Can a U.S. president send $500 rebate checks to Americans who the White House says were erroneously overcharged via the Affordable Care Act?
President Donald Trump thinks he can and is already issuing those funds, even as critics label the move a pre-midterm election political stunt.
“The Biden Administration overcharged Americans through Obamacare plan exchange “user fees” that were passed on to consumers in the form of higher premiums, funding the operations of the federal Obamacare exchange far in excess of what was needed to run the exchange,” The White House stated in a September 10 post. As a result, the Biden Administration accumulated a significant surplus of funds that were not used to benefit the Americans who paid these higher premiums.”
Thanks for subscribing!
The insurance clarity you've been missing.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
The Trump administration said it will send the $500 refunds to one million Americans in 30 states in October, representing about 5% of all Americans who’ve signed up for coverage through the U.S. government’s HealthCare.gov exchange.
“What an absolute joke,” Brad Woodhouse, president of Protect Our Care, a Democrat-aligned health care advocacy group, noted in a statement. “Five hundred dollars is a drop in the bucket compared to what Americans are paying because Trump and Republicans gutted health care to bankroll massive tax breaks for billionaires and big corporations.”
3 things to know about the $500 ACA payments
Healthcare experts say there’s more to the payments than meets the eye, with these three factors topping the list.
1. It’s not really $500 per payee
The targeted payout group is marketplace enrollees who do not receive premium assistance, but the White House hasn’t clarified how consumers will verify their eligibility or contest a decision.
“The important distinction is that this does not appear to mean that each person individually overpaid $500,” Josh Schultz, head of government affairs at Softheon, a health coverage infrastructure company, told Moneywise.
Because the issuer fee is a percentage of the premium, the amount paid varies by enrollee, Schultz noted. “Based on what’s been released so far, I’d describe the check as a flat payment from what the administration says is an aggregate surplus, not a refund of individual documented overpayments,” he said.
2. How the funding works
Insurers that participate in HealthCare.gov pay the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) a monthly user fee equal to a percentage of premiums.
“The 2026 federal marketplace rate is 2.5%; the administration is decreasing the fee to 1.9% of premium for 2027,” Schultz said. “Consumers don’t see a separate charge for this fee as it’s incorporated into premiums.”
The bigger unanswered question is how the administration intends to move money from the existing user-free account to individual consumers. “CMS budget materials show that these user fees are collected to support marketplace operations and that authorized collections remain available until expended, but the White House and CMS have not publicly laid out the accounting mechanism for these checks,” Schultz added.
3. How meaningful is a one-time $500 payment compared with what ACA consumers are currently paying?
For a middle-income household buying unsubsidized coverage, health care professionals question how much of its annual premium or recent premium increase $500 would realistically offset.
“The average benchmark silver gross premium in 2026 runs about $625 a month, so roughly $7,500 a year for a 40-year-old,” Greg Marchand, a dual board-certified OBGYN and minimally invasive gynecologic surgeon in Mesa, Arizona, told Moneywise. “For a 60-year-old, the national average unsubsidized benchmark silver is closer to $15,900. That makes $500 about six weeks of coverage for a younger enrollee and about two weeks for an older one.”
Measured against the increase alone, it‘s worse, since unsubsidized benchmark premiums jumped about 26% for 2026, the largest one-year move in eight years. “This does not solve anybody’s premium problem, Marchand said.
Marchand disagrees with the “drop in the bucket” critics, saying a drop in the bucket is still in the bucket. “This is money that would otherwise have sat in a federal account indefinitely while the people who paid it got nothing,” he noted.
Marchand also stated that in his practice $500 is not a rounding error. “It’s the difference between a woman keeping her post-operative follow-up and canceling it, or filling the prescription instead of stretching it,” he added. “I have had patients delay a hysterectomy for a year over a deductible, and the disease does not politely wait.”
Must Read
- Jeff Bezos backs a platform that lets anyone invest in rental homes for as little as $100 — 6 ways to build wealth like a landlord without actually being one
- The tax breaks in Trump's 'big beautiful bill' expire after 2028. Here are 4 moves to make before the window closes
There’s a broader market implication for the $500 payment
Experts say the payout is a one-time measure unless the administration establishes a recurring rebate program.
“The more durable approach is to set a Marketplace user fee correctly in the first place,” Schultz said. “CMS has already reduced from 2.5% in 2026 to 1.9% in 2027. That could put some downward pressure on premiums, but it’s a relatively small lever compared with the underlying growth in healthcare costs.”
The broader issue is that the individual market is playing an expanding role in employer coverage. “CMS and the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) now use the name CHOICE Arrangements for ICHRAs, which allow employers to reimburse employees for individual coverage purchased through the healthcare marketplace or directly from an insurer,” Schultz said. “If a CHOICE offer is affordable, the employee generally can’t claim a Marketplace premium tax credit and often enrolls outside the exchange, where no user fee applies.”
Some CHOICE participants who enroll through HealthCare.gov could therefore fall within the announced no-premium-assistance population receiving rebates, “although the White House has not specifically addressed them,” Schultz added.
As far as winners and losers in the $500 payment picture, the clearest negative cohort is older middle- income people just above the 400% threshold, where KFF estimates a 60-year-old earning $65,000 now pays roughly $10,389 more per year.
“That is a real hit,” Marchand said. “The gain side, which gets almost no coverage, sits with taxpayers and with the long-run integrity of the market, because the enhanced structure capped what an enrollee paid at 8.5% of income no matter how high the gross premium climbed, and the U.S. Treasury covered the rest.”
When the government absorbs everything above a fixed share of income, nobody left in the chain has any reason to shop on price, and insurers have very little reason to fight for a lower rate.”
“That’s not a partisan observation; it’s just how incentives work,” Marchand added.
You May Also Like
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and 3 simple steps to fix it ASAP
- A single line on your car insurance policy could be inflating your premium by up to 30% — here's what to change
A former Wall Street bond trader, Brian O'Connell is the author of two best-selling books: “The 401k Millionaire” and “CNBC’s Creating Wealth.” His work is featured on national finance and business platforms like TheStreet.com, CBS News, CNN, The Wall Street Journal and Forbes.
