Follow us on Google for more Moneywise news
Add us on GoogleThe race to dominate artificial intelligence is becoming one of the most expensive corporate contests in history.
Amazon, Microsoft, Google parent Alphabet and Meta are expected to spend about $600 billion on AI infrastructure in 2026, according to Reuters. The historic spending spree is squeezing cash flow and putting pressure on companies to prove that their investments in chips, servers and data centers will eventually pay off.
Oracle has made one of the biggest bets. The company has emerged as a major supplier of AI computing capacity after reportedly signing a $300 billion contract with OpenAI, but the data centers needed to fulfill that agreement have contributed to a cash crunch. Oracle subsequently pursued thousands of job cuts as it looked for ways to fund its expansion, Reuters reported in March.
Thanks for subscribing!
The money news that actually matters.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
By the end of its 2026 fiscal year, Oracle’s workforce had fallen by approximately 21,000 employees, or 13%, from 162,000 to 141,000. The reduction came as Oracle restructured its business, partly in response to the adoption of AI within its operations.
Now, Oracle’s weakened financial position could make it significantly more expensive to secure electricity for one of the data centers at the heart of its AI ambitions.
Wisconsin regulators want a $7 billion guarantee
Oracle is involved in a planned nearly one-gigawatt data center in Port Washington, Wisconsin, that is expected to help the company fulfill its OpenAI contract.
But the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin has declined to loosen financial safeguards designed to prevent residential electricity customers from bearing the costs if a massive data center fails or closes, according to the Financial Times.
Under We Energies’ “very large customer” tariff, data center operators with an S&P credit rating below A- must provide collateral covering the power plants and transmission infrastructure constructed to serve them.
Oracle was rated BBB, two notches below the threshold, when the requirements were considered. S&P subsequently downgraded the company to BBB-, leaving it one notch above junk status. The ratings agency cited Oracle’s heavy AI spending and uncertain path toward generating enough profits from those investments.
As a result, Oracle could be required to provide more than $7 billion in cash or a letter of credit before the facility receives power. Maintaining that guarantee could cost the company more than $100 million annually.
Oracle has challenged the requirement in court, arguing that the added financing costs could discourage future investment in Wisconsin. The company said it remains committed to the approximately $15 billion project and would provide guarantees ensuring Wisconsin ratepayers are not exposed to its financial risks.
Regulators have held firm, stating that existing customers should not subsidize data centers “now or in the future.”
The concern extends well beyond Wisconsin. At least 24 states have approved large-load tariffs containing special pricing, minimum contract terms, exit fees or collateral requirements for data centers and other major electricity users.
Must Read
- The ultra-rich use these 5 real estate strategies to build wealth while they sleep — you can start with just $100
- Here’s the average income of Americans by age in 2026. Are you keeping up or falling behind?
- Insurance companies profit most from drivers who auto-renew without shopping around. Comparing 100+ quotes takes 2 minutes and costs nothing
Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.
AI spending is forcing difficult tradeoffs elsewhere
Oracle is not the only company finding that AI costs can quickly overwhelm budgets.
Uber exhausted its planned 2026 AI coding budget within four months as thousands of engineers adopted tools such as Claude Code. One two-hour session reportedly generated a bill of approximately $1,200, while some heavy users consumed between $500 and $2,000 per month.
Microsoft has also cut jobs while investing heavily in AI infrastructure. In July 2025, the company announced plans to eliminate approximately 9,000 positions, or nearly 4% of its workforce, after committing $80 billion in capital spending for that fiscal year. Reuters reported that the cost of expanding Microsoft’s AI infrastructure was weighing on its cloud margins.
Microsoft announced another 4,800 job cuts in July 2026 as companies continued shifting resources toward AI infrastructure.
Amazon and Meta have similarly announced thousands of job cuts while pouring money into AI. Reuters noted that layoffs and even employee buyouts have become part of the financial tradeoff as technology companies try to fund the industry’s unprecedented infrastructure buildout.
Oracle’s dispute in Wisconsin shows that cutting payroll and raising money may not be enough. As data centers consume more power and require billions of dollars in new electrical infrastructure, companies must also convince utilities and regulators that their AI bets are financially sound.
You May Also Like
- JP Morgan sees gold hitting $6,000/oz before 2027 — and a Gold IRA lets you hold the physical metal while deferring the tax bill. Get your free guide from Priority Gold
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and the simple steps to fix it ASAP
- Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
- Millionaires under 43 are reshaping investing — just 25% of their portfolios are in stocks. Here’s where their money is going
Clay Halton is an associate editor at Money.ca, covering a wide range of consumer-focused financial stories. He has over eight years of experience in digital publishing and has written and edited for outlets including PCMag and Investopedia.
