SPY -0.33%
BND -0.19%
QQQ +0.46%
DIA -0.96%
VNQ -1.02%
GLD +1.32%
BTC +0.52%
AAPL -1.58%
GOOGL +1.93%
NVDA -0.14%
MSFT +0.81%
META +1.17%
AMZN +1.26%
TSLA -1.05%
UBER +0.78%
GS -1.56%
BAC -1.77%
JPM -1.59%
BRK.A -0.91%
COST -1.19%
XOM -0.81%
BABA -0.93%
WMT -3.61%
SPCX +3.57%
DIS -0.59%
F -2.51%
  • Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani speaks during a news conference. Angela Weiss/AFP via Getty Images

Why NYC Mayor Mamdani’s pied-à-terre tax just hit a roadblock: ‘Homeowners are being substantially harmed’

New York City’s pied-a-terre tax on luxury second homes has hit a roadblock after a Staten Island judge ruled the rollout of the controversial tax needs to be redone.

In July, the city’s Department of Finance (DOF) website posted a tax roll that included the names and addresses of over 900,000 New York City homeowners. Many were not even subject to the tax.

Advertisement

Homeowners sued the city in August over the publication of the list, which they said caused “mass confusion” and “facilitated, invited and amplified unwanted scrutiny of homeowners’ personal information.”

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

The lawsuit

The suit did not challenge the legality of the tax. Instead, it targeted the rollout, which it argued put the burden on homeowners to prove their residency status. The suit included three petitioners who claimed the city incorrectly listed their homes as potential targets of the tax despite it being their primary residence.

Judge Wayne M. Ozzi ruled on Sept. 29 that the tax roll must be removed from the city website and replaced with a secondary roll that more accurately reflects the properties that are legitimately subject to the tax.

“No crime is involved here, but homeowners are being substantially harmed and penalized needlessly by DOF’s method of implementing the tax law,” Justice Ozzi wrote, according to Business Insider.

The city also sent about 17,000 letters to residents notifying them that they’d either need to file for an exemption or be hit with the tax. Judge Ozzi ruled those notices must also be cancelled and mailed again in compliance with a new list of rules.

“We’re gratified that the court has recognized we were right all along,” Randy Mastro, an attorney representing the plaintiffs, said in a statement, according to CNN. “The fact is that this administration failed to follow state law when it burdened New York City homeowners with proving they live in their own homes or be on the hook for paying a new surcharge.”

Must Read

The city responds

The controversial tax was part of Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s fiscal year budget for 2027. It will place a surcharge on non-primary residences in the city that are valued over $5 million, as well as co-ops valued at $1 million or more.

Advertisement

The tax has been met with significant backlash, with critics arguing it will destroy competition and business in the city as it drives out wealthy residents. But the mayor’s office says the tax will raise $500 million annually and help close the city’s budget gap.

In response to Justice Ozzi’s ruling, the city has invoked a stay, meaning the tax will still appear on tax bills and have to be paid by Jan. 1, 2027. The city has also filed an appeal against the decision.

The mayor’s office did not respond to Moneywise’s request for comment in time for publication, but a spokesperson for the mayor released a statement saying the decision was “wrong.”

“The pied-à-terre surcharge is about a basic principle of fairness: if you can afford a luxury second home in New York City, you can afford to pay your fair share for the schools, streets and parks that make this city work,” said Matt Rauschenbach, deputy press secretary for Mayor Mamdani, according to CNN. “The ultra wealthy are fighting in court to avoid paying their fair share. They have filed lawsuit after lawsuit to protect their privilege, and we will not back down.”

You May Also Like

Share this:
Rinna Diamantakos Contributing Editor

Rinna Diamantakos is a contributing editor at Moneywise.com. A versatile journalist, she has experience as a writer, editor and producer. Her work has focused on politics, business and financial news.

more from Rinna Diamantakos

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.