• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
A Spirit Airlines plane is seen flying in the sky. Wenjie Zheng/Shutterstock

Spirit Airlines may get a $500M government lifeline as it struggles to survive. Here’s what history says about airline bailouts

Spirit Airlines (OTCMKTS: FLYYQ) could soon get a $500 million government lifeline. This would be a rare move to prop up a single struggling carrier.

The Trump administration is reportedly weighing a loan in exchange for a potential ownership stake (1), as the ultra-low-cost airline battles rising fuel costs, heavy debt and ongoing financial instability. The airline has filed for bankruptcy twice in recent years and faces mounting pressure as fuel prices surge.

Advertisement

Government support for airlines isn't new. But historically, those interventions have been reserved for moments when the entire industry was at risk.

A rescue of Spirit may signal something different.

What history shows about airline bailouts

When Washington has stepped in to support airlines, it has typically done so during periods of widespread disruption.

After the September 11 attacks, Congress passed the Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act, which provided nearly $7 billion in grants and loan guarantees to airlines (2). The goal was to keep the nation's air travel system functioning after demand collapsed overnight.

Even with that support, several airlines still restructured or filed for bankruptcy in the years that followed.

A similar pattern played out during the COVID-19 pandemic. The federal government approved more than $50 billion in payroll support and loans for passenger airlines through the CARES Act and subsequent relief packages (3). Major carriers like Delta Air Lines, United Airlines and Southwest Airlines all participated.

In exchange, airlines issued warrants to the government, giving taxpayers a potential upside if the companies recovered. The support helped prevent mass layoffs and kept flights operating during a near-total collapse in travel demand.

Advertisement

These instances of government aid were designed to keep planes in the air nationwide, not to preserve any one airline's business model. That's what makes the current situation stand out.

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

Why a Spirit bailout would mark a different kind of government intervention

A potential rescue of Spirit Airlines would be unusual not just because of the airline's financial struggles, but because of how targeted the support could be. Rather than stepping in during a full-scale industry crisis, the government would be backing a single carrier and potentially taking a direct ownership stake in the process. (4)

As unusual as this may be, it's not the first instance to occur during this administration. The Trump administration has already taken a more hands-on approach to supporting private companies it considers strategically important. Last year, the federal government became the largest shareholder in Intel, acquiring nearly a 10% stake by converting billions of dollars in CHIPS Act funding into equity (5).

Federal agencies have also backed other parts of the supply chain. The Commerce Department struck a deal to take a stake in a rare-earth metals producer (6), while the Pentagon invested in another mining company tied to critical materials (7).

Taken together, those moves suggest that, instead of acting primarily as a lender of last resort during emergencies, the government is increasingly positioning itself as a direct investor, picking companies it sees as vital to jobs, supply chains or economic stability.

For travelers, the immediate impact of a Spirit rescue may not be obvious. But the bigger question is what comes next. If government support becomes more targeted, it could reshape how companies compete, and which ones survive long enough to keep prices low.

Article Sources

We rely only on vetted sources and credible third-party reporting. For details, see our ethics and guidelines.

The Wall Street Journal (1),(4); American Action Forum (2); U.S. Department of the Treasury (3); Intel (5); The New York Times (6); The Washington Post (7)

You May Also Like

Share this:
Clay Halton Associate Editor

Clay Halton is a Content Editor at Moneywise.com. With a professional background in finance editing and writing, Clay specializes in making complex financial topics accessible to readers.

more from Clay Halton

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.