SPY -1.19%
BND +0.09%
QQQ -0.32%
DIA -2.04%
VNQ -0.68%
GLD -1.88%
BTC -3.40%
AAPL -3.84%
GOOGL -1.45%
NVDA -1.68%
MSFT -3.07%
META +2.13%
AMZN -1.24%
TSLA -3.10%
UBER -2.73%
GS -0.76%
BAC -0.86%
JPM -2.75%
BRK.A -0.69%
COST -1.67%
XOM -0.15%
BABA +0.13%
WMT -2.47%
SPCX +2.08%
DIS -2.01%
F -2.91%
  • Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
President Trump meets with several doctors inside the Oval Office. Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images

Hospitals say Trump administration's upcoming rules are worse than Medicaid cuts and will force layoffs: 'There's no need to cut any more'

Craig Thompson used to fly to Washington about once a year — before inflation and shrinking Medicaid payments closed half of the maternity beds at his rural Missouri hospital system, and before Congress passed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

Now, the Golden Valley Memorial Healthcare CEO, whose 50-bed hospital runs the only maternity ward in about an hour’s drive in any direction, makes the trip every other month as he tries to get the bill’s Medicaid cuts reversed.

Advertisement

The law that he’s fighting is on track to pull $911 billion in federal funding for Medicaid over a decade, and hospitals likely figured that was the worst of it. But the two rule changes the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has since proposed would go hundreds of billions deeper, executives told Politico — deep enough to potentially force hospitals to cut staff, close service lines, merge with bigger systems or shut down for good.

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

“Our core message to CMS is to stick to the statute. Congress cut enough,” said Robert Nelb, director of policy at America’s Essential Hospitals, a Washington-based association of hospitals that treat large numbers of low-income patients. “There’s no need to cut any more out of the Medicaid system at a time when the safety net is really struggling.”

What the new rules could do

Medicaid runs on a split bill: the states put up part of the cost while Washington matches it. For decades, many states have taxed their own hospitals, which enlarges the state’s share on paper and pulls down a bigger federal match. The extra money then returns to those same hospitals as larger reimbursements.

Congress, however, narrowed that practice last year, along with state-directed payments — a separate tool states use to lift reimbursement rates for chosen providers, rural hospitals among them. But the CMS’s two proposed rules would squeeze both even harder.

How much harder? The CMS’ own actuaries put the provider tax rule at $246 billion in reduced federal Medicaid spending from fiscal 2026 through 2035, against the roughly $332 billion the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) scored for the provider tax and state-directed payment provisions Congress passed, according to an analysis by federal health officials.

The hit to hospitals, however, runs larger than either number because federal savings and provider revenue aren’t the same measure. Georgetown University’s Center for Children and Families read the CBO’s impact analysis to mean the two rules together would cut payments to providers by about $750 billion once state dollars are counted alongside federal dollars.

For its part, the CMS frames both rules as efforts to protect Medicaid’s financial integrity. By its count, state-directed payments went from two states in 2016 to 41 today, accounting for over a quarter of all Medicaid managed care spending in fiscal 2025 and would grow from $107 billion in fiscal 2024 to $296 billion by fiscal 2034 if nothing changes. Federal prosecutors have kept up a steady run of Medicaid cases too, among them a $12.7 million kickback scheme in North Carolina.

And conservative groups, including the think tank Paragon Health Institute, have likened the hospital taxes to “money laundering,” arguing they let states hand federal taxpayers the bill for spending that the states signed up for themselves.

Hospitals don’t argue the system is perfect. “Everyone agrees Medicaid financing should be accountable,” Charlene MacDonald, president and CEO of the Federation of American Hospitals, told Politico. “The real question is: Do states have the resources they need to address chronic underpayment in communities?”

Advertisement

Moneywise asked CMS whether the proposed rules reach past what Congress wrote and asked Paragon to respond to the hospitals’ pushback. Neither had responded in time for publication.

Must Read

Hospitals are already cutting staff and hiring lobbyists

Providence, a nonprofit with more than 50 hospitals across the west, has already trimmed staff and pulled back on supply contracts. Its projected loss from the way CMS applies the Medicaid cuts has climbed from $900 million to $1.3 billion.

Hospitals, meanwhile, are hiring lobbyists to assist in their efforts. Missouri’s hospital association reportedly put $120,000 into lobbying in the second quarter 0f 2026, more than any quarter since 2011, and Baron Public Affairs, a government affairs consultancy, counted four new hospital lobbying registrations in May, five in June and 13 in July.

When the state-directed payment rule came out in May, America’s Essential Hospitals CEO Jennifer DeCubellis said the caps “go far beyond what Congress intended.” The CMS had already finalized an earlier provider tax rule despite similar objections.

What happens before Sept. 21

Comments on the provider tax rule close September 21, and a third Medicaid rule on program integrity is still under review at the Office of Management and Budget.

For anyone on Medicaid, or anyone whose nearest hospital depends on it, the next few weeks will help decide how deep the cuts run. Alameda Health System, a public safety-net system in Oakland, California that draws about 60% of its revenue from Medi-Cal, announced 247 layoffs in December and mailed the notices in January, though the count shifted over the following months — 92 positions were restored in July after Alameda County came up with $19.3 million. The system still expects annual losses above $100 million by 2030.

“This is the most challenging economic time I’ve ever seen,” Thompson told Politico.

You May Also Like

Share this:

Godwin Oluponmile is a content specialist, SEO strategist and copywriter with seven years of expertise in finance, Web 3.0, B2B SaaS and technology. His work has been featured in publications such as Entrepreneur, HackerNoon, Blocktelegraph and Benzinga.

more from Godwin Oluponmile

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.