Jun 19, 2026
Snap is making a big bet on the future of wearable technology.
At the Augmented World Expo 2026, Snapchat parent company Snap (NASDAQ:SNAP) unveiled Specs, a pair of augmented reality glasses that CEO and co-founder Evan Spiegel says represent more than a decade of development. The company describes them as a “wearable computer” designed to bring AI assistance, entertainment, navigation, work tools and shared digital experiences into the real world without requiring users to constantly look down at their phones.
Advertisement
The glasses aren’t cheap. Specs cost $2,195, require a $200 refundable deposit to reserve and are expected to begin shipping this fall in the U.S., U.K. and France. Buyers must complete a virtual fitting process before ordering, and the glasses are available in two sizes.
Unlike Meta’s Ray-Ban smart glasses, which focus largely on cameras and AI features, Snap’s device aims to deliver a full augmented reality experience. The glasses can display digital objects in a user’s field of vision, support multiplayer experiences, browse the web, run apps and connect users through a feature called EyeConnect, which launches shared experiences when two Specs users make eye contact.
But while Snap is pitching Specs as the next era of computing, much of the early reaction online has focused on something else entirely: how they look.
People may be more interested in mocking the glasses than buying them
The Verge’s coverage of the launch quickly filled with hundreds of comments, many questioning whether consumers actually want to wear a computer on their face.
One commenter joked that the glasses looked like “something The Onion cooked up.” Another compared them to “modern 3D glasses crossed with particularly ugly safety goggles.” Several focused on the thick frames and apparent weight, with one writing: “Look what they’re doing to his ear! It’s really showing how heavy they must be.”
Comments on X included, “You couldn’t pay me enough money to wear these in public,” “Me as an 8 year old putting on my grandpa’s glasses” and “Absolutely zero style.”
Not everyone hated the design. A handful of commenters on The Verge described the glasses as “moderately cool looking” or said they were excited to try them. But the overall tone was notably skeptical, with many arguing that even if the technology is impressive, the fashion tradeoff isn’t worth it.
Advertisement
Snap stock fell close to 10% on June 16, Specs’ unveiling day.
Moneywise reached out to Snap for comment but has not heard back as of publication time.
Must Read
- The ultra-rich use these 5 real estate strategies to build wealth while they sleep — you can start with just $100
- Here’s the average income of Americans by age in 2026. Are you keeping up or falling behind?
- Insurance companies profit most from drivers who auto-renew without shopping around. Comparing 100+ quotes takes 2 minutes and costs nothing
Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.
Industry faces a broader challenge
That skepticism reflects a challenge the smart-glasses industry has faced for years.
Over a decade ago, Google Glass became a cautionary tale for face-worn tech: Google stopped selling the consumer Explorer version in 2015 after backlash over privacy, design and the “Glasshole” stigma.
Apple’s $3,500 Vision Pro illustrates another challenge facing face-worn computers: convincing mainstream consumers they’re worth the cost. Reuters reported in 2024 that demand for the headset had slowed after an initial burst of enthusiasm, citing analysts who pointed to its high price tag.
Advertisement
Meta’s Ray-Ban glasses have had more momentum: EssilorLuxottica said it had sold more than 2 million Ray-Ban Meta units since September 2023, and Reuters reported the company planned to expand production capacity to 10 million units annually by the end of 2026.
One difference, however, may be that consumers seem most willing to wear technology when it blends into their lives rather than announcing itself. According to International Data Corporation (IDC), global wearable-device shipments reached 611.5 million units in 2025, while wrist-worn devices alone shipped 45.6 million units in the first quarter of 2025. Meanwhile, smart rings, a newer tech focused largely on health tracking, are gaining momentum, with shipments projected to have grown 49% in 2025.
A hefty cost and heavy weight
At $2,195, Specs cost more than six times as much as many Ray-Ban Meta models, which start at around $350. They are also 15 times the cost of Snap’s camera-only glasses that hit the market in 2016 and had a price tag of $130.
The glasses also weigh roughly 132 to 136 grams, nearly double the weight of some competing smart-glasses products. Critics argue that makes them difficult to wear for long periods and unlikely to replace a user’s everyday eyewear.
For now, Snap appears to be targeting early adopters rather than mainstream consumers. The company has openly framed Specs as the beginning of a longer journey toward a future where computers move from pockets to faces.
Whether that future arrives may depend less on what the glasses can do and more on whether people actually want to wear them. Right now, at least judging by much of the online reaction, consumers seem far more convinced that smart glasses are clever than they are that they look cool.
You May Also Like
- JP Morgan sees gold hitting $6,000/oz before 2027 — and a Gold IRA lets you hold the physical metal while deferring the tax bill. Get your free guide from Priority Gold
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and the simple steps to fix it ASAP
- Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
- Millionaires under 43 are reshaping investing — just 25% of their portfolios are in stocks. Here’s where their money is going
Clay Halton is an associate editor at Money.ca, covering a wide range of consumer-focused financial stories. He has over eight years of experience in digital publishing and has written and edited for outlets including PCMag and Investopedia.
