Craig Thompson used to fly to Washington about once a year — before inflation and shrinking Medicaid payments closed half of the maternity beds at his rural Missouri hospital system, and before Congress passed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
Now, the Golden Valley Memorial Healthcare CEO, whose 50-bed hospital runs the only maternity ward in about an hour’s drive in any direction, makes the trip every other month as he tries to get the bill’s Medicaid cuts reversed.
The law that he’s fighting is on track to pull $911 billion in federal funding for Medicaid over a decade, and hospitals likely figured that was the worst of it. But the two rule changes the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has since proposed would go hundreds of billions deeper, executives told Politico — deep enough to potentially force hospitals to cut staff, close service lines, merge with bigger systems or shut down for good.
Thanks for subscribing!
The money news that actually matters.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
“Our core message to CMS is to stick to the statute. Congress cut enough,” said Robert Nelb, director of policy at America’s Essential Hospitals, a Washington-based association of hospitals that treat large numbers of low-income patients. “There’s no need to cut any more out of the Medicaid system at a time when the safety net is really struggling.”
What the new rules could do
Medicaid runs on a split bill: the states put up part of the cost while Washington matches it. For decades, many states have taxed their own hospitals, which enlarges the state’s share on paper and pulls down a bigger federal match. The extra money then returns to those same hospitals as larger reimbursements.
Congress, however, narrowed that practice last year, along with state-directed payments — a separate tool states use to lift reimbursement rates for chosen providers, rural hospitals among them. But the CMS’s two proposed rules would squeeze both even harder.
How much harder? The CMS’ own actuaries put the provider tax rule at $246 billion in reduced federal Medicaid spending from fiscal 2026 through 2035, against the roughly $332 billion the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) scored for the provider tax and state-directed payment provisions Congress passed, according to an analysis by federal health officials.
The hit to hospitals, however, runs larger than either number because federal savings and provider revenue aren’t the same measure. Georgetown University’s Center for Children and Families read the CBO’s impact analysis to mean the two rules together would cut payments to providers by about $750 billion once state dollars are counted alongside federal dollars.
For its part, the CMS frames both rules as efforts to protect Medicaid’s financial integrity. By its count, state-directed payments went from two states in 2016 to 41 today, accounting for over a quarter of all Medicaid managed care spending in fiscal 2025 and would grow from $107 billion in fiscal 2024 to $296 billion by fiscal 2034 if nothing changes. Federal prosecutors have kept up a steady run of Medicaid cases too, among them a $12.7 million kickback scheme in North Carolina.
And conservative groups, including the think tank Paragon Health Institute, have likened the hospital taxes to “money laundering,” arguing they let states hand federal taxpayers the bill for spending that the states signed up for themselves.
Hospitals don’t argue the system is perfect. “Everyone agrees Medicaid financing should be accountable,” Charlene MacDonald, president and CEO of the Federation of American Hospitals, told Politico. “The real question is: Do states have the resources they need to address chronic underpayment in communities?”
Moneywise asked CMS whether the proposed rules reach past what Congress wrote and asked Paragon to respond to the hospitals’ pushback. Neither had responded in time for publication.
Must Read
- Jeff Bezos backs a platform that lets anyone invest in rental homes for as little as $100 — 6 ways to build wealth like a landlord without actually being one
- The tax breaks in Trump's 'big beautiful bill' expire after 2028. Here are 4 moves to make before the window closes
Hospitals are already cutting staff and hiring lobbyists
Providence, a nonprofit with more than 50 hospitals across the west, has already trimmed staff and pulled back on supply contracts. Its projected loss from the way CMS applies the Medicaid cuts has climbed from $900 million to $1.3 billion.
Hospitals, meanwhile, are hiring lobbyists to assist in their efforts. Missouri’s hospital association reportedly put $120,000 into lobbying in the second quarter 0f 2026, more than any quarter since 2011, and Baron Public Affairs, a government affairs consultancy, counted four new hospital lobbying registrations in May, five in June and 13 in July.
When the state-directed payment rule came out in May, America’s Essential Hospitals CEO Jennifer DeCubellis said the caps “go far beyond what Congress intended.” The CMS had already finalized an earlier provider tax rule despite similar objections.
What happens before Sept. 21
Comments on the provider tax rule close September 21, and a third Medicaid rule on program integrity is still under review at the Office of Management and Budget.
For anyone on Medicaid, or anyone whose nearest hospital depends on it, the next few weeks will help decide how deep the cuts run. Alameda Health System, a public safety-net system in Oakland, California that draws about 60% of its revenue from Medi-Cal, announced 247 layoffs in December and mailed the notices in January, though the count shifted over the following months — 92 positions were restored in July after Alameda County came up with $19.3 million. The system still expects annual losses above $100 million by 2030.
“This is the most challenging economic time I’ve ever seen,” Thompson told Politico.
You May Also Like
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and 3 simple steps to fix it ASAP
- A single line on your car insurance policy could be inflating your premium by up to 30% — here's what to change
Godwin Oluponmile is a content specialist, SEO strategist and copywriter with seven years of expertise in finance, Web 3.0, B2B SaaS and technology. His work has been featured in publications such as Entrepreneur, HackerNoon, Blocktelegraph and Benzinga.
