The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that charges have been laid against 12 individuals in San Diego County alleged to have operated “bogus” day cares.
Prosecutors say those charged fraudulently collected more than $10 million in federal funds meant for child care for low-income families.
“These fraudsters may have criminally gamed the system before. But today, the game is over,” U.S. Attorney Adam Gordon for the Southern District of California said in a DOJ news release.
Thanks for subscribing!
The money news that actually matters.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
According to the DOJ, although the 12 cases were unrelated, the alleged fraud “was essentially the same,” the release says.
Assistant U.S. Attorney General Colin McDonald told the San Diego Union-Tribune in an interview that fraud schemes can be explained through word of mouth and passed along, but such actions may not meet the legal parameters of conspiracy.
Licensed operators
The individuals were each licensed by the state to operate a home child care facility, the DOJ says, as well as registered with the Child Development Associates (CDA) and the YMCA “to provide subsidized child care to eligible families.”
Federal funding for child care for low-income families is distributed to the state by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. In San Diego County, Child Development Associates (CDA) and the YMCA, as well as the county, administer the funding.
The DOJ release alleges that the individuals “knowingly submitted false attendance records claiming they provided child care on dates and at times when they did not.”
Child care providers submit their monthly attendance records to the YMCA or CDA and are paid directly.
“CDA and the YMCA relied on those fraudulent records and issued payments with federal funds intended to pay for child care actually provided to low-income families,” the DOJ says.
The DOJ release noted that the attendance records “must be signed by both the provider and parent under penalty of perjury and include the dates and times children are in care.”
The Union-Tribune reported that, at a news conference announcing the charges, prosecutors did not address whether the falsified attendance records contained parent signatures.
Must Read
- Jeff Bezos backs a platform that lets anyone invest in rental homes for as little as $100 — 6 ways to build wealth like a landlord without actually being one
- The tax breaks in Trump's 'big beautiful bill' expire after 2028. Here are 4 moves to make before the window closes
Investigation involved surveillance
The DOJ release says that surveillance recordings of the individuals’ home child care facilities did not align with the attendance records that they submitted.
“Criminal complaints in several of the cases detailed how federal agents from the IRS and Homeland Security Investigations set up stationary, motion-activated surveillance cameras earlier this year to watch the homes of the defendants for weeks at a time,” the Tribune-Journal reported.
The DOJ release describes one defendant who allegedly “submitted attendance records claiming to have provided child care to 23 children in March 2026 and 25 children April 2026, and that he provided child care every day of those two months.” But surveillance of the home for 57 days in that time period, the DOJ says, only shows children entering or exiting the facility on one day, “coincidentally, the day a state inspector showed up for an unannounced inspection,” the release says.
Another individual is alleged to have submitted attendance records and collected payments for a time period that they were not located in the U.S., according to border crossing records, the DOJ says.
Each of the 12 individuals is alleged to have received amounts between $538,000 and $1.2 million “during various time periods that range from months to years,” the DOJ says.
The individuals are each facing charges of wire fraud, which has a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison and a $500,000 fine; some individuals face a money laundering charge too, which also has a maximum penalty of 20 years and a $500,000 fine.
You May Also Like
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and 3 simple steps to fix it ASAP
- A single line on your car insurance policy could be inflating your premium by up to 30% — here's what to change
Rebecca Payne has more than a decade of experience editing and producing both local and national daily newspapers. She's worked on the Toronto Star, the Globe and Mail, Metro, Canada's National Observer, the Virginian-Pilot and Daily Press.
