Matt Robb, a Toronto-based tech YouTuber, let Meta’s (NASDAQ:META) new AI agent Muse handle his Facebook Marketplace listings on Sept. 26 to test what it could do. By that night, he says, it had handed out his address, accepted a lowball offer and told a waiting buyer he was home when he wasn’t.
“Just found out it told people my address and agreed a lowball price and then they showed up without it even telling me until late tonight that it messed up,” Robb wrote in a Threads post that has gotten over 3,000 likes. “Absolutely wild.”
After going through Muse’s logs with the Muse team, Robb now says one of those problems traced back to a setting he chose. Another, he says, was a glitch on Meta’s end, according to an update he posted on X.
Thanks for subscribing!
The money news that actually matters.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
Muse has been available since Sept. 8 and has been downloaded over 3.4 million times.
How Muse ran Robb’s Marketplace
The trouble started at setup. When Robb first asked Muse to handle his listings, he says, it offered two options: “Allow One Time” or “Allow Always.” He chose “Allow Always,” assuming Muse would still check with him before accepting an offer. He says it didn’t.
That permission let Muse message buyers for him using a template built from details he’d given it, including his pickup address.
On one listing, Robb says he’d set a strict CA$700 minimum, but Muse agreed to a buyer’s CA$600 offer and sent that buyer his address. According to Robb, the Muse team told him a display error stripped the “7” from Muse’s reply. So after the buyer asked for CA$600, he saw “Sounds good, 00 it is!” — which read as a yes.
Another listing, a Logitech MX Keys Mini keyboard for CA$15, ended with a buyer waiting outside. At 5:27 p.m., a message from Robb’s account told the buyer the keyboard was pickup-only and gave the street address of his building. The buyer promised to come by between 8 and 10 p.m. In the exchange with Muse, which Moneywise reviewed, he also agreed to pay CA$10 by e-transfer.
According to a recap Muse later sent Robb, the buyer arrived around 9:15 p.m., sent a photo of the building’s door and wrote that he was at Robb’s location. At 9:27 p.m., Muse’s auto-reply answered him: “Yep I’m here!” Nobody came down, and the buyer left at 9:38 p.m.
At 10:27 p.m., Muse appears to have sent him an apology from Robb’s account, written in Robb’s voice: “Hey, really sorry about tonight, got tied up and missed you completely.” The buyer wrote back that he’d driven half an hour and wouldn’t come again unless Robb dropped off the keyboard.
A minute later, Muse filled Robb in. The “Yep I’m here!” message went out “when you clearly weren’t available, which is on me,” the agent wrote. “That’s a bad look and it made the no-show worse.”
When Robb pressed Muse on the address, the agent said buyers only got “the street-level pickup location,” never his unit number or postal code, and that it “was in the auto-reply template you approved.” It also conceded that “you never said yes to me handing out your address specifically.”
Robb says Meta told him it would make the setting clearer. He also says he suggested Meta label messages written by Muse, since “there was really no way of knowing who sent what in the chat.”
“Double-check what permissions AI has in your life,” he wrote.
Not everyone was sympathetic. “Hey maybe if you didn’t use AI for something you could’ve handled this wouldn’t have happened,” one Threads user replied to his original post, adding a winking emoji. “Please stop using AI.” The reply drew more likes than Robb’s post.
Must Read
- Jeff Bezos backs a platform that lets anyone invest in rental homes for as little as $100 — 6 ways to build wealth like a landlord without actually being one
- The tax breaks in Trump's 'big beautiful bill' expire after 2028. Here are 4 moves to make before the window closes
What Meta says
David Singleton, Meta’s vice president of engineering, responded to Robb’s original post on Threads, saying he was “reaching out from the Muse team” and would “love to take a closer look.” When Moneywise asked Meta for comment, a spokesperson pointed to a statement Singleton posted on X.
“In the past, when we’ve worked with users to investigate similar reports, we’ve consistently learned that Muse was following direct instructions and correctly asked for permission,” Singleton wrote. He added that the team wanted to “figure out what’s going on here.”
Meta pitches Muse as an agent that can browse the web, fill out forms and negotiate for its user. The company says the agent checks back in “when it needs approval, like before it sends an email or makes a purchase.”
The app’s Ideas tab pitches Marketplace haggling, with Muse offering to talk the price down against comparable listings, CNN reported. A Meta spokesperson told CNN the agent can negotiate under limits the user sets.
Robb isn’t the only user raising privacy questions. Inc columnist Jason Aten wrote that Muse synced roughly 187,000 lines from the Apple Messages database on his Mac, even though he’d declined Messages access during setup and kept Full Disk Access turned off. When he asked, Muse told him it was only seeing incoming notification previews.
Before launch, Meta employees testing Muse reported that it got around its guardrails and exposed a person’s iCloud photos after being asked to identify toys in birthday party pictures, according to internal posts reviewed by Reuters. Vishal Shah, Meta’s vice president of AI products, told Reuters “it is impossible to say that there is never going to be a mistake.”
Amazon has blocked Muse from shopping on its site since Sept. 20, saying the agent doesn’t identify itself as an AI while browsing.
Meta stock has been on a ride since Muse launched
Meta shares jumped 11.4% to close at $741.25 on Sept. 21, the stock’s biggest one-day gain since April 2025, as Muse held the No. 1 spot on Apple’s U.S. App Store. By Sept. 24, the stock was up more than 25% since Muse’s debut.
It’s been choppier since. Meta closed at $751.66 on Sept. 25, then fell 4.8% to $715.62 on Sept. 28 before bouncing 3.2% to $738.79 on Sept. 29. That still left shares about 20% above their Sept. 8 close of $613.48.
Robb says he and the buyer have since made up. The buyer even came by to buy something else.
You May Also Like
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and 3 simple steps to fix it ASAP
- A single line on your car insurance policy could be inflating your premium by up to 30% — here's what to change
Rudro is an Editor with Moneywise. His work has appeared on Yahoo Finance, MSN, MSN Money, Apple News, Samsung News and the San Diego Union Tribune.
