SPY +1.11%
BND +0.13%
QQQ +2.02%
DIA +0.30%
VNQ -0.04%
GLD +1.31%
BTC -1.23%
AAPL -0.46%
GOOGL -0.03%
NVDA +3.15%
MSFT +1.57%
META -2.66%
AMZN +1.42%
TSLA +8.17%
UBER -1.27%
GS +4.00%
BAC +0.30%
JPM +1.44%
BRK.A +0.24%
COST -0.71%
XOM -0.76%
BABA +0.18%
WMT -0.32%
SPCX +1.59%
DIS -2.32%
F +1.55%
  • Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Real Estate News
san francisco pius99/Getty Images/Google Earth/Realtor.com

Squatters seize $4M San Francisco house in alleged conspiracy to gain title — now it’s going on auction over $340K in unpaid taxes

Advertisement

According to Realtor.com, the home is a 3,000-square-foot residence with four bedrooms that owners Wei Wang and Xiangdong Guo purchased for almost $2.5 million in 2013 and abandoned in 2019. They added that the home is worth about $4.4 million.

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

The San Francisco Chronicle reported that the owners left “a car moldering in the driveway and a Christmas tree propped in a window” when they bailed, along with a $340,000 tax bill that’s accumulated since they’ve been gone.

Recently, however, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors paved the way for the house to head to the auction block — which is a small relief for neighbors who claim that alleged squatters who moved into the abandoned home plunged the community into “a daily nightmare.”

They took over a single home but left an entire community living in fear

Last year, two people, Diana Peng and Brandon Aadee, claimed ownership of the abandoned Sea Cliff house and allegedly “transferred the property title back and forth between each other” multiple times, including many that were forgeries.

A San Francisco Standard investigation found that Aadee has a “long history of alleged forgery, fraud and theft” while Peng has been charged with multiple felonies, including forgery and identity theft and served jail time for the latter, as well as burglary.

The investigation found that Aadee moved in first in 2025 and, after the community began complaining to authorities and organizing a neighborhood watch, he disappeared and Peng took up residence, claiming the ownership was transferred to her.

All the while neighbors have complained about black mold around the front door “causing a health hazard to attached homes” and pitbulls barking, as well as people seen “entering the property with forced entry materials (hammers, crow bars).”

Some neighbors claim to have spent “tens of thousands of dollars on private security and investigators,” while others say they’ve had property stolen. The Chronicle reported that one next-door neighbor “sleeps on the floor of his young daughter’s room at night, fearful that someone from the house could step over an abutting balcony and break in.”

And while police have responded to calls about the home, they said there’s nothing they can do because Peng “has presented official documentation from the City showing them as the current owner” and can’t be removed “unless and until there is sufficient evidence establishing otherwise and a legal basis for enforcement action.”

Advertisement

In September, David Chiu, San Francisco’s City Attorney, sued Peng and Aadee for “effectively trying to steal a house and sell it to make millions in profit. That is fraud, and they are trying to profit off that crime,” he said. The auction, meanwhile, is expected to take place this year.

Neither Chiu’s office nor the San Francisco Board of Supervisors responded to Moneywise’s request for comment, but even the upcoming auction doesn’t necessarily mean the end of the neighborhood drama.

The San Francisco Standard noted that if someone manages to scrounge up $340,000 to pay off the outstanding taxes, the auction is cancelled.

Must Read

What to do if squatters move in next door

State laws around squatters mean that it can take months, or even years, and thousands of dollars in legal fees, to evict them — especially if you have to fight their claim to the residence via documents like a disputed lease.

Advertisement

In Florida, for example, law enforcement heard the complaints from a Melbourne community about unruly squatters in one abandoned house for years but said their hands were tied because only the homeowner could order them gone — and the homeowner was dead.

And in Georgia, navigating local laws around squatting meant that it took a community 14 months to evict “party-throwing squatters.”

Squatting, meanwhile, poses a risk to those beyond the owner of the affected property. Aside from personal danger and property concerns like those outlined in the San Francisco story, homes with squatters can also negatively impact the property values of other homes in the area.

The City of Norton Shores in Michigan, for one, published an entire guide for dealing with squatters, advising that neighborhood groups try contacting the property owner or management company to alert them to the situation.

If that doesn’t work, they advise contacting police and government representatives, as well as municipal inspectors if there’s a concern about the structure of the home — which could lead to code violation tickets that force the owner to act.

Advertisement

Others suggest that notifying the utility providers could also be a way to informally evict squatters if they turn off service to the home.

Starting a neighborhood watch is another way to keep an eye on any suspicious activity, while keeping a written log of any issues you witness could serve as evidence for law enforcement.

Some companies even offer squatter-removal services, like one California service that uses various weapons, including samurai swords, to get the urgency of the removal order across. And while they, unsurprisingly, boast “a 95% success rate,” sending a stranger with a samurai sword to clear out squatters could end up putting you in the crosshairs of law enforcement.

As Los Angeles attorney Stephen Lockard told Realtor.com, “Skipping legal eviction may feel efficient in the short term, but it exposes homeowners to serious civil and even criminal liability if something goes wrong.”

You May Also Like

Share this:
Mike Crisolago Sr. Staff Reporter

Mike Crisolago is a Sr. Staff Reporter at Moneywise with nearly 20 years of experience working as a journalist, editor, content strategist and podcast host. He specializes in personal finance writing related to the 50-plus demographic and retirement, as well as politics and lifestyle content.

more from Mike Crisolago

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.