Worried your Social Security retirement benefits are at risk?
While cuts to the program won’t eliminate your check, they could substantially reduce it. Social Security’s retirement trust fund is projected to run out by 2032, according to the Social Security Administration’s latest Trustees Report. At that point, the program will depend entirely on incoming payroll taxes, which will only cover about 78% of benefits.
That means future retirees could see a 22% cut in their benefits unless Congress intervenes with a solution — and the clock is ticking.
Thanks for subscribing!
Retire on your terms — we'll show you how.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
Why is the trust fund running out of money?
A big part of the issue is the way Social Security is set up. As a worker, you pay a 6.2% payroll tax on your earnings (up to $184,500 in 2026) to fund Social Security. Employers can match this up to 6.2%. But this isn’t a retirement savings program, nor is it a type of pension.
“Nor are benefits based on or calculated to match a worker’s payroll tax contributions,” according to an analysis from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CFRB). “Rather, Social Security is a pay-as-you-go social insurance program where current workers’ payroll taxes finance the benefits of current retirees.”
In its analysis, the nonpartisan budget watchdog found that “Scheduled benefits are projected to be about 133% of taxes for beneficiaries retiring this decade, on a present value basis. Benefits will be about 265% as large as just the worker share of payroll taxes on a present value basis.”
However, that’s the average return — it varies widely, since benefits are based on one’s lifetime earnings history and a progressive wage-indexing formula. But, to put it in perspective, the CFRB’s calculations show that in 2027, a median-wage retiree can expect about $730,000 in benefits, “compared to less than $200,000 paid in taxes by them and their employer.”
“In other words, a typical retiree’s scheduled benefits will total 3.7 times taxes paid in, with benefits exceeding taxes after just six years of benefits,” according to the CFRB. And those benefits exceed the worker’s own contributions (when employer matches aren’t accounted for) after just three years.
Must Read
- Jeff Bezos backs a platform that lets anyone invest in rental homes for as little as $100 — 6 ways to build wealth like a landlord without actually being one
- Here’s the average income of Americans by age in 2026. Are you keeping up or falling behind?
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and 3 simple steps to fix it ASAP
Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.
Why younger generations could pay the price
While the math seems to be a little wonky, it’s worked out because Gen X, millennials and Gen Z are contributing to the program through their payroll taxes while expecting that they’ll receive the same benefits. But when it comes time for them to retire, that math likely won’t be to their benefit.
While the program is paying out 33% more in benefits than it collects in taxes, it’s also going to cost 35% more to run the program over the next 75 years, according to the CFRB.
Nowadays, there are fewer workers supporting a larger population of retirees — and those retirees are also living longer. Back in the early 1950s, there were about 16 workers for every retiree receiving benefits. As of 2022, there were about 2.8 workers for every retiree — and that number is projected to keep falling.
Furthermore, the average life expectancy in 1950 was around 68 (so, if you retired at 65, you might only have a few years to collect your retirement benefit). But these days, the average life expectancy of an American sits around 79.
But many Americans expect to live much longer, which means some could enjoy a retirement that lasts three decades or more. One survey by Western & Southern Financial Group found that, in general, Americans expect to live until 85, while 35% of respondents expect to live to 90 or beyond.
Yet, the same survey finds that their savings are projected to run out by age 79, and 82% of respondents haven’t factored inflation or rising healthcare costs into their retirement plans.
How you can protect your retirement income
With this in mind, many retirees will be increasingly reliant on Social Security — a program that’s in dire need of an overhaul. If nothing changes, more than 60 million retirees could see their monthly check slashed by an average of $500 starting in 2032.
This would differ by state, with cuts ranging from $459 to $556. Retirees in Connecticut, New Jersey and New Hampshire would see the largest cuts.
And while you might be hoping that Congress comes up with a solution before 2032, hope is not a strategy. One strategy that could help is to wait longer to claim your Social Security retirement benefit. If you claim at age 62 — the earliest you can start collecting your benefits — then you’re locking in a permanent 30% reduction.
If you wait until your full retirement age (FRA) — between ages 66 and 67, depending on your year of birth — you’ll receive your full benefit. And if you wait past your FRA, you’ll earn delayed retirement credits of 8% per year up until age 70.
So, if you were planning to claim your benefit early, waiting until your FRA or beyond could make up for any cuts to the program. That, of course, assumes you have enough money to cover your expenses in the meantime, whether you’re still working or have other sources of retirement income.
You can work with a financial planner or use the SSA’s online tools to model your projected benefit if you claim at 62, FRA and 70 — taking both the current program and a potential 22% overall reduction into consideration.
If you find you’re too dependent on Social Security — say, it makes up more than half of your expected retirement income — then it’s time to consider other options, such as delaying retirement, accelerating your retirement savings or even looking to downsize in retirement to cut costs.
It may mean working part-time during your golden years (if you’re still in good health), but ideally you’d want this to be a choice — not something you’re doing to survive.
While there’s still hope that Congress will find a solution — such as raising the payroll tax cap or increasing the retirement age — it could still end up reducing benefits or raising taxes for younger generations.
Preparing now can help to protect your retirement income, rather than relying on Congress to find a last-minute solution.
You May Also Like
- The tax breaks in Trump's 'big beautiful bill' expire after 2028. Here are 4 moves to make before the window closes
- A single line on your car insurance policy could be inflating your premium by up to 30% — here's what to change
- This fund has historically paid 8% or higher for 25 months, with just a $100 minimum to start — 4 ways to grow your cash without the stock market
- Millionaires under 43 are reshaping investing — just 32% of their portfolios are in stocks. Here’s where their money is going
Vawn Himmelsbach is a veteran journalist who covers tech, business, finance and travel. Her work has been featured in publications such as The Globe and Mail, Toronto Star, National Post, CBC News, Yahoo Finance, MSN, CAA Magazine, Travelweek, Explore Magazine and Consumer Reports.
