America’s federal tax code spans more than 6,000 pages, with roughly 15,000 more devoted to interpreting the rules. Wrestling with all that complexity is an annual headache for many taxpayers, but the cost goes well beyond tax software and accounting fees.
In an analysis published Sept. 25, the Tax Foundation, a nonpartisan nonprofit organization, estimated that complying with the federal tax code will cost Americans $544.6 billion this year, equivalent to more than 1.7% of U.S. GDP.
The bill includes $387.5 billion in lost productivity from time spent dealing with taxes and another $157.1 billion in out-of-pocket expenses, including tax software and professional preparation.
Thanks for subscribing!
Keep more of your money — subscribe free.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
For individual taxpayers, much of the cost comes down to time. According to the Tax Foundation, the IRS estimates that completing Form 1040, the standard federal individual income tax return, takes an average of 12 hours to complete — though Austin & Larson Tax Resolution says the average time to complete the form is 13 hours.
The Tax Foundation values an individual’s time at $47.55 an hour, based on average wages and benefits. Using the figures above, the average return eats up roughly $570 to $618 worth of a taxpayer’s time. This is the estimated value of the hours spent dealing with taxes instead of doing something else.
The burden can be considerably higher for taxpayers with more complicated returns. The IRS puts the average at eight hours for people without business income, compared with 24 hours for those with it.
Crypto adds to the reporting burden
For investors, trading cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ether can make tax reporting even more complicated.
Form 1099-B now accounts for the largest share of the compliance burden calculated by the Tax Foundation. The form, traditionally used by brokers to report securities and other transactions, carried an estimated burden of nearly 2.2 billion hours, up from 674 million in 2022. The associated cost has climbed to more than $130 billion.
The surge coincided with new reporting requirements for digital assets. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021 expanded the information crypto brokers must report to the IRS and broadened the definition of a broker to capture more cryptocurrency intermediaries.
The requirements were intended to improve tax compliance and increase revenue. The Joint Committee on Taxation originally estimated the digital-asset provisions would raise roughly $28 billion over 10 years, a fraction of the annual compliance burden now associated with Form 1099-B.
Crypto ownership has also become widespread enough that the rules can affect a sizable share of taxpayers. Surveys from Gallup and Pew Research Center estimate that between 14% and 19% of U.S. adults have invested in or used cryptocurrency. Pew found the share rises to 28% among adults between 30 and 49 years of age.
Regulatory uncertainty remains one reason that some Americans have refrained from investing. Charles Schwab’s 2025 Modern Wealth Survey found that 30% of non-crypto investors cited insufficient regulation as a reason for not owning it.
Ironically, Washington has made significant progress on the regulatory front. Congress established a federal framework for payment stablecoins through the GENIUS Act, while the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, have moved ahead with rulemaking under existing laws.
The broader CLARITY Act, which would establish a market structure framework for digital assets, has yet to clear Congress. For investors, however, clearer crypto rules don’t necessarily translate into a simpler tax return.
Must Read
- Jeff Bezos backs a platform that lets anyone invest in rental homes for as little as $100 — 6 ways to build wealth like a landlord without actually being one
- The tax breaks in Trump's 'big beautiful bill' expire after 2028. Here are 4 moves to make before the window closes
Why the tax code keeps getting more complicated
The complexity of the U.S. tax code is nothing new, but decades of revisions have kept adding to it. The National Taxpayers Union Foundation estimates that Congress has made 9,630 changes to the tax code since 2000.
Part of the problem is that the tax system is expected to do much more than simply collect revenue. The Tax Policy Center points to competing goals around fairness, economic growth and enforcement, along with tax breaks designed to benefit particular groups and industries.
Politics adds another layer. New tax breaks often come with income limits, eligibility requirements and other restrictions that narrow who qualifies. Congress also tends to modify existing rules rather than replace them, adding new provisions to a tax code already full of exceptions and carve-outs.
“Often Congress designs legislation under self-imposed constraints, such as short-term revenue goals or effects on the distribution of tax burdens among income groups,” the Tax Policy Center said. In other words, some of the complexity comes from lawmakers trying to limit the cost of tax breaks or determine who benefits from them.
The federal government collected $5.24 trillion in fiscal 2025, according to the U.S. Treasury, but spent $7.01 trillion, leaving a $1.78 trillion deficit. The gap has widened again in fiscal 2026, with the Congressional Budget Office estimating a $2 trillion deficit through August.
Taxpayers therefore bear the cost of government in more ways than one. Beyond the taxes themselves, Americans spend hundreds of billions of dollars worth of time and money simply complying with the system that collects them.
You May Also Like
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and 3 simple steps to fix it ASAP
- A single line on your car insurance policy could be inflating your premium by up to 30% — here's what to change
Sam Bourgi is a US based financial markets specialist with over a decade of experience covering investing, economics and digital assets. His work has been cited by Congress, the DOJ, the Bank for International Settlements, Bloomberg, Reuters, CNBC, Fox and Newsweek, as well as academic institutions.
