SPY -2.15%
BND +0.53%
QQQ -4.54%
DIA -1.44%
VNQ +2.34%
GLD -4.75%
BTC -5.86%
AAPL +0.37%
GOOGL -13.37%
NVDA -4.70%
MSFT -1.51%
META +0.30%
AMZN -5.42%
TSLA -0.99%
UBER +0.09%
GS -3.32%
BAC -1.57%
JPM -0.52%
BRK.A +0.45%
COST +2.87%
XOM +2.74%
BABA -2.94%
WMT +3.98%
SPCX -6.32%
DIS +1.98%
F +2.34%
  • Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
Two-panel image of Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier (left) and cars driving through flooded streets (right). Joe Raedle and NurPhoto/Getty Images

Florida sues the company behind flood scores on home listings, citing a house rated ‘10/10 Extreme’ next to two 1/10s

Advertisement

The ratings are also provided to consumers through companies like Zillow.

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Uthmeier alleges that the First Street Technology has broken the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act by misrepresenting Flood risk numbers as accurate to Florida residents.

Here’s what’s behind those claims.

Higher climate numbers means higher insurance rates and less home sales

In the lawsuit, Uthmeier says that First Street’s flood risk ratings routinely deviate from trusted, government-made FEMA flood maps.

The lawsuit cites a study that says First Street models agree with FEMA models around 55% of the time, on average, but only around 23% to 24% in areas with medium and high urbanization.

“First Street rates certain properties as major flood risk, but FEMA rates the same properties as minimal flood hazard, the lowest federal certification,” said James Uthmeier in an X post on Oct. 23.

The lawsuit also cites a Better Business Bureau complaint where the customer said their house was given a 10/10 flood rating indicating extreme risk, while their next-door neighbors were both given a 1/10 rating.

The lawsuit alleges that First Street’s models are faulty, and that they exaggerate the risk that homeowners or prospective home buyers face. This matters because homes with high climate risk ratings tend to sell less often and for lower amounts of money. If underwriters are basing risk on exaggerated numbers, then the insurance they provide will have a higher cost.

“Florida homeowners deserve facts, not alarmist scores that hit their property values and their wallets,” Uthmeier said.

Advertisement

Must Read

The Florida AG’s campaign against climate-focused organizations

Inflated rating risks have real consequences for consumers. But Uthmeier’s lawsuit isn’t just about the accuracy of the numbers.

The Florida Attorney General has been focused on climate-focused companies for some time. In 2025, he launched an investigation into a “climate cartel,” issuing subpoenas to the CDP and the Science Based Targets Initiative — two charities that help companies take action against climate change.

“Radical climate activists have hijacked corporate governance and weaponized it against the free market,” said Uthmeier in a press release. “Florida will not sit back while international pressure groups shake down American companies to fund their ESG grift.”

This year, he accused two other companies of being part of the “climate cartel” in a separate investigation into the Environmental Law Institute and the Climate Judiciary Project. He also led a group of six Attorneys General in a warning against the “ringleader of the ‘climate cartel,’” Ceres.

Advertisement

Uthmeier uses similar charged language in the First Street lawsuit, although he never referred to them as being part of the “climate cartel.” He says that Florida sellers are “stuck with perfectly good homes tainted with First Street’s climate chicanery,” and says that First Street intends to “fear monger in the name of climate advocacy.”

“First Street is marketing fear to advance a climate activism agenda while exploiting the same fear to line their pockets,” said Uthmeier in the lawsuit.

On its website, First Street Technology says its mission is “connecting climate and financial risk,” adding, “It’s not too late. With the right data, we can identify the problems, avoid bad investments, and implement solutions.”

“Most underwriting for real assets still uses historical data, but the climate is no longer behaving the way the historical record would predict,” wrote First Street founder Matthew Eby. “As heat, drought, and water stress increase, outdated models simply don’t offer a complete view of risk anymore.”

First Street Technology and Attorney General James Uthmeier did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

You May Also Like

Share this:
Kit Pulliam Freelance Writer

Kit Pulliam is a DC-based financial journalist with over five years of experience writing, editing and fact-checking financial content.

more from Kit Pulliam

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.