Follow us on Google for more Moneywise news
Add us on GoogleSince President Trump cut over $186 billion from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) through the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, over 80,000 Alabamians have lost access to benefits. Meanwhile, Feeding America finds that one in six Alabamians, or 919,160 people, are facing hunger, 30% of whom are children.
Already spread thin as a result of rising inflation, local food banks have borne the brunt of rising food insecurity in the absence of federal aid. However, Alabama is facing a potential $174 million fee for its SNAP payment error rate, due on October 1, 2027. Failure to pay this fee could result in more people losing benefits — and more people going hungry — as food banks are unable to keep up with demand.
On the morning of August 19, a group of food bank leaders in Alabama gathered for a press conference urging Alabama’s senators Katie Britt and Tommy Tuberville to advocate for a payment delay.
Thanks for subscribing!
The money news that actually matters.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
“We are a critical safety net, but we were never built to replace the federal nutrition support that lets families buy groceries consistently and with dignity,” Nicole Williams, CEO of the Community Food Bank of Central Alabama, said in the press conference.
SNAP payment error fees could cost states $9 billion
Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act penalizes states with SNAP payment error rates greater than 6%, ranging from 5% to 15% of SNAP costs depending on how far a state’s error rate exceeds this threshold.
States with error rates between 6% and 7.99% must pay 5% of SNAP costs. States with an error rate between 8% and 9.99% would pay 10%. States with error rates greater than 10% have to pay 15%.
Currently, most states have error rates greater than 6%, adding up to roughly $9 billion in overall costs. Alabama, with an error rate of 9.52% in the fiscal year 2025, would be responsible for 10% of SNAP costs in the state, or about $174 million.
State cost-sharing starts on October 1, 2027, the beginning of FY2028. However, states with an error rate of 13.3% or higher get a two-year buffer period, so the states that exceed that threshold — Alaska, Delaware, Georgia, Illinois, New Mexico, and Oregon, as well as the District of Columbia — won’t have to pay any fees until FY2029.
Alabama food bank leaders are asking for the same two-year buffer given to the states with high error rates.
“If we had a two year delay like they gave many other states, it would give us the ability to get under that 6% and save our communities in our state from paying into those funds and keep people on the rolls,” Williams said in the conference
Must Read
- The ultra-rich use these 5 real estate strategies to build wealth while they sleep — you can start with just $100
- Here’s the average income of Americans by age in 2026. Are you keeping up or falling behind?
- Insurance companies profit most from drivers who auto-renew without shopping around. Comparing 100+ quotes takes 2 minutes and costs nothing
Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.
Leaders want more time before new federal fees take effect
Alabama is far from the only state requesting this buffer. A bipartisan group of 210 mayors sent a letter to Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Sen. John Boozman and Ranking Member Sen. Amy Klobuchar. The letter urges that they reject cuts to SNAP and delay the cost shift to allow states more time to improve error rates.
SNAP payment errors are inaccurately distributed payments to recipients, whether they received too much assistance or not enough. According to Kyle Waide, CEO of the Atlanta Community Food Bank, these issues are often a result of clerical errors — mistakes in data entry or keystroke errors.
“Some are trying to characterize these error rates as examples of fraud or abuse, and I think that is a mischaracterization,” Waide told Moneywise. “Nobody’s arguing for the idea that accuracy doesn’t matter, but the mistakes that we’re talking about in the case of payment error rates are exactly that — they’re errors.”
More importantly, implementing changes that systemically lower the error rate takes time, which the current fee deadline doesn’t allow for.
“Given the size and scale of the program, the number of applications that are being processed all the time, putting in place the process improvements, the additional staffing, the additional training, system changes — those things take time to bear fruit,” Waide said. “It’s not something you can just lower overnight.”
Any buffers would be added to the 2026 Farm Bill. The House of Representatives passed its version in April 2026, but the Senate’s version is still in committee.
Alabama Senator Katie Britt said in a statement to local Alabama station WBRC: “Senator Britt and her team are in constant communication with local leaders across the state to ensure that those eligible for SNAP benefits receive them without disruption and that the state’s payment error rate is properly addressed. Senator Britt does not sit on the Senate Agriculture Committee and therefore will have no opportunity to offer amendments to the farm bill until it advances to the Senate floor.”
Sen. Tuberville, who sits on the Senate Agriculture Committee and is currently the Republican nominee in the Alabama gubernatorial election, did not respond to a request for comment from Moneywise.
You May Also Like
- JP Morgan sees gold hitting $6,000/oz before 2027 — and a Gold IRA lets you hold the physical metal while deferring the tax bill. Get your free guide from Priority Gold
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and the simple steps to fix it ASAP
- Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
- Millionaires under 43 are reshaping investing — just 25% of their portfolios are in stocks. Here’s where their money is going
Paul Kim is a Brooklyn-based freelance writer and editor. He has spent much of his career in service journalism, helping readers make smart decisions, whether they’re looking for the best pet insurance or a great place to grab lunch.
