Conflict is common in the time leading up to and immediately after a death.
In fact, around 57% of families in the U.S. report having arguments as a loved one’s final breath draws near. These conflicts may center on medical issues, like whether to seek hospice care, but can also be financial.
For example, say Hannah discovered her cousin Olivia cleared out her grandmother’s safe deposit box the week before the family matriarch’s death. Now, Hannah is left wondering what was in the box and what her rights are. Fortunately, experts say that Hannah has legal options.
Thanks for subscribing!
Take control — get our free newsletter.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
Did Olivia have the right to clear out the safe deposit box?
Olivia may have acted improperly, but strict rules govern these situations for good reason.
“One important issue is whether the grandmother’s last will and testament may have been in the safe deposit box,” Asher Rubinstein, partner at Gallet Dreyer & Berkey, LLP, told Moneywise. “A court usually must approve access to a safe deposit box so that the contents are preserved, and someone like the cousin wouldn’t be able to walk away with them.”
That’s not what happened because Olivia ensured it wasn’t.
“The timing of the safe deposit box being emptied raises some important questions,” Fred Taylor, an elder law attorney and founder of Bush & Taylor, told Moneywise. “Was it done with your grandmother’s permission? Was anything in the box supposed to pass to the estate or to specific heirs?”
Those questions must be answered because Olivia may have violated the law.
“If it’s determined that your grandmother was incapacitated before her death and your cousin took the items from the safe deposit box during that time without proper authority, that would certainly raise the kind of financial exploitation concern elder law attorneys investigate,” Taylor said.
Of course, access to safe deposit boxes is restricted, but even if Olivia had a key, this doesn’t mean she acted appropriately.
“Her ability to access the box doesn’t establish ownership of its contents,” Scott Rahn, a probate attorney and founding partner of RMO, LLP, told Moneywise. “State law determines who may access a box and what probate procedures must be followed. But no state treats mere access as automatic ownership.”
Olivia’s actions may have gone beyond tampering with the estate. She potentially violated criminal law. Rubinstein said if Hannah is a beneficiary of her grandmother’s estate, “she may have a valid claim that the cousin’s emptying of the safe deposit box was a criminal act.”
Must Read
- Jeff Bezos backs a platform that lets anyone invest in rental homes for as little as $100 — 6 ways to build wealth like a landlord without actually being one
- The tax breaks in Trump's 'big beautiful bill' expire after 2028. Here are 4 moves to make before the window closes
What can Hannah do about it?
Since Olivia’s behavior was questionable at best and illegal at worst, Hannah has plenty of options.
“Depending on the evidence and applicable state law, the estate or beneficiaries may seek an emergency injunction, an accounting, return of the property, damages, and, in an appropriate case, financial elder abuse, theft, or fraud remedies,” Rahn said.
Rubinstein recommended that Hannah “go to court and begin a proceeding based on a third party holding assets belonging to the grandmother’s estate,” as “the cousin should have inventoried the contents of the safe deposit box in the presence of a bank employee.” He believes “the fact that the cousin didn’t do this suggests that she acted secretly and improperly.”
Stefanie L. DeMario-Germershausen, a partner at Angiuli & Gentile LLP, agreed, advising that Hannah first “get herself appointed as executor or administrator so she has legal standing,” then “bring a turnover proceeding, which is how an estate recovers property that ended up in the wrong hands.”
According to DeMario-Germershausen, the cousin may be “compelled to testify under oath about what she removed and why,” while Taylor indicated that the bank should provide information like access records and details on whether Olivia was an authorized signer.
Of course, even if she was acting under a power of attorney, DeMario-Germershausen explains that Olivia still “owed your grandmother a duty of loyalty and can be forced to account for every item. If she claims it was a gift, the burden is on her to prove it, and a transfer made the week before death is suspect.”
If the court finds that Olivia took property belonging to the estate, DeMario-Germershausen said she may be ordered to return it. Once that’s done, the assets can be distributed based on the grandmother’s wishes, so Hannah should get any assets due to her.
Olivia may still inherit all that her grandmother wanted her to, but she could also face serious legal trouble because of how she handled the whole affair.
You May Also Like
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and 3 simple steps to fix it ASAP
- A single line on your car insurance policy could be inflating your premium by up to 30% — here's what to change
Christy Bieber has 15 years of experience as a personal finance and legal writer. She has written for many publications including Forbes, Kilplinger, CNN, WSJ, Credit Karma, Insurify and more.
