SPY -0.89%
BND -0.66%
QQQ -1.02%
DIA -1.30%
VNQ -1.64%
GLD +0.02%
BTC -1.67%
AAPL +2.32%
GOOGL -2.07%
NVDA -3.04%
MSFT +0.04%
META +6.31%
AMZN -1.62%
TSLA -0.48%
UBER -0.11%
GS -1.48%
BAC -0.20%
JPM -0.25%
BRK.A +0.22%
COST -0.80%
XOM +2.87%
BABA -3.32%
WMT -0.10%
SPCX -1.88%
DIS -0.03%
F -0.61%
  • Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
Singapore's Prime Minister Lawrence Wong smiles during a joint press conference with Indonesia's President Prabowo Subianto. Yasuyoshi Chiba/AFP via Getty Images

The highest paid world leader is getting a $1 million raise, arguing it’s essential to maintain ‘quality’ leadership

Judging by the salaries of many world leaders, few get elected for the money. But Singapore is putting a different spin on public service, treating multimillion-dollar political salaries as a way to attract top talent and preserve the quality of its leadership, even as those salaries face intense public scrutiny.

As Reuters reported, Prime Minister Lawrence Wong told Parliament on Sept. 8 that the country would overhaul its political pay structure for the first time in 14 years.

Advertisement

Under the revised framework, Wong’s benchmark annual compensation will rise 64%, from S$2.2 million (USD $1.7 million) to S$3.6 million (USD $2.84 million). The increase works out to roughly USD $1.1 million at current exchange rates.

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Wong won’t collect the full increase right away. Officeholders will initially receive raises of up to 9% beginning Oct. 15, with future pay determined by their performance and responsibilities. Wong also pledged to donate his additional income to charity for the next five years.

The increases were recommended by an independent committee following years of frozen political salaries. Singapore benchmarks ministerial pay against the earnings of the country’s top 1,000 private-sector workers, with a discount applied to reflect their roles in the public service, according to the country’s Public Service Division.

Wong acknowledged that Singaporeans closely scrutinize political salaries because the sums vastly exceed what most citizens earn. The median gross monthly income for full-time employed residents was S$5,775 (USD $4,559) in 2025, according to Ministry of Manpower data cited by The Independent.

Still, Wong argued the debate over political pay extends beyond compensation.

“It is ultimately about whether Singapore will continue to have the quality of political leadership we need to take our country forward and to serve Singaporeans well in the years ahead,” he said, according to Reuters.

When running a country pays far less than running a company

Singapore’s approach is unusual, but the argument behind it is not difficult to understand. Presidents and prime ministers are entrusted with running entire countries, yet they often earn a fraction of what top corporate executives take home.

Case in point: The U.S. president receives an annual salary of $400,000. By comparison, the median compensation package for an S&P 500 CEO reached $17.7 million in 2025, according to the 2026 Equilar-Associated Press CEO Pay Study.

The gap is similarly wide in the UK, where the prime minister earns more than £174,000 (USD $235,000) a year. Even within government, 542 senior civil servants and cabinet officials earned more as of April, according to government data cited by MoneyWeek. But those salaries still pale in comparison to the median FTSE 100 CEO package, which reached £5.89 million ($8 million) in 2025, as per data from High Pay Centre, a London-based think tank.

Advertisement

In Germany, Europe’s largest economy, the chancellor earns roughly €440,000 (USD $511,000) a year. The average compensation package for a DAX CEO reached €6.9 million ($8 million) in 2025, according to MarketScreener.

Meanwhile, in Canada, the prime minister earns C$435,400 (USD $315,000) a year, according to the Library of Parliament. By comparison, average compensation among the country’s 100 highest-paid CEOs reached C$16.2 million (USD $11.7 million) in 2024, based on data collected from the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.

Must Read

The limits of Singapore’s wager

The flipside is whether taxpayers actually get better governance in return. As Reuters reported, Singapore has long defended its high political salaries not only as a way to attract capable leaders but also to deter corruption. A larger paycheck, however, guarantees neither.

In 2024, former transport minister S. Iswaran was sentenced to 12 months in prison after pleading guilty to obstructing justice and improperly accepting more than S$400,000 (USD $316,000) worth of gifts while in office. The judge said his actions threatened public trust in Singapore’s government.

There’s also a risk that tying ministerial salaries to the country’s 1,000 highest earners widens the distance between political leaders and the people they represent. Chong Ja Ian, a political scientist at the National University of Singapore, warned that it could make ministers more attuned to the wealthy than to ordinary Singaporeans.

You May Also Like

Share this:
Sam Bourgi Contributing writer

Sam Bourgi is a financial markets specialist with over a decade of experience covering investing, economics and digital assets. His work has been cited by U.S. Congress, the DOJ, the Bank for International Settlements, Bloomberg, Reuters, CNBC, Fox and Newsweek, as well as academic institutions.

more from Sam Bourgi

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.