SPY +0.71%
BND -0.38%
QQQ +1.58%
DIA -0.35%
VNQ -1.14%
GLD -0.72%
BTC +0.76%
AAPL +1.25%
GOOGL +0.68%
NVDA +3.09%
MSFT +1.62%
META -1.51%
AMZN +1.91%
TSLA +5.27%
UBER -1.89%
GS -1.40%
BAC -2.18%
JPM -0.69%
BRK.A +0.19%
COST -0.51%
XOM +1.83%
BABA -1.74%
WMT -2.36%
SPCX +6.62%
DIS -3.23%
F -1.46%
  • Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
Mark Cuban speaking at an event. Anna Webber/Getty Images for Inc. at Inc. Founders House at SXSW)

Mark Cuban still isn't a fan of human-like robots in the house: 'Would you rather have a Roomba or a humanoid that pushes around a vacuum cleaner?'

Billionaire Mark Cuban is taking direct aim at humanoid robots and using social media to make his point.

“Before microwaves, dishwashers and washing machines, there weren’t spaces for them,” he wrote in a Sept. 28 post on X. “Then boom. The house design changed. Didn’t have to tear down the house. You optimized it for the devices that did the best job. Same will happen with robots. It’s hard to make a humanoid robot multi-function. Harder to make it do multiple jobs from one command. They are big. Would you rather have a Roomba or a humanoid that pushes around a vacuum cleaner or broom?”

Advertisement

In a separate post that same day, Cuban noted the limitations of humanoids. “You won’t see humanoids with a washboard and a tub of water offered as an alternative to a washer or dryer,” he wrote.

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Humanoids may be an “unnecessarily complex and expensive solution”

Technology experts say Cuban has a point.

“Even though exciting, with the current state of technology, it’s hard not to agree with Cuban’s argument,” Mihaela Becheru, a partner at Digital Trust Advisors, told Moneywise.

Yet humanoid robots are having a major pop culture moment, driven partly by the public’s fascination with science fiction and partly by the PR hype that companies such as Tesla, with its Optimus robot, have brought to the category, Becheru noted. “Even though impractical, there is something inherently compelling about seeing AI take human form,” she said.

From an engineering and economic standpoint, Becheru said that using a sophisticated humanoid robot for basic household chores is currently an unnecessarily complex and expensive solution. “Humanoid robots are still very costly to manufacture, difficult to coordinate, and hard to operate safely in highly unpredictable household environments,” she added.

Having worked with innovators across robotics, drones and AI, Becheru said she’s seen enormous interest in household bots from investors, media and consumers. “But for many practical applications today, a combination of IoT, specialized robotics and automated appliances can perform specific tasks more efficiently and at a fraction of the cost,” she noted.

Must Read

The bot-building sector takes a decidedly different view from Cuban

Industry executives say the future likely isn’t one robot form replacing every other robot.

Advertisement

“We believe it’s shared intelligence operating across multiple forms, with the right physical platform matched to the right task,” Jerry Wang, global executive chairman at robotics manufacturer Faraday Future, told Moneywise.

Wang also believes a humanoid has an important long-term advantage because much of the world has been designed for humans. “A sufficiently capable humanoid can potentially use the same tools, navigate the same spaces and perform a wide range of tasks without requiring the environment to be completely redesigned,” he noted. “Our approach is to develop a common intelligence layer that can support multiple forms and capabilities, rather than assuming that a single hardware form is optimal for every job.”

Cuban predicts homes will eventually be redesigned around robots, much as kitchens and laundry rooms evolved around refrigerators, dishwashers and washing machines. Wang believes humanoids already fit into these spaces.

“We think one of the advantages of humanoid robotics is precisely that homes and workplaces are already designed around the human form,” he said. “Doors, countertops, tools, stairs and many everyday objects were built for people, so the ultimate goal should be for increasingly capable humanoids to adapt to human environments rather than requiring consumers to rebuild their homes around robots.”

Wang believes that, in the future, consumers can expect to see more robot-friendly homes and spaces built with bots in mind. “You’ll see charging stations in garages for EVs and there may be docking stations for robots and better connectivity and better passageways for them to get around,” Wang said.

It’s still early in the household bot development market

Tech experts say a consumer-oriented humanoid robot belongs more in the early-adopter or luxury technology budget than in the household-appliance budget.

Advertisement

“For a reasonable economics analysis, a humanoid robot would need to perform a broad range of genuinely useful activities, consistently and safely, before consumers could reasonably compare its price with a vacuum cleaner, dishwasher or robotic lawn mower,” Becheru said.

Bot-buying consumers will also have to factor in repairs, subscriptions, liability and obsolescence as real costs, making a home robot look more like a car purchase than an appliance purchase.

For now, bots involve an element of social signaling in the public’s view. “Humanoid robots are currently being presented partly as futuristic objects of fascination,” Becheru said. “Tesla’s Optimus appearing in highly visible celebrity and entertainment contexts illustrates how, at this stage, the purchase is as much about novelty and status as utility.”

As they prepare for the possible robot revolution, manufacturers will have to meet consumer needs with context-aware home robots. “It has to know who is speaking, what’s happening in the room, and when to act or stay quiet,” Dani Cherkassky, CEO of the voice-activated technology company Kardome, told Moneywise.

If that awareness runs in the cloud, the robot becomes a moving, always-listening sensor that streams the most private parts of family life to someone else’s servers. “That one design choice drives several of the risks on the list: privacy, cybersecurity, subscriptions, and safety,” Cherkassky added.

You May Also Like

Share this:
Brian O’Connell Contributing Writer

Brian O'Connell is a US based former Wall Street bond trader and author of two best-selling books: "The 401k Millionaire" and "CNBC's Creating Wealth". His work is featured on national finance and business platforms like TheStreet.com, CBS News, CNN, The Wall Street Journal and Forbes

more from Brian O’Connell

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.