For years, Tesla treated a ponytailed, Russian-born tinkerer in Nashville as an asset. The man, known online only by the handle GreenTheOnly — "Green," to those who work with him — had been cracking open Tesla's computers since buying his first Model X in 2017, feeding the flaws he found back to the company through its bug bounty program. According to Business Insider, which published a deep investigation into his role on July 1, a member of Tesla's security team offered him $15,000 for each software vulnerability he resolved.
Then Green turned that same skill against the company. Working from a forensic copy of a crashed Model S's Autopilot computer, he recovered the "collision snapshot" Tesla had long insisted it didn't have — data that helped land Elon Musk’s car company with a $243 million verdict, the largest ever handed down against it and the first time a jury found Tesla liable in a wrongful-death case tied directly to its Autopilot system.
Tesla's public bug bounty program, run through the platform Bugcrowd, has advertised rewards from hundreds to tens of thousands of dollars per qualifying finding. This kind of "white hat" arrangement is common across Silicon Valley, where tech companies pay independent researchers to find holes before criminals do. Green, by his own account, stumbled into Tesla's systems while investigating whether the company was using open-source code without publishing it, and his curiosity only deepened from there.
Thanks for subscribing!
The money news that actually matters.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
Benavides v. Tesla
The crash at the center of the case happened just after 9 p.m. on April 25, 2019, on a dark, two-lane stretch near Key Largo, Florida. George McGee, driving a 2019 Model S with Autopilot engaged, dropped his phone and bent to retrieve it. The car blew through a stop sign and a flashing red light at roughly 62 mph and slammed into a parked Chevrolet Tahoe. Naibel Benavides Leon, 22, was standing beside the SUV with her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. She was killed, while he was critically injured.
To prove their case, Angulo and Leon’s family needed the Autopilot computer's record of what the car's cameras had seen in the final seconds — a package of crash data that Tesla vehicles automatically transmit to company servers after a collision. Tesla said it never had the full file. A service-center technician who plugged in the computer years earlier had pronounced the data corrupted. That story held up until the plaintiffs recovered the original hardware from the Florida Highway Patrol in 2024 and brought in Green, who had built a following for recovering data from wrecked Teslas and posting his findings — the same work that once made him useful to Tesla.
Green warned the legal team not to simply power the units on, as Tesla had suggested. Doing that near an internet connection, he said, was "exactly the advice I would give" if the goal were to destroy evidence, since Tesla's standard practice marked local crash data for deletion after uploading it. Instead, he worked from a forensic clone.
Must Read
- Jeff Bezos backs a platform that lets anyone invest in rental homes for as little as $100 — 6 ways to build wealth like a landlord without actually being one
- The tax breaks in Trump's 'big beautiful bill' expire after 2028. Here are 4 moves to make before the window closes
A ThinkPad and a Starbucks hot chocolate
In October 2024, the plaintiffs' attorneys flew Green to Miami and sat with him inside a Starbucks near the airport. He fired up his ThinkPad laptop, plugged in a flash drive holding the forensic copy, and — over a Venti-size hot chocolate — found the missing data within minutes. It included the collision snapshot and confirmation that Tesla had received the file within moments of the crash. The attorneys high-fived behind him, according to The Washington Post.
"For any reasonable person, it was obvious the data was there," Green told WaPo, who spoke to the pub anonymously out of fear of retribution.
Green did not testify at the trial. But the augmented video he built from the recovered data — which showed the system detecting the parked truck, the stop sign, and a glimpse of the two people standing behind it, then doing nothing to stop — became a centerpiece of the plaintiffs' presentation.
On August 1, 2025, a Miami federal jury found Tesla placed the Model S on the market with a defect that was a legal cause of the harm. It assigned Tesla 33% of the fault and awarded $243 million — $19.5 million to the Benavides family, $23.1 million to Angulo, and $200 million in punitive damages. Tesla had rejected a $60 million settlement offer before trial. In February 2026, a federal judge refused to throw out the verdict, writing that the evidence "more than supports" it. Tesla is appealing at the Eleventh Circuit.
Tesla has disputed the claim that the company hid anything. Its attorney told jurors the company's handling of the data had been "clumsy" rather than deliberate, saying, "We didn't think we had it, and we found out we did." In its post-verdict statement, the company called the outcome "wrong" and insisted no car in 2019 or today could have prevented the crash, describing the case as "a fiction concocted by plaintiffs' lawyers blaming the car." Tesla did not immediately respond to Moneywise’s request for comment.
Green's work has fed a wave of similar suits, even as Musk builds out his empire — SpaceX went public in June in the largest IPO on record, raising $75 billion, and Tesla continues expanding its camera-only robotaxi fleet. But Green says Tesla has wisened up and made it significantly more difficult to access vehicle data. He told WaPo: "If an accident happened today like this, I won't be able to extract the data."
You May Also Like
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and 3 simple steps to fix it ASAP
- A single line on your car insurance policy could be inflating your premium by up to 30% — here's what to change
Dave Smith is the VP of Content at Wise Publishing and Editor-in-Chief at Moneywise and Money.ca. His work has also been published in Fortune, Business Insider, Newsweek, ABC News, and USA Today.
