While many of the leaders of the artificial intelligence industry signaled last week that self-regulation would be a sufficient way to prevent catastrophic events and existential threats from their technology, Bill Gates says that sort of mindset is both dangerous and runs opposite the nation’s approach to other industrial dangers.
“We’ve created a society that tries to keep people safe, not by saying ‘we can bankrupt the person who does that,’” he said in an interview with the New York Times. “In other areas, do we just say ‘hey go ahead release your drugs. There’s no FDA. There’s no airline safety board. There’s no requirements that cars have seatbelts.’ Do we just use liability laws to try and keep humans safe? ‘Oh, you’re shipping opioids. Someone should just sue you.’”
Gates pointed out a growing hole in the logic of the makers of frontier AI models. Open source models wouldn’t be subject to the regulation that’s being discussed, making any protections put into place by companies like OpenAI and Anthropic moot.
Thanks for subscribing!
The money news that actually matters.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
“You can take an open source model that can create biological weapons and disable any monitoring of any kind. And this exists today,” said Gates. “There is no filtering of any kind.”
Real dangers
Gates classified AI as one of “the most dangerous things humans have ever gone near,” and believes a lack of government oversight is “just insane.”
His recent onslaught of appearances on the topic (including a recent appearance on Meet the Press) are happening because he feels that even with all the recent talk and warnings from AI insiders about the dangers, the general public still has no sense of how severe the threat actually is.
“It’s fair to say outside of the industry, the awareness of the dangers of AI is extremely low,” he said. “The only question on my mind is do we wait until a cyberattack causes massive damage or a biotech [attack from AI] causes massive damage and then the monitoring safeguards are required in these models to prevent that from happening many, many, many more times. Or can we be wise enough to … require these things to be put in before millions of deaths?”
Must Read
- Jeff Bezos backs a platform that lets anyone invest in rental homes for as little as $100 — 6 ways to build wealth like a landlord without actually being one
- The tax breaks in Trump's 'big beautiful bill' expire after 2028. Here are 4 moves to make before the window closes
Growing concerns
Gates isn’t the only person tied to Microsoft who is calling for safety measures to be put into place on AI models. Microsoft vice chair and president Brad Smith, last month, said he supported the idea of a kill switch for AI. Speaking at a panel at the United Nations General Assembly, Smith said “The people who create the model should have the ability to turn it off. The Cloud infrastructure providers like us should have it. The people who put in place the controls around AI agents should be able to turn them off. And I don’t think it’s a bad thing if we have a regulation that requires that.”
And Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei spoke before the United Nations in September, asking world leaders to establish safeguards for AI before the technology becomes so advanced humans are unable to control it.
The Trump Administration disagrees, though. Trump last week said he is “seeing tremendous self-policing” in the AI industry and said the government would not get involved.
“There’s a belief that there should be tremendous self-regulation, and we automatically have regulation with the Department of Justice, the FBI, all of that,” he said. “But the self-regulation is very important.”
You May Also Like
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and 3 simple steps to fix it ASAP
- A single line on your car insurance policy could be inflating your premium by up to 30% — here's what to change
Chris Morris is a US based veteran journalist with more than 35 years of experience at many of the biggest digital news outlets. In addition to his activities as a writer, reporter and editor, Chris is also a frequent moderator and speaker at major conferences, including CES and South by Southwest.
