AAPL -0.52%
AMZN -0.22%
BABA -8.83%
BAC -0.11%
BND -0.11%
BRK.A -0.15%
BTC +6.00%
COST +1.48%
DIA +0.89%
DIS +0.19%
F +3.00%
GLD +1.95%
GOOGL +1.30%
GS +3.72%
JNJ +1.36%
JPM +0.13%
META +1.30%
MSFT +0.51%
NKE +1.34%
NVDA -0.68%
QQQ +0.47%
SPCX +2.05%
SPY +0.41%
TSLA +5.45%
UBER +0.38%
VNQ -0.10%
WMT -0.16%
XOM -0.57%
  • Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Economy
A farmer repairs aging harvesting equipment. Slatan/Shutterstock

‘It's your time or your money': New farm equipment costs up to $1 million — so farmers make do with 70s gear needing constant repairs

A new top-end combine harvester for farmers in the U.S. now lists for as much as $1 million — more than what most Americans will ever spend on a house.

Dennis Kellogg, a farmer in Ithaca, Michigan, farms soybeans on a land his family has worked for six generations. His old combine dates to the 1970s, and he’s planning to run it on his field again this fall, rather than spend down the cash the farm needs to operate.

Advertisement

“It’s your time or your money,” Kellogg told Harvest Public Media.

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture expects net farm income to slip to $153.4 billion this year — a 2.6% decline once inflation is counted, with total cash receipts falling $14.2 billion. Also, the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ producer price index for agricultural machinery hit a record 331.1 in July, up about 37% from January 2020.

If you search John Deere’s top-end X9 combine on TractorHouse, you’ll find asking prices as high as $1 million. So it’s no surprise that farmers are holding off. Combine sales have fallen 56.1% in May from a year earlier, and tractor sales have dropped 21.6%, according to the Association of Equipment Manufacturers.

Kellogg would purchase newer machinery if his budget allowed, but it doesn’t. He told Harvest Public Media the farm’s operating money is finite, and some of it has to stay untouched in case there’s a problem with this year’s crop.

So his property is dotted with retired trucks, pulleys and tillage gear, and when a machine breaks he goes hunting through the pile. Parts from one manufacturer, he’s found, often fit another. He pointed to one machine he picked up at scrap value that handles the same work, he said, as a brand-new unit in the $40,000 to $50,000 range.

Old machines can still compete, up to a point

Until a few decades ago, every wave of new technology left the previous generation of tractors and combines behind, so farms tended to run newer iron, Drew Kientzy, an agriculture research analyst at the University of Missouri, told Harvest Public Media. That changed around the mid-90s, he said, when the basic layout of the machines stopped changing much. A combine from the 1970s may still do the job.

Retrofits help too. Kientzy said the ability to add modern technology to older machines is a big reason older equipment can hold its own. Those add-ons carry a price, though, and for some operations, the benefits may not justify the costs.

Donnie Edwards farms roughly 2,000 acres of row crops in Paducah, Kentucky. Putting computer systems across his combine, tractor and sprayer would cost another $100,000, he told Harvest Public Media, and he doesn’t see the extra revenue to justify it. Because he and his son also own a repair shop, fixing used equipment in-house is more practical for them than it would be for most farms.

That’s no small advantage in an industry where John Deere agreed in April to pay $99 million to settle claims it locked farmers out of fixing their own machines.

Advertisement

Edwards hasn’t sworn off spending where it pays. He hired a drone operator this year to apply fungicide, and said the extra cost was justified by how much faster the job got done.

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

The trade-off farmers are weighing

There is, however, a downside to running only aging machines: you give up efficiency, Doug Houser, a digital agriculture specialist at Iowa State University Extension, told Harvest Public Media. Plenty of operations, he said, are reassessing what they run and weighing a move into newer used machines instead of anything fresh off the lot.

Another way around the combine bill is to pay someone else to bring in the crop. Laura Haffner’s company, High Plains Harvesting, travels to farms between Texas and North Dakota with its own machines and the crews trained to run them, so the farmer isn’t hiring seasonal help on top of renting iron. For a farmer unwilling to finance an expensive upgrade, she told Harvest Public Media, that renting can end up coming out cheaper — and the savings don’t stop at the purchase price.

A farm that doesn’t own the combine isn’t paying to service it each year, or fueling it, or staffing it. The going rate looks modest next to a combine’s sticker price: Iowa State University’s 2026 custom rate survey puts the median charge for combining corn at $45 an acre and soybeans at $42. A combine earns its keep for a few weeks and then sits, Haffner said.

What this means for farmers

For now, farmers like Kellogg have found that keeping a wrench in hand keeps a bank loan off the books, and that’s likely to hold until margins recover. Fixing your own equipment has costs in terms of time on repairs, and raises the odds of a breakdown mid-season. What it doesn’t cost is a loan payment on a machine that spends most of the year parked.

You May Also Like

Share this:

Godwin Oluponmile is a content specialist, SEO strategist and copywriter with seven years of expertise in finance, Web 3.0, B2B SaaS and technology. His work has been featured in publications such as Entrepreneur, HackerNoon, Blocktelegraph and Benzinga.

more from Godwin Oluponmile

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.