When you get married late in life, by definition you haven’t been building a life together. There’s nothing wrong with that, but it can create some pretty big challenges if one partner has been more successful than the other.
Let’s say, for example, that Tyra is 65 with $6 million saved. She’s retired and has the freedom and flexibility to travel, buy what she wants, and live in a nice home. The only problem is that Tyra’s new husband, Malcolm, doesn’t have nearly the resources that she does. Malcolm lives on Social Security and has a small amount saved, but he’s nowhere near Tyra’s league.
The couple has been married for a few years, and both are starting to become resentful. Malcolm can’t afford to do everything Tyra can, while Tyra feels like she’s being asked to fund his retirement after years of responsible saving.
Thanks for subscribing!
Retire on your terms — we'll show you how.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
The couple is at an impasse and wondering if the marriage can work and how to fix the situation. Fortunately, financial experts and therapists both weighed in on whether Tyra is being reasonable — and offered advice on what the couple should do.
Tyra isn’t wrong to want to keep her money separate
Tyra and Malcolm are in a challenging position, especially since a recent survey of older singles found that 97% listed financial incompatibility as a dating dealbreaker. However, the first thing Tyra needs to realize is that her feelings are valid.
“You’re not wrong to want to keep your finances separate, especially when you’re marrying late in life and coming into the marriage with very different levels of assets,” David Kon, founder of Wealthfluent, told Moneywise.
In fact, as Debra Feinberg, a couples therapist and founder of Maplewood Counseling, told Moneywise, keeping assets separate is “a choice plenty of couples who marry later in life make, especially when there are grown children, an estate, or a lot of life already lived.”
Tyra also has practical reasons to protect what she has built. As Steve Azoury, ChFC® and owner of Azoury Financial, advised Moneywise, “I would keep the accounts in only your name. This way, you can direct where the funds go when you pass away, add your own beneficiaries, and specify what split each beneficiary receives.”
However, while you can, and perhaps should, keep at least some assets separate, that doesn’t mean it will be easy.
“A $6 million net worth doesn’t automatically create an obligation to erase another adult’s financial circumstances,” said Brook McKenzie, a licensed counselor and CEO of Burning Tree Programs. “But marriage also becomes difficult when one person experiences money as ‘mine’ while expecting the other person to experience the relationship as ‘ours.’”
Must Read
- Jeff Bezos backs a platform that lets anyone invest in rental homes for as little as $100 — 6 ways to build wealth like a landlord without actually being one
- The tax breaks in Trump's 'big beautiful bill' expire after 2028. Here are 4 moves to make before the window closes
Decide what mine, yours, and ours is
While Tyra has every right to protect what she’s built, the couple still has a problem to overcome.
“After more than 25 years as a family law attorney, I don’t think the problem is wanting to keep your $6 million separate. The problem is getting married without making sure you both understand what ‘mine, yours and ours’ is going to mean,” Jenny Bradley, a board-certified family law specialist and the founder of Triangle Smart Divorce, told Moneywise.
As a married couple, their financial and daily life are shared. They need a practical plan for how they’ll handle the difference in their assets. “You need to talk about the practical side. Who pays for the house? Travel? Healthcare? Everyday expenses? What happens if one spouse needs long-term care? And what happens when one of you dies?” Bradley said.
Feinberg recommends that you “talk about values before numbers,” with each spouse sharing what money means to them. She also advised creating a “shared pot for the shared life,” while keeping the bulk of assets separate. That shared pot can pay for things you do together, and each spouse can contribute in proportion to their assets. It can make life better for both.
“Keeping assets separate is different from saying, ‘your expenses are entirely your problem,’” Scott Beaulier, economist and business school dean at the University of Wyoming, told Moneywise. Marriage creates a household, and if two people have different financial resources, insisting on a 50-50 split of every expense can produce some strange results.”
Beaulier explained that Tyra can afford to do much more than Malcolm, so unless she wants to adjust her lifestyle to what he can afford, she’ll simply have to accept that she’ll pay more for some things. Hopefully, she finds having Malcolm in her life and by her side worth the cost.
You May Also Like
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and 3 simple steps to fix it ASAP
- A single line on your car insurance policy could be inflating your premium by up to 30% — here's what to change
Christy Bieber is a US based personal finance and legal writer who has 15 years of experience. She has written for many publications including Forbes, Kilplinger, CNN, WSJ, Credit Karma, Insurify and more.
