SPY +1.39%
BND +0.12%
QQQ +1.52%
DIA +0.75%
VNQ +0.68%
GLD +0.32%
BTC +1.60%
AAPL -0.53%
GOOGL +1.24%
NVDA +2.82%
MSFT +2.97%
META +2.04%
AMZN +1.66%
TSLA +2.73%
UBER +1.38%
GS -0.40%
BAC +0.61%
JPM -0.28%
BRK.A +0.83%
COST +1.06%
XOM +1.05%
BABA +2.84%
WMT +2.44%
SPCX +9.56%
DIS +1.46%
F +0.69%
  • Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
bill gates Kent NISHIMURA / AFP via Getty Images

Bill Gates warns AI can't police itself: ‘You can disable any monitoring of any kind. This exists today’

While many of the leaders of the artificial intelligence industry signaled last week that self-regulation would be a sufficient way to prevent catastrophic events and existential threats from their technology, Bill Gates says that sort of mindset is both dangerous and runs opposite the nation’s approach to other industrial dangers.

“We’ve created a society that tries to keep people safe, not by saying ‘we can bankrupt the person who does that,’” he said in an interview with the New York Times. “In other areas, do we just say ‘hey go ahead release your drugs. There’s no FDA. There’s no airline safety board. There’s no requirements that cars have seatbelts.’ Do we just use liability laws to try and keep humans safe? ‘Oh, you’re shipping opioids. Someone should just sue you.’”

Advertisement

Gates pointed out a growing hole in the logic of the makers of frontier AI models. Open source models wouldn’t be subject to the regulation that’s being discussed, making any protections put into place by companies like OpenAI and Anthropic moot.

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

“You can take an open source model that can create biological weapons and disable any monitoring of any kind. And this exists today,” said Gates. “There is no filtering of any kind.”

Real dangers

Gates classified AI as one of “the most dangerous things humans have ever gone near,” and believes a lack of government oversight is “just insane.”

His recent onslaught of appearances on the topic (including a recent appearance on Meet the Press) are happening because he feels that even with all the recent talk and warnings from AI insiders about the dangers, the general public still has no sense of how severe the threat actually is.

“It’s fair to say outside of the industry, the awareness of the dangers of AI is extremely low,” he said. “The only question on my mind is do we wait until a cyberattack causes massive damage or a biotech [attack from AI] causes massive damage and then the monitoring safeguards are required in these models to prevent that from happening many, many, many more times. Or can we be wise enough to … require these things to be put in before millions of deaths?”

Must Read

Growing concerns

Gates isn’t the only person tied to Microsoft who is calling for safety measures to be put into place on AI models. Microsoft vice chair and president Brad Smith, last month, said he supported the idea of a kill switch for AI. Speaking at a panel at the United Nations General Assembly, Smith said “The people who create the model should have the ability to turn it off. The Cloud infrastructure providers like us should have it. The people who put in place the controls around AI agents should be able to turn them off. And I don’t think it’s a bad thing if we have a regulation that requires that.”

And Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei spoke before the United Nations in September, asking world leaders to establish safeguards for AI before the technology becomes so advanced humans are unable to control it.

The Trump Administration disagrees, though. Trump last week said he is “seeing tremendous self-policing” in the AI industry and said the government would not get involved.

“There’s a belief that there should be tremendous self-regulation, and we automatically have regulation with the Department of Justice, the FBI, all of that,” he said. “But the self-regulation is very important.”

You May Also Like

Share this:
Chris Morris Contributing Writer

Chris Morris is a US based veteran journalist with more than 35 years of experience at many of the biggest digital news outlets. In addition to his activities as a writer, reporter and editor, Chris is also a frequent moderator and speaker at major conferences, including CES and South by Southwest.

more from Chris Morris

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.