Apr 3, 2025
Hoarding possessions is considered to be a mental-health disorder, but is hoarding wealth considered to be a similar psychological issue?
Scott Galloway, professor of marketing at New York University, certainly thinks so.
Advertisement
“A virus that infects America is that people hoard [money],” says the 60-year-old on an episode of The Prof G podcast. “There is no reason to be a billionaire.”
While some might agree with Galloway’s proclamation, roughly 800 Americans have found a reason to accumulate over $1 billion, according to the Institute for Policy Studies. Among this cohort are 12 American billionaires who have earned more than $100 billion and are still actively working to accumulate more, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.
Meanwhile, the median net worth of American households is roughly $192,900, according to the most recent data published by the Federal Reserve.
Galloway isn’t the first to highlight this wealth disparity and the apparent hoarding of assets by those who already have enough money to last for generations. However, Galloway does offer a unique perspective and a potential solution to the problem.
The link between happiness and income
Galloway argues that a person can experience significant happiness when their income jumps from $30,000 a year to $50,000, but beyond a certain threshold, additional income offers diminishing returns on happiness.
“The difference between anything above $10 million a year is nominal if non-existent,” he claims.
This echoes the findings of a 2010 study published by Nobel Prize laureates Daniel Kahneman and Angus Deaton which revealed that a rise in income can improve someone’s well-being, but only up to a ceiling of $75,000 a year.
Similarly, a study by Wharton University’s Matthew Killingsworth found that “policies aimed at raising the incomes of lower earners could do far more to improve overall happiness than simply giving bonuses to the wealthy or cutting taxes for the highest earners.”
Advertisement
With this in mind, Galloway suggests a more progressive tax structure could help resolve America’s wealth gap and economic dissatisfaction.
Must Read
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — are you doing the same?
- Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
- Robert Kiyosaki says this 1 asset will surge 400% in a year and begs investors not to miss this ‘explosion’
Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.
Progressive tax policy
According to the Tax Foundation, a “progressive” tax system is one where high-income individuals or households pay more in taxes than low-income earners. Given that there are seven tax brackets, ranging from 10% to 37% for the 2024 tax year, America’s tax policy can be considered progressive.
However, Galloway calls for higher tax rates at higher income thresholds.
“Why wouldn’t we have, or restore, a much more progressive tax structure above $10 million a year?” he asks, explaining that such taxes would have minimal impacts on the well-being of ultra-wealthy individuals. “These people aren’t going to lose anything. They’re not going to be any less happier.”
The revenue generated from a more progressive tax policy could then be used for vocational training programs, or a child tax credit to enhance the well-being of lower- to middle-income Americans. “That will create a ton of happiness across our nation,” says Galloway.
From 1944 to 1963, America's tax system was far more progressive, with the top income tax rate exceeding 90% — peaking at 94% in 1944 for the highest earners, according to accounting firm Wolters Kluwer.
Polling data from this period suggests consumers were relatively satisfied with their lives. In March, 1957, 96% of U.S. adults said they were either “very happy” or “fairly happy” while only 3% said they were unhappy, according to Gallup.
You May Also Like
- Turning 50 with $0 saved for retirement? Most people don’t realize they’re actually just entering their prime earning decade. Here are 6 ways to catch up fast
- Inside a $1B real estate fund offering access to thousands of income-producing rental properties — with flexible minimums starting at $10
- Vanguard’s outlook on U.S. stocks is raising alarm bells for retirees. Here’s why and how to protect yourself
- Here are 5 easy ways to own multiple properties like Bezos and Beyoncé. You can start with $10 (and no, you don’t have to manage a single thing)
Vishesh Raisinghani is a financial journalist covering personal finance, investing and the global economy. He's also the founder of Sharpe Ascension Inc., a content marketing agency focused on investment firms. His work has appeared in Moneywise, Yahoo Finance!, Motley Fool, Seeking Alpha, Mergers & Acquisitions Magazine and Piggybank.
