• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Retirement
Kevin O'Leary during a visit to "Outnumbered" at Fox News Channel Studio Roy Rochlin/Getty Images

Kevin O'Leary says you should have $100,000 saved by age 33 — here's why that figure matters for your future

Kevin O’Leary has a dollar figure for you, and it comes with a deadline.

“By the time you hit 33 years old, you should have $100,000 saved somewhere,” the Shark Tank investor and personal finance commentator said in a recent video shared on X. “Make that your goal.”

Advertisement

He even built in some wiggle room, noting 35-years-old is okay too.

Retire on your terms — we'll show you how.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Hitting that mark sets up up for $500,000 before retirement

O’Leary frames this age as a financial inflection point — the moment when time and compounding interest either start working for you or begin to slip away. His logic extends to a larger goal: accumulating $500,000 before retirement.

“Your goal should be to try and amass at least $500,000,” he said. “So you start to chop up the decades you’re gonna work. By 33, you better have 100K if you’re gonna get the other 400K by the time you’re 60.”

His prescription for getting there is to save 20% of your paycheck and then let market growth do the work.

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

How most Americans are actually doing

Most people are nowhere near O’Leary’s target. According to Vanguard’s How America Saves 2026 report, the median 401(k) balance across all savers at year-end 2025 was $44,115.

That figure skews upward because it includes older, higher-balance savers. For workers in their late 20s and early 30s specifically, balances are considerably lower: the Vanguard data confirms the median for workers under 25 is just $2,234, and $18,732 for those aged 25–34, making O’Leary’s $100,000 target all but insurmountable.

Advertisement

That gap is partly structural. SmartAsset notes median earnings for Americans aged 20–24 are just $41,392 annually, before rising to $59,800 for those aged 25–34 — meaning early-career workers are simultaneously building income while managing competing financial pressures.

And CNBC’s analysis of Federal Student Aid data shows almost 43 million Americans have about $1.83 trillion in student loans — a burden that weighs heaviest in the early career years when O’Leary’s 20% savings rate would be hardest to achieve.

Still, it’s worth noting that the most significant jumps in retirement savings occur between your 40s and 50s — when incomes are higher, debt loads have often eased and compounding has had more time to work, according to Empower’s data. That makes the early accumulation O’Leary prescribes by 33 all the more critical as the foundation for what comes later.

The math behind the 20% rule

O’Leary’s method is achievable but demanding. It assumes consistent contributions and long enough time in the market to let compound interest work its magic. A Kiplinger savings analysis illustrates the underlying principle directly: $10,000 invested at age 30 at 7% annual returns grows to roughly $106,000 by age 65. Wait until 45, and the same investment yields only about $38,000.

For someone earning near the U.S. median — which the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports for full-time workers as $1,233 per week, or roughly $64,000 annually — saving 20% means setting aside approximately $12,800 annually, or about $1,070 per month.

Accounting for employer 401(k) matching, which Vanguard found averages 4.7% of salary, reduces the required personal contribution, but the target still demands consistent prioritization over discretionary spending.

Advertisement

Make saving a habit

O’Leary’s specific figure is less important than the habit it represents. As the SEC notes, “The earlier you start investing, the more powerful the impact of compounding becomes” — meaning consistent early contributions, even smaller ones, can outperform larger amounts invested later.

To help with that, the IRS contribution limits allow workers under 50 to contribute up to $24,500 to a 401(k) annually, and those 50 and older can contribute an additional $8,000 in catch-up contributions.

“If you haven’t saved anything by the time you’re 33, you’re way behind the 8-ball,” O’Leary said.

Regardless of your exact age, the underlying point is the same: the longer you delay, the harder every subsequent decade becomes.

You May Also Like

Share this:

With a writing and editing career spanning over 15 years, Emma creates and refines content across a broad spectrum of industries, including personal finance, lifestyle, travel, health & wellness, real estate, beauty & fitness and B2B/SaaS/tech.

more from Emma Caplan-Fisher

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.