• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon speaks during a press conference. DT phots1/Shutterstock

The Trump administration tried to delay student loan forgiveness for nearly 180,000 borrowers. A federal court said no

The Education Department must proceed with discharging student loan forgiveness for a group of eligible borrowers in a settlement case after a recent ruling from a federal appeals court.

The Friday decision marked a win for about 179,000 borrowers in the drawn-out Sweet v. McMahon settlement. In the ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rejected an appeal from the Department of Education to alter the initial settlement timeline since they hadn’t expected a large amount of applications for loan relief. The borrowers applied in a five-month window stretching from June to Nov. 2022.

Advertisement

“Once again, the courts have rejected the Department’s attempts to evade its obligations to borrowers who have waited far too long for the relief they are owed,” Eileen Connor, the Executive Director of the Project on Predatory Student Lending, said in a statement. The advocacy group is the plaintiff representing borrowers in the years-long case.

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

What the latest Sweet v. McMahon settlement decision said

The federal court laid out a sequence of events stating that the Education Department knew that 179,000 post-class applicants were in line for relief when it asked the federal court to green-light the settlement in Sept. 2022. The court said that the agency didn’t object to the terms until about three years later.

The three-judge panel wrote that the Education Department had failed to demonstrate that enough circumstances had changed to warrant modifying the settlement and it “understood the implications” of agreeing to the terms in the first place.

The 2022 decision — originally under the Biden administration — amounted to one of the largest settlements in U.S. history that eventually grew to $23 billion. It was awarded to borrowers who said they had been defrauded or misled by their colleges regarding the price tag, accreditation of their institution, or job prospects after graduation. Most of them had attended for-profit colleges or vocational programs.

The class-action lawsuit was first filed in 2019 on borrowers’ behalf against the Education Department. It accused the agency of botching applications from borrowers desiring loan forgiveness based on their colleges’ misconduct.

Three years later, a federal court set in motion for the borrowers to receive loan relief. Borrowers were classified into three pools, starting with the first group of 200,000 people who qualified for automatic relief if they attended one of the 150 colleges named in the class-action settlement. Relief in this case included loan refunds, balances wiped out and the erasure of negative credit reports.

Advertisement

Another group were borrowers who had pending relief applications by June 15, 2022. They were also entitled to decisions under a series of deadlines or else they qualify for automatic relief.

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

What’s next in the long-running settlement

The group affected by last week’s ruling were “post-class applicants,” or those who filed for relief between June 23 and Nov. 15, 2022. The Education Department originally had a deadline to issue decisions for this batch of applications by Jan. 28, 2026. They are newly entitled to a timely decision on their loan relief.

The Trump administration has proceeded with overhauling federal student loan relief programs this year. New repayment options were introduced on July 1.

However, a pair of federal judges blocked the administration from tightening eligibility to the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program which offers debt forgiveness to borrowers who end up working in government or nonprofit organizations.

You May Also Like

Share this:

Joseph Zeballos-Roig is a policy and politics journalist based in Washington D.C with a focus on economics. He is experienced in connecting the significance of events in the capital to the lives of everyday Americans whether its taxes, tariffs, interest rates or federal programs.

more from Joseph Zeballos-Roig

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.