SPY -0.12%
BND +0.01%
QQQ -0.75%
DIA -0.17%
VNQ -0.65%
GLD -0.85%
BTC -0.84%
AAPL +0.16%
GOOGL -10.47%
NVDA -2.00%
MSFT +1.59%
META -0.44%
AMZN -1.65%
TSLA -1.21%
UBER -0.29%
GS +2.73%
BAC +1.81%
JPM +2.40%
BRK.A +0.23%
COST +0.72%
XOM +2.37%
BABA -1.17%
WMT +1.59%
SPCX -4.02%
DIS +0.19%
F +0.43%
  • Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
Left: Twitch streamer Hasan Piker Right: Political commentator Scott Jennings. Left: Sam Barnes/Web Summit via Sportsfile via Getty Images Right: Paul Morigi/Getty Images Courtesy of the Rainey Center

Left-wing streamer Hasan Piker sues conservative CNN contributor Scott Jennings for $72.5M over ‘manipulated’ video

Conservative pundit and CNN contributor Scott Jennings is facing a defamation lawsuit that could cost him $72.5 million if the jury rules against him.

Twitch streamer Hasan Piker filed the action on Oct. 27 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, alleging Jennings told the audience on his podcast that Piker had called for Black voters to be lynched and had a “plan of returning our country to lynchings.”

Advertisement

“All of Mr. Jennings’ accusations are false,” the suit says. “Mr. Piker has never advocated the lynching of Black Americans, or anyone else. He has never called for a return to lynchings. And he has never proposed anything remotely resembling the supposed plan that Mr. Jennings falsely attributed to him.”

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Jennings did not immediately reply to Moneywise’s request for comment about the lawsuit.

A contentious clip

Piker, known online as HasanAbi, is an American left-wing political commentator and Twitch streamer. In the lawsuit, he claims Jennings aired a manipulated video on the Aug. 11 episode of his podcast, which misrepresented his comments.

The comments, Piker says in the filing, came from an Oct. 29 2024 Twitch stream, where he mocked a Black conservative political commentator who blamed “woke DAs” for policies harming Black Americans. According to the suit, Piker sarcastically caricatured the commentator’s argument, asking, “Can we go back to a better time when lynchings were happening?”

The suit alleges the comments Jennings played were “cropped, shortened, and rearranged” and failed to identify the person Piker said he was mocking. According to the suit, Jennings did not personally create the video. It was first posted on X by the National Republican Senatorial Committee on Aug. 6, 2026.

But the suit alleges Jennings presented the manipulated comments as authentic, then added a caption reading “Piker: ‘Let’s go back to a better time when lynchings were happening.’”

“These were not expressions of disagreement with Mr. Piker’s politics. Nor were they rhetorical characterizations of an admittedly controversial commentator,” the lawsuit reads. “They were factual assertions about what Mr. Piker had said and advocated in his work. Each statement was demonstrably false.”

Piker is seeking at least $27.5 million in compensatory damages and $45 million in punitive damages.

Advertisement

Social media feud

The video at the center of the lawsuit was just one of a series of comments Jennings made about Piker in August. On Aug. 14, he aired a series of other clips claiming Piker had “expressed sympathy for violent extremists.” Just one day later he called Piker a “simpering, whining, play acting socialist.”

Neither of those clips is mentioned in the lawsuit.

The two commentators have enormous followings. Piker has over 3.1 million Twitch followers, 2 million subscribers on YouTube and 1.9 million Instagram followers. Jennings has over 970,000 followers on X and 486,000 on Instagram, but The Scott Jennings Show airs on more than 200 radio stations around the country in addition to the podcast audience.

“Mr. Jennings continues to falsely portray Mr. Piker as a violent racist who advocates the lynching of Black people. And Mr. Jennings continues to damage Mr. Piker’s reputation and his livelihood,” the lawsuit reads. “The First Amendment protects robust political disagreement, including speech that is harsh, sarcastic, provocative, and offensive. It does not give a publisher license to lie. This action concerns that distinction.”

You May Also Like

Share this:
Chris Morris Contributing Writer

Chris Morris is a US based veteran journalist with more than 35 years of experience at many of the biggest digital news outlets. In addition to his activities as a writer, reporter and editor, Chris is also a frequent moderator and speaker at major conferences, including CES and South by Southwest.

more from Chris Morris

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.