Whether you’re a Democrat, Republican or Independent, odds are you’re not a fan of politicians purchasing stocks.
Few issues have as much widespread support as ending stock picking on Capitol Hill. A University of Maryland survey found that 86% of respondents want an outright ban on stock trading for members of Congress. If American voters had their way, they’d also keep the president, vice president and Supreme Court justices from swapping shares.
The reason for this widespread distaste is obvious: Politicians are privy to a lot of sensitive information. In fact, a previous New York Times investigation identified 97 lawmakers or relatives who made trades related to their committees.
Thanks for subscribing!
Invest smarter with our free newsletter.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
Even though the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act of 2012 technically makes insider trading for Congresspeople illegal, enforcement remains a bit iffy and many people argue it doesn’t go nearly far enough.
On the positive side, the STOCK Act created more transparency. Members of Congress have to file their trades as Periodic Transaction Reports (PTRs) within 30 days of receiving notification of the transaction.
This wealth of information makes “Congressional copy-trading” a reality for people who want to trade like Representative Nancy Pelosi or others — and some companies have already created products that trade like politicians.
The ETFs that mimic Congressional stock pickers
The website Unusual Whales had already gained attention by publishing congressional stock disclosures before it created two exchange-traded funds (ETFs) using this data. Released alongside Subversive Capital Advisor, these actively managed ETFs entered the stock market in 2023 as the Subversive Congressional Democrats Trading ETF (BZX:NANC) Subversive Congressional Republicans Trading ETF (BZX:GOP).
Although Unusual Whales announced on X that it’s no longer part of these ETFs, the products are still available under the management of Tidal Financial Group.
According to their official website, Subversive ETFs use publicly available trading data to create funds that mimic the activities of U.S. lawmakers.
Dan Weiskopf, the co-portfolio manager of the Subversive ETFs, told Moneywise that Tidal Financial Group works to “identify clusters or patterns of buys and sells across individual members of Congress.” In particular, Weiskopf said Subversive ETFs focus on times when Congress members “buy a second and third time into weakness and strength” since “these are active decisions by members of Congress who believe they have an edge.”
He shared one specific example of this strategy focused on when U.S. Senator Dave McCormick made a large bet on spot Bitcoin ETFs. As Weiskopf noted, “The Honorable McCormick ran Bridgewater for Ray Dalio and was also on the Digital Asset Subcommittee as lobbyists were helping to form new policy.”
So how well have these ETFs performed? Since their 2023 launch, NANC is up over 100%, while GOP has climbed 70%.
Note that if you held the S&P 500 through an ETF like the SPY, you would have been up roughly 98% between the start of 2023 and November 2026.
Must Read
- Jeff Bezos backs a platform that lets anyone invest in rental homes for as little as $100 — 6 ways to build wealth like a landlord without actually being one
- The tax breaks in Trump's 'big beautiful bill' expire after 2028. Here are 4 moves to make before the window closes
Will Congressional ETFs really give you an edge?
With gains similar to the S&P 500, some may wonder whether these niche ETFs are really worth the cost.
According to Weiskopf, it all comes down to how much you value Congressional intel. Weiskopf told Moneywise, “We think logical buyers of NANC and GOP are those who believe that members of Congress are ‘smart money’ to follow. Many members of Congress have a great deal of experience in investing, have a unique position in understanding policy as it develops and are careful about how they take risks.”
Put another way, Weiskopf reasoned, “If we trust them enough to manage our country, why wouldn’t we want to capitalize on how they invest given their insights and experience?”
Keep in mind that actively managed ETFs often come with higher fees than passive index funds. Currently, the expense ratios for NANC and GOP are at 0.72% and 0.73%, respectively. That may not seem like much, but compare it with something like the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA:SPY) at under 0.0945% or Vanguard’s S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA:VOO) at 0.03%.
Granted, Subversive’s ETFs don’t have as much historical price data, so there’s no way to tell whether they’ll outperform the S&P 500 down the line. But even if they do, investors have to cut out this higher fee in their profit calculations.
If you don’t mind getting more proactive, remember that buys and sells by elected officials are publicly viewable. You could start with official financial disclosure databases for the House of Representatives and the Senate. A few online resources like Open America and Publicfilings.org also make it even easier to see how leaders are moving their money.
You May Also Like
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and 3 simple steps to fix it ASAP
- A single line on your car insurance policy could be inflating your premium by up to 30% — here's what to change
Eric Esposito is a US based contributor on Moneywise who loves making financial topics accessible and understandable to readers. In addition to Moneywise, Eric’s work can be found in publications such as WallStreetZen and CoinDesk.
