SPY -1.07%
BND -0.32%
QQQ -0.42%
DIA -1.92%
VNQ -1.17%
GLD -1.02%
BTC -1.64%
AAPL -2.32%
GOOGL -2.85%
NVDA -2.53%
MSFT -1.46%
META +6.43%
AMZN -2.76%
TSLA +4.16%
UBER -5.43%
GS -0.77%
BAC +0.44%
JPM -1.09%
BRK.A -0.05%
COST -1.50%
XOM +2.14%
BABA -3.20%
WMT -1.30%
SPCX -0.09%
DIS -0.86%
F -3.90%
  • Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
man at computer YuriArcursPeopleimages/Envato

Adult film studio says a Meta exec torrented nearly 20,000 files on his home internet — and wants it folded into a $446M case

The term “torrenting” may sound innocuous enough, but in the digital piracy world, it can carry massive legal consequences, as one social media giant may find out.

Specifically, BitTorrent activity allegedly traced to a Meta executive’s home internet connection could become part of a sprawling copyright battle carrying as much as $446 million in potential statutory damages.

Advertisement

Adult film producer Strike 3 Holdings is seeking to link a separate John Doe copyright lawsuit to its existing case against Meta, arguing that a Reality Labs executive’s residential internet connection was associated with nearly 20,000 torrented files. Strike 3 contends that activity was connected to his work rather than personal use. Meta disputes that conclusion, arguing that the alleged residential downloads have not been tied to the company.

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Together with Counterlife Media, Strike 3 has accused Meta of downloading and distributing thousands of copyrighted adult films through BitTorrent, allegedly to acquire material for training its artificial intelligence systems. Meta has denied that the alleged torrenting was conducted for AI training.

The amended lawsuit involves 2,973 films, putting potential statutory damages at approximately $446 million if Strike 3 and Counterlife ultimately prove willful infringement and qualify for the maximum statutory award for each work.

BitTorrent itself isn’t illegal. It’s a peer-to-peer file-sharing protocol that lets users download and upload pieces of files directly between computers rather than relying on a single centralized server. But the technology has long been used to distribute copyrighted movies, television shows, video games, and other material without authorization, potentially exposing users to copyright infringement claims.

3 takeaways from the MetaStrike 3 legal fracas

Legal experts say the BitTorrent issue alone complicates an already complex case. Here’s how they’re breaking it all down.

The BitTorrent angle may work against Meta

The sheer volume of downloads might suggest misappropriation for AI training. “An ordinary user simply could not consume that volume of material,” Alan Harrison, an intellectual property law attorney at Sandollar Law, told Moneywise. “Discovery of file transfers onward from the executive’s home network could easily prove that the downloaded material was forwarded to Meta Labs for training.”

Circumstantial evidence can be great in front of a jury

Jurors can typically draw inferences to form a coherent story, and the Strike 3 case could be the same. “The allegation that similar activity previously was happening through Meta corporate IPs, and then the timing of the alleged shift to the exec’s residence, is suggestive either of infringement by the corporation, or misuse of the corporate IP by the exec for obsessive private collection of porn,” Harrison, who’s defended Strike 3 allegations for clients, said. “Note the volume weighs against actual consumption of all the material.”

Strike 3 attorneys may have an inquiry advantage

Given the current allegations against the Meta executive, this should leave many doors open for discovery.

“Timing and content of inbound and outbound connections from the Meta executive’s residence and from Meta Labs are open to inquiry,” Harrison noted. “For technical reasons, not all of the information that Strike 3 wants may actually be obtainable.”

The insinuation that the unnamed Meta executive, cited as “John Doe” in the court docket, was uncovered in Strike 3’s internal investigation and listed as working in Meta’s Reality Labs division. In its legal filing, the company noted the executive’s LinkedIn profile and indicated he’d worked at Meta over the past 10 years.

Strike 3’s legal team also filed a timeline in its case document citing forensic evidence of BitTorrent activity on March 20, 2025, in an email from Strike 3’s general counsel to Meta’s attorneys. The email cited notable BitTorrent activity on Meta’s company IP Address, according to TorrentFreak reporting.

“Just hours later, Strike 3 first recorded BitTorrent infringement on John Doe’s residential IP Address,” court document motion noted. “This may suggest that Meta desired to shift infringing activity to this hidden residential IP Address in order to prevent further detection,” Strike 3 stated.

Must Read

The case is moving on

One Northern District of California federal court judge has already weighed in on the case, rejecting Meta’s bid to dismiss the copyright infringement lawsuit, ruling last June that the social media company’s explanation on the downloaded files “strains credulity.”

A Meta spokesperson stated that “[they] do not believe Strike 3’s claims are accurate,” but the company has yet to provide any further comment.

You May Also Like

Share this:

A former Wall Street bond trader, Brian O'Connell is the author of two best-selling books: “The 401k Millionaire” and “CNBC’s Creating Wealth.” His work is featured on national finance and business platforms like TheStreet.com, CBS News, CNN, The Wall Street Journal and Forbes.

more from Brian O’Connell

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.