• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg leaves the Federal Courthouse in downtown Los Angeles after defending the company in a landmark social media addiction trial. Jon Putman/Anadolu via Getty Images

Meta was just slapped with a $942-million bill for harming kids — it makes that back in roughly five days

Emergency rooms in New Mexico are so crowded with children in psychiatric crisis that some kids sleep in hallways, waiting for a bed to open.

That’s how Dr. Kimothi Cain, a child psychiatrist at the University of New Mexico, described it under oath: “They sleep in the hallways with no privacy until a psychiatric bed can open so we can keep these children safe.”

Advertisement

On Aug. 6, Judge Bryan Biedscheid ruled that Meta helped cause that crisis. His order requires the company to pay $567 million into an abatement fund, on top of the $375 million a jury awarded New Mexico in March, bringing the state’s total to $942 million — the first judgment of its kind against Meta to come out of a full trial. Meta’s latest earnings show the company earns that much profit in roughly five days.

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

How the $942 million breaks down

A jury that heard evidence from Feb. 2 through March 24 found Meta committed 75,000 violations of New Mexico’s Unfair Practices Act. At the maximum $5,000 per violation, that came to $375 million. Biedscheid then held a bench trial in May, ruled that Instagram and Facebook amount to a public nuisance under state law and ordered the $567 million fund. Of that, $420 million goes to mental health treatment for kids in the state.

Much of the evidence came from Meta’s own files. According to the court’s findings, a 2019 internal test found that “26% of the people we recommend to Groomers were Teens.” In a 2020 internal chat, an employee wrote that the People You May Know feature “was responsible for 80% of violating adult/minor connections.”

Arturo Bejar, who ran Meta’s Protect and Care engineering team for six years, told the jury: “the product is very good at connecting people with interests, and if your interest is little girls, it will be really good at connecting you with little girls.”

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

Why the judgment barely dents Meta’s finances

Meta reported second-quarter earnings on July 29, eight days before the ruling. Revenue came in at $60.8 billion, and the quarter produced roughly $15.8 billion in net income — about $174 million in profit every day for 91 days. At that rate, the company covers the full New Mexico judgment in about 5.4 days. Put another way, the biggest child safety judgment Meta has ever faced at trial costs it less than 6% of one quarter’s profit.

Meta had already set money aside for outcomes like this. The company booked $2.4 billion in legal charges in the quarter, more than twice the New Mexico total, and told investors that several more youth-related trials scheduled this year could bring material losses. Also, the market read Thursday’s ruling accordingly, as Meta shares slipped less than half a percent in after-hours trading.

Biedscheid acknowledged the limits of what one state court could do to a company this size. He cut the state’s proposed 15-year abatement plan to five years and reduced the total because, in the court’s assessment, other platforms including Snapchat, TikTok and YouTube also contributed to the same harms.

What the order changes for teen accounts in New Mexico

If your teenager is on Instagram in New Mexico, the order changes a few concrete things.

Advertisement

Their account stays private by default, and switching that off now requires a parent’s consent. Meta can’t recommend their account to any adult they don’t know, and unconnected adults can’t message them at all. Adults caught in child sexual exploitation face what the order calls a “1-strike policy”: every account disabled and new ones blocked. And minors are barred from “romantic or sexualized interactions” with Meta’s AI chatbots.

Biedscheid stopped short of touching the features his own findings link to compulsive use. He left infinite scroll, autoplay and the recommendation algorithm in place, writing that rules for a whole industry have to come from lawmakers or regulators rather than a case against one company.

Meta isn’t accepting any of it yet. “We disagree with the ruling and will appeal,” the company said Thursday, adding that it works hard to keep people safe and remains confident in its record of protecting teens online. The five-year compliance clock pauses while an appeal is pending, as long as Meta posts a bond. So while kids in Albuquerque wait for hallway beds to open up, the company earning $174 million a day has every incentive to take the long way through the courts.

Meta had not responded to Moneywise’s request for comment (beyond its public statement) by the time of publication. The New Mexico Department of Justice could not be reached for comment beyond Attorney General Torrez’s public statement; in it, he called the ruling “a victory for every parent who has worried about what social media is doing to their child and every child who deserves to grow up safer online.”

You May Also Like

Share this:

Godwin Oluponmile is a content specialist, SEO strategist and copywriter with seven years of expertise in finance, Web 3.0, B2B SaaS and technology. His work has been featured in publications such as Entrepreneur, HackerNoon, Blocktelegraph and Benzinga.

more from Godwin Oluponmile

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.