• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during an announcement to renovate Washington Dulles International Airport, in the Oval Office of the White House on July 29. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

'A portfolio approach': Trump admin announces new government stakes in 7 chip companies in exchange for equity

On July 29, the Department of Commerce announced it intended to provide $874 million in federal incentives to seven AI and advanced computing companies in exchange for equity.

This isn’t the first time the Trump administration announced a similar equity-connected deal. Last year, the government invested $8.9 billion in Intel. In May of this year, it invested a little over $2 billion in 9 quantum computing companies in what it called “a portfolio approach.”

Advertisement

“The CHIPS R&D Office is taking a portfolio approach to strengthen and accelerate US leadership across multiple quantum modalities at once,” said Bill Frauenhofer, executive director of semiconductor investment and innovation at the Department of Commerce, in the Department’s press release on the deal.

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

The government owning equity in private companies is unusual, to say the least. And experts say that the way the Trump administration is approaching equity could be easy to abuse.

“The federal government has powers no private shareholder possesses,” said Tad DeHaven, policy analyst at the Cato Institute, in an email to Moneywise. “A government that owns the players cannot be trusted to call the game fairly.”

Here’s what makes government ownership stakes such a big deal — and what it could mean for you.

The government has owned equity in companies before, but not like this

While it is unusual, the U.S. government holding equity in private companies has occurred before. But there’s one big difference in past ownership deals compared to these new ones.

“It hasn’t been normal for Washington to accumulate stakes in otherwise private companies as a routine economic policy tool,” DeHaven said. He says that several administrations — including the Carter, Bush, and Obama administrations — have accumulated stakes in companies during emergencies, such as during the Great Recession or after 9/11.

“Whatever one thinks of those interventions, they were justified as emergency stabilization measures and generally intended to be unwound,” DeHaven said. “The second Trump administration is doing something quite different.”

Each of these deals has been brokered at least partially through the CHIPS and Science Act, a Biden-era bill that allows the government to fund domestic semiconductor production. During the Biden administration, CHIPS deals did not involve the government receiving equity stake in the companies they funded.

In September 2025, the Department of Commerce announced a new funding path for CHIPS called the “Investment Fund Path.”

Advertisement

The CHIPS R&D Office decides which path a company qualifies for, and companies who are chosen for the investment fund path “may be required to issue to the Department equity, warrants, licenses to intellectual property, royalties or revenue sharing, or other such instruments to ensure a return on investment to the Government.”

Ensuring a return on investment makes the new path sound more like a money-making strategy than a push to promote domestic production and job growth. It also tracks with Trump’s previous calls for a sovereign wealth fund.

The White House Press Office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

What this chip company deal means for you

Howard Lutnick, U.S. Secretary of Commerce, says that the most recent CHIPS deal “will enhance our country’s domestic capabilities, create high-paying jobs and keep America at the forefront of our semiconductor industry” in the Department’s release.

But what other ways could these deals impact the average consumer?

In the short term, DeHaven says it could provide protection to the company in question, along with the employees and suppliers that work there. But ultimately, regular citizens aren’t the ones who get dividends when the company’s stock goes up — the government does.

Advertisement

“Any return goes to the government under the applicable budget rules, while taxpayers remain exposed to losses and possible follow-on bailouts,” DeHaven said.

The government could use the ROI they get from the deal to fund programs that help Americans. But historically, the Trump administration has been more focused on cutting these programs instead.

Indirectly, DeHaven says that deals like this could “weaken market discipline, steer private capital toward politically favored firms, and place competitors and startups at a disadvantage.”

He also warns that Trump setting this precedent could lead to future administrations following his lead.

“Once Washington normalizes owning private companies, the remaining fight is over which politicians get to use that power and for what purposes,” Dehaven said.

You May Also Like

Share this:
Kit Pulliam Freelance Writer

Kit Pulliam is a DC-based financial journalist with over five years of experience writing, editing, and fact-checking financial content.

more from Kit Pulliam

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.