• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
Steve and Karen Blume chat with local media outlet KCAL News. A picture of one of their goats is also shown. Screenshot/KCAL News

A family raised their fence to stop coyotes from killing their goats — now they’re facing a lawsuit from their unsympathetic HOA

After seven of their goats fell victim to coyote killings, Steve and Karen Blume thought they had come up with a solution: Build a taller fence.

Instead of bringing the family peace of mind, however, the new fence has sparked an expensive legal battle with their homeowners association (HOA), which claims that the structure violates neighborhood rules and should be removed.

Advertisement

The dispute highlights a costly reality for millions of homeowners living in HOA-governed communities. Even well-intentioned home improvements can trigger lawsuits, legal bills and expensive compliance orders.

Read the best of Moneywise in 5 minutes or less.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

According to KCAL News, the Orange County family initially had a standard six-foot fence around their property in Laguna Hills. But after coyotes repeatedly jumped the barrier and killed seven of their blue maize goats, Steve began experimenting with ways to keep them out.

“The coyotes were just jumping over the fence and killing my goats,” he told KCAL. “It’s a horrible thing to go out there and see our goats ripped apart.”

He first added mesh to raise the fence to about eight feet before incorporating blinking lights. When both of those measures failed, he installed a 45-degree angled extension, bringing the effective height to roughly nine feet. He says that finally stopped the fatal attacks.

The HOA says rules still apply

The fence may have protected the family’s animals, but it also caught the attention of their HOA.

The association has filed a lawsuit seeking to force the family to bring the fence back into compliance with the community’s six-foot height limit. According to the HOA, it spent nearly a year attempting to negotiate with the homeowners before filing the suit, saying that the family declined mediation and refused to modify the structure.

The Blumes have acknowledged that they did not receive approval before making the amendments to their fence, but they argue that they were responding to an emergency. They also contend that California law requires pet owners to responsibly protect their animals.

On January 1, 2026, California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed six bills into law — supported by the Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF) — to help protect the well-being of animals in the state. Those laws are largely tied to the sale of pets, but some are structured to keep pets safe.

The new FOUND Act (AB 478), for example, ensures that companion animals are protected during emergencies and that local governments implement clear procedures to support pet owners during those emergencies. And, the pre-existing Humane Care and Anti-Cruelty law, under California Penal Code Section 597, prohibits animal abuse, including torturing, wounding or killing a living animal.

Advertisement

Karen questioned why nearby tennis courts can legally stretch to heights of up to 15 feet to keep the balls from flying over the fence, but their fence extension — designed to save living animals — is prohibited. The family also has also claimed that the alternatives proposed by the HOA would cost them thousands of dollars while offering less protection against the predators.

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

HOA disputes can become costly quickly

Coyote concerns have become increasingly common in suburban communities across California, where a combination of development expansion and wildfire-wrecked habitats have brought homeowners and wildlife into closer contact. Research shows that over the last decade California coyote occurrences have increased with “both proximity and intensity of urbanization.”

It’s also worth noting that in California, in particular, the Wildlife Resources Committee (WRC) issued an important recommendation in 2025 to remove coyotes from the state’s list of non-game animals. Previously, the classification made coyotes one of the only wildlife species in the state that anyone could kill — “in any number, at any time, for any reason,” according to Project Coyote.

“Killing coyotes indiscriminately doesn’t reduce conflict, it fuels it,” the organization wrote in its 2025 Impact Report, making a case for a regulatory framework that treats coyotes as “ecologically vital animals.” Coyotes help keep smaller predators like skunks, racoons and foxes in check and provide natural pest and disease control.

Advertisement

Although coyotes have been responsible for attacking both people and pets, animal rights groups have advocated for peaceful protection practices to help communities live in harmony with coyotes rather than claiming more lives — their lives.

That’s largely why many homeowners have simply invested in taller fencing and other deterrents like motion-activated lighting and coyote rollers — long, extruded aluminum tubes that sit atop fences and spin when animals attempt to hop over.

But not all those deterrents are compliant and, for homeowners with HOAs, disputes can become financial issues long before they even reach a courtroom. Legal defense costs can climb quickly depending on how long a case drags on. And, even if a homeowner ultimately reaches a settlement, they may still be responsible for attorney fees, mediation expenses or the cost of bringing their property back into compliance.

For families living in HOA-governed homes, balancing safety with neighborhood restrictions isn’t always straightforward.

As the Blumes’ case moves through the courts, the outcome could determine whether protecting pets from wildlife justifies breaking architectural rules — or whether homeowners must continue following HOA regulations even when they believe that those rules put their pets at risk.

You May Also Like

Share this:
AnnaMarie Houlis Weekend Editor

AnnaMarie is a weekend editor for Moneywise.

more from AnnaMarie Houlis

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.

Sign up free.

Join 250,000+ readers by activating your free account. Get our newsletter, a Warren Buffett investing guide, and commenting access on stories.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Already signed up?