Minnesota’s Largest Candy Store prides itself on offering “every conceivable candy,” according to its owner Robert Wagner. That very commitment to offering so many sugary treats recently led to a troubling legal challenge.
According to Fox 9 KSPM, the story began in July, when Minnesota’s Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement (AGE) Division received an anonymous complaint. The issue centered around alcohol-infused sweets, like Jack Daniel’s candy bars and brandy cherries, on the candy store’s shelves. According to the complainant’s allegations, Minnesota’s Largest Candy Store illegally had these “liquor candies” in its store and sold them to minors.
When undercover agents investigated the matter, they found a “section dedicated to alcoholic beverage candies and confections.” Since Robert Wagner doesn’t have a liquor license, the state charged him with a gross misdemeanor. Wagner is now facing a maximum jail time of 364 days and $3,000 in fines.
Thanks for subscribing!
The money news that actually matters.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
But the store’s owner seems to be capitalizing on his sour state of affairs. Visitors can now take selfies by a sign with this store’s temporary new name: “Minnesota’s Most Wanted Candy Store.”
Moneywise reached out to Minnesota’s AGE for more details. Since the case remains open, they declined to comment.
Wagner disagrees with AGE’s allegations
In an interview with Fox 9, Robert Wagner appeared to be blindsided by what he believes are unjust charges.
According to Wagner, he didn’t think it was a requirement to hold a liquor permit just to sell alcohol-infused candies in his shop. As he viewed it, “My reading of the law states I can have them in the candy store. That is my reading of the law.” Wagner added that if he truly thought he was violating state law, then he “wouldn’t put it on a shelf for 650,000 customers to walk by and view.”
Beyond the claims against him, Wagner was annoyed at how the state led this sting. Rather than an undercover investigation, the store owner would have preferred to settle the dispute in the open with an old-fashioned conversation. “It just doesn’t feel like this is the relationship between the state and a taxpayer,” Wagner argued.
While they were scoping his shop for illicit goodies, Wagner said the officers “could have stopped and talked to me and said, ‘Hey Robert, we don’t think you can sell this candy.’” If Wagner agreed with their reasoning, then he says he would have complied.
As it stands today, Fox 9 reports that Wagner removed all of these controversial liquor candies from Minnesota’s Largest Candy Shop.
Must Read
- Jeff Bezos backs a platform that lets anyone invest in rental homes for as little as $100 — 6 ways to build wealth like a landlord without actually being one
- The tax breaks in Trump's 'big beautiful bill' expire after 2028. Here are 4 moves to make before the window closes
Are liquor candies really illegal?
The legality of liquor candies seems like it’d be a cut-and-dry case of “yes” or “no.” However, after digging into the minutiae of the Minnesota Statutes, there are some complexities surrounding these confections.
The most important section that may favor Wagner is Minnesota Statutes § 31.76. This law provides a clear definition of “confections containing alcohol,” as well as the candy shops that can legally sell them without a license.
To qualify, these particular candies need three characteristics:
- They have no more than 5% alcohol by volume.
- The alcohol is in a nonliquid form (i.e., it’s mixed with other ingredients during manufacturing).
- The candies aren’t “liqueur-filled.”
If the products in a candy store meet all of these requirements, a candy store could sell them to adults. There just have to be plenty of warning labels making it clear they have 5% alcohol and that they’re only for people over 21.
However, there’s one more crucial requirement: Over 50% of the candy shop’s gross sales need to come from confections.
So, what about these “liqueur-filled candies?” That’s a completely different category with a different set of laws.
Minnesota Statutes § 340A.101 makes it clear these treats have “more than one-half of one percent alcohol by volume in liquid form that is intended for or capable of beverage use.” Statute §340A.908 states these are strictly for sale in a licensed “liquor store.”
Setting aside allegations of selling to minors, the legality of Wagner’s alcoholic assortment really depends on what he sold. For instance, chocolates with 5% or less alcohol in a nonliquid form are a-OK — provided he has over 50% confectionery sales and took proper care to warn and screen customers before purchase. However, if there were any liquid-filled products like rum or whiskey chocolates, this sweet shop could be in a sticky situation.
You May Also Like
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and 3 simple steps to fix it ASAP
- A single line on your car insurance policy could be inflating your premium by up to 30% — here's what to change
Eric Esposito is a US based contributor on Moneywise who loves making financial topics accessible and understandable to readers. In addition to Moneywise, Eric’s work can be found in publications such as WallStreetZen and CoinDesk.
