/Cheng Xin/Getty Images

Michael Burry calls Lululemon ‘the trickster’ in his portfolio — why it’s now his biggest position

Contrarian investor Michael Burry of “The Big Short” fame has watched his Lululemon Athletica (NASDAQ: LULU) bet go from bad to worse, yet the battered apparel retailer remains his largest holding as its shares trade at their lowest level in eight years.

Burry called Lululemon the “trickster” in his portfolio in a Sept. 3 Substack post, a fitting description for a stock that has repeatedly tested his conviction. Lululemon now accounts for roughly 17% of his portfolio, according to Finbold.

Advertisement

The post came a day after Lululemon reported disappointing second-quarter results, with revenue and gross profit declining. Shares plunged in after-hours trading and continued falling the following day, closing down more than 17%. The stock has since fallen below $100.

Invest smarter with our free newsletter.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Burry’s bet dates back to 2025, when he began building a position through his now-shuttered Scion Asset Management. According to filings available on Dataroma, Scion held 50,000 shares in the second quarter, valued at $11.9 million at the end of June 2025, before doubling its position to 100,000 shares the following quarter. The stake was worth roughly $17.8 million at the end of September.

But the latest results have forced Burry to rethink Lululemon’s value. After reviewing the company’s earnings, he said his “IV15” estimate had fallen “rather dramatically.” Burry’s IV15 metric is the price at which he believes the stock could deliver a 15% annualized return over 15 years, based on his expectations for the company’s future cash flows.

The quarter offered plenty to challenge those expectations. Lululemon’s comparable sales, a closely watched measure that strips out much of the growth from opening new stores, fell 9% globally. Revenue fell 8% in the Americas, while mainland China revenue rose 4% as reported but declined 2% after excluding currency movements.

One of the more troubling declines came from a product at the heart of Lululemon’s business: women’s leggings. Sales in the category fell roughly 20% during the quarter, Reuters reported.

Lululemon is well below Burry’s ‘load up’ price

Back in February, Lululemon looked cheap enough for Burry to buy more. In a Feb. 2 Substack post, he said he was “adding to [his] position a bit” and called the $150 range his “load up the truck price.”

As of Friday, LULU traded about 35% below that level.

Wall Street sees more pain ahead. Morgan Stanley recently cut its LULU price target to $83 from $93 and maintained an “underweight” rating. As Investing.com reported, the bank expects Lululemon to pursue a “shrink to grow” strategy as it tries to revive the business, with further cuts to earnings estimates likely along the way.

Burry has identified another possible path to upside. In the same February post, he said Lululemon remained an attractive candidate for a founder-led or private-equity buyout. An acquirer would typically need to pay a premium to win over shareholders, potentially giving early investors a gain even if the underlying business takes longer to recover.

Advertisement

A takeover, however, is far from guaranteed. Burry presented it as one potential outcome for Lululemon, not the basis of his investment thesis.

Must Read

The perils of contrarianism

Burry’s underwater position highlights one of the risks of contrarian investing: Lululemon was already flashing warning signs before he bought in.

By 2024, growth in its core North American market was slowing, the company had cut its sales and profit forecasts and a botched launch forced it to pull its $98 Breezethrough leggings from shelves. Reuters also reported that Alo Yoga and Vuori were gaining ground on Lululemon, with the newer brands refreshing styles more frequently and attracting younger shoppers.

The problems followed Burry into 2025. In the quarter before Scion disclosed its position, Lululemon’s comparable sales in the Americas fell 2%, while inventories jumped 23%.

Burry knew he was buying into a struggling company. The question now is whether Lululemon has fallen faster than its problems justify, or whether those problems have become bigger than the bargain he originally saw.

You May Also Like

Share this:
Sam Bourgi Contributing writer

Sam Bourgi is a financial markets specialist with over a decade of experience covering investing, economics and digital assets. His work has been cited by U.S. Congress, the DOJ, the Bank for International Settlements, Bloomberg, Reuters, CNBC, Fox and Newsweek, as well as academic institutions.

more from Sam Bourgi

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.