• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Real Estate News
A split-image photo of Citadel CEO Ken Griffin and his NYC penthouse youtube.com / @NYCMayorsOffice (left), gettyimages.com / Kayla Bartkowski (right)

Billionaire Ken Griffin's COO calls NYC mayor's use of his name in pied-à-terre flap 'shameful' — hints that company may halt major city project

A political clash in New York City is quickly turning into an economic flashpoint, and it could have real consequences for jobs, development and even housing affordability.

Billionaire hedge fund founder Ken Griffin is pushing back after Mayor Zohran Mamdani featured his $238 million penthouse in a social media video promoting a proposed pied-à-terre tax on luxury multiple homes (1).

Advertisement

In the video, Mamdani points to ultra-high-value properties being taxed more to help close the city's budget gap.

An internal email reviewed by The Wall Street Journal revealed Citadel COO Gerald Beeson calling the mayor's move "shameful" and warning the company may reconsider a planned multi-billion-dollar project, 350 Park Avenue, which is expected to generate 6,000 construction jobs and more than 15,000 permanent roles (2).

This highlights a growing tension in major cities: how to tax wealth without driving it — and the investment that comes with it — elsewhere.

Griffin has already shown a willingness to relocate. In 2022, he moved Citadel's headquarters from Chicago to Miami, citing concerns about crime and political leadership, according to Bloomberg (3).

The risk to a $6 billion New York project shows how sensitive major investments are to tax policy (2). And that can impact everyday consumers when these projects help drive job creation, local economies, tax revenue and housing supply.

The tax debate at the center of it all

The proposed pied-à-terre tax would apply to high-value second homes, which are typically owned by wealthy individuals who don't live in the city full-time (2).

Supporters say it could raise revenue from those least likely to feel the impact. New York City is already under fiscal pressure. It faces a projected budget gap of roughly $7 billion by 2028, CBC New York reports (4).

Advertisement

But the policy risks backfiring, according to critics and some economists, who warn larger taxes can influence where high earners live and invest. The Tax Foundation notes these folks are more likely to respond to tax changes by moving or shifting assets (5).

And the broader trend is shown in an IRS analysis cited by CNBC, which found that New York has lost billions of dollars in income to other states in recent years, with many high earners relocating to lower-tax states like Florida and Texas (6).

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

A broader trend: cities vs. wealth

New York isn't alone in trying to tax wealth more aggressively. For example, in California, lawmakers have proposed wealth taxes targeting ultra-high-net-worth residents (7). In Canada, the federal government has a luxury tax on underused homes (8).

But the Griffin dispute shows how delicate that balance can be.

Supporters argue these policies improve fairness. The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy reports the top one percent pay a lower effective state and local tax rate than many middle-income households (9).

Critics — including billionaire investor Bill Ackman — counter that these individuals already contribute heavily through things like taxes, spending and philanthropy.

Advertisement

"Non-resident owners of NYC apartments who leave (them) vacant for much of the year aren't a burden to NYC schools, services or other resources while they drive growth in retail sales, restaurants, theater and other important drivers of our economy," Ackman posted to social media (10).

The impact on everyday Americans

The standoff between Griffin and New York's mayor is a clear example of how quickly politics, wealth and real estate can collide, and how the outcome can shape the economic landscape far beyond billionaires' penthouses.

Even if you're not directly impacted by a pied-à-terre or similar tax, these policies can still shape your finances. If companies like Citadel scale back projects, the effects could ripple outward.

Reduced investment can weaken job growth

Business investment is a key driver of job creation and wage growth at the local level, meaning reduced investment can weaken labor markets.

According to the New York Building Congress, the construction sector alone supports around 140,000 city jobs and generates tens of billions in economic activity annually (11).

Tax shifts can affect who ultimately pays

Property taxes are New York City's largest single source of revenue, according to the NYC Comptroller (12).

According to the Congressional Budget Office, changes in business and high-income taxation can be partially passed on to workers and consumers through wages and prices over time (13).

Slower development can tighten housing supply

Slower development is linked to rising home prices and rents that have outpaced income growth in recent decades. And those effects can take years to reverse, Congress.gov reports (14).

Read More: Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan ‘works every single time’ to kill debt, get rich in America — and that ‘anyone’ can do it

The bottom line

Ultimately, delays or cancellations could mean fewer jobs, less tax revenue and slower economic growth and community resources.

At the same time, if cities successfully raise new revenue and retain their tax base, that money can support public services and infrastructure — a key factor in long-term affordability and quality of life.

Article Sources

We rely only on vetted sources and credible third-party reporting. For details, see our ethics and guidelines.

YouTube (1); The Wall Street Journal (2); Bloomberg (3); Citizens Budget Commission (4); Tax Foundation (5); CNBC (6); California Legislature (7); Government of Canada (8); Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (9); X (10); New York Building Congress (11); NYC Comptroller (12); Congressional Budget Office (13); Congress.gov (14)

You May Also Like

Share this:

With a writing and editing career spanning over 13 years, Emma creates and refines content across a broad spectrum of industries, including personal finance, lifestyle, travel, health & wellness, real estate, beauty & fitness and B2B/SaaS/tech. Her versatility comes through contributions to high-profile clients like Moneywise, Healthline, Narcity and Bob Vila, producing content that informs and engages, along with helping book authors tell their stories.

more from Emma Caplan-Fisher

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.