• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
Freshly harvested nectarines in totes in the orchard with field workers in the background near Dinuba, California. Steve Goossen / Design Pics Editorial / Universal Images Group via Getty Images)

‘I should be picking them right now, but I’m not’: California farmer was banned from selling 125,000 lbs of nectarines — so he gave them away instead

A California farmer gave away about 125,000 pounds of ripe nectarines, drawing such large crowds that the free fruit giveaway had to be temporarily shut down over safety concerns.

Cesar Mora, who says he was blocked from selling his crop, is a third-generation farmer in Reedley. He said he decided to give away the fruit after an ongoing legal dispute left him unable to bring his white nectarines to market for a second consecutive season. Rather than watch the fruit go to waste, he invited the public to pick it for free.

Advertisement

“I should be picking them right now, but I’m not all due to a giant ag corporation that has been preventing me from doing anything with this crop,” he said in a video posted to his Facebook page.

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

At the center of the dispute is a years-old contract with one of California’s largest fruit marketers. Mora alleges the company falsely claimed it had exclusive rights to the nectarine variety he grows, while the company says he violated a valid agreement by selling the fruit elsewhere. The lawsuit remains ongoing.

Why couldn’t he sell his own nectarines?

Mora signed a 2017 agreement to grow and sell the Monalise white nectarine variety through Giumarra Brothers Fruit Co., which says it holds rights to the variety through a sublicense from French company Star Fruits Diffusion.

Under the agreement, Mora was required to sell the fruit only through Giumarra. But he now alleges the company misrepresented its rights to the variety and has not provided the licensing documentation he says would prove its claims.

After Mora ended the relationship in 2023 and sold to another packer, Giumarra sued him for breach of contract. Mora countersued, accusing the company of unfair practices and arguing that he was misled.

A judge has ruled that the agreement remains valid regardless of the patent status, according to the Associated Press.

Giumarra’s attorneys told KSEE/KGPE that the company remains committed to “honoring our contractual obligations” and “safeguarding the proprietary programs” that support its grower partners.

Mora has said the fight has put his future in farming at risk. Instead of letting the crop fall to the ground, he launched a giveaway under the name “No Nectarines Wasted.”

Advertisement

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

Legal fights aren’t the only reason farmers struggle

Mora’s case centers on a contract dispute over a proprietary fruit variety. But it highlights a broader systemic problem facing some California growers: Farmers can produce healthy, edible crops and still find themselves without a viable path to market.

Moneywise recently reported on California farmer Sarb Johl, who prepared to rip up 9-year-old peach trees worth an estimated $12,500 per acre after Del Monte Foods’ bankruptcy left growers without enough processing capacity.

That collapse left peach farmers facing long-term contracts and a sharply reduced buyer pool, with only about 24,000 tons of the 74,000 tons previously delivered expected to find a home.

The fallout was serious enough that the USDA approved up to $9 million for a clingstone peach tree removal program after California lawmakers requested federal help.

Mora’s dispute involves intellectual property and contract law, while the peach growers were hit by the loss of a major processor. Both situations show how farmers can invest years into producing a crop only to find that the final hurdle is not growing the fruit — it’s finding a legal and financially viable way to sell it.

You May Also Like

Share this:
Clay Halton Associate Editor

Clay Halton is an associate editor at Money.ca, covering a wide range of consumer-focused financial stories. He has over eight years of experience in digital publishing and has written and edited for outlets including PCMag and Investopedia.

more from Clay Halton

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.