Molly Cantillon had more going on than she could keep track of. So instead of downloading a productivity app or making another doomed to-do list, the 22-year-old tech founder handed the problem to AI.
Cantillon gave Claude Code access to her emails, bank accounts, investments and other personal information, then asked it to help run her day-to-day life.
“All I had to do was give it every bit of data about my life,” Cantillon wrote in The Free Press, describing how the system began building helpers to take on tasks for her.
Thanks for subscribing!
Take control — get our free newsletter.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
With access to that information, Cantillon began using Claude to create a network of specialized AI tools that could handle different pieces of her life, from administrative busywork to her finances.
Putting AI to work
Once Cantillon had her digital assistants up and running, she gave Claude a job most people would probably rather avoid themselves: figuring out where her money was disappearing.
It combed through transactions across her credit cards and flagged recurring charges, including gym memberships, Netflix and other subscriptions that are easy to sign up for and even easier to forget about.
“It pulled all of my transactions across all of my credit cards and when it found repetitive subscriptions, it would ask me, “Hey, is this something that you use?” And I would say yes or no,” she wrote.
If the answer was no, Claude would draft an email asking the company to cancel the subscription. The experiment started paying off almost immediately.
“On day one, I got $700 back. This is absurd,” Cantillon wrote.
Considering Claude Code cost her $20 a month, she said the math was pretty easy: the tool had already paid for itself and then some.
That’s one use case where having a digital assistant digging through your finances might actually come in handy.
A 2026 Self Financial survey found nearly 60% of Americans had at least one paid subscription they weren’t using. On average, those forgotten charges were costing them $26.79 a month, more than $320 over the course of a year.
Must Read
- Jeff Bezos backs a platform that lets anyone invest in rental homes for as little as $100 — 6 ways to build wealth like a landlord without actually being one
- The tax breaks in Trump's 'big beautiful bill' expire after 2028. Here are 4 moves to make before the window closes
Claude the advisor
Cantillon says Claude now plays a role in managing her personal finances, pulling information from brokerages and scanning everything from company filings and headlines to hedge fund disclosures, Polymarket odds and posts on X.
“My personal finances are now managed by Claude Code,” she wrote. “Overnight it picks the locks of brokerages that refuse to talk to each other.”
By morning, she says Claude has turned all of that information into a personalized portfolio briefing, flagging potential opportunities to buy or sell.
That may sound convenient, but this is also where a wrong answer can get expensive. AI tools can produce inaccurate or misleading information, and Americans are still split on how much they trust them with financial advice.
A 2026 NerdWallet survey found 45% of Americans said they would trust an AI chatbot to give them good personal-finance advice. Among those who had actually acted on financial advice from an AI chatbot, 29% said it had made their financial situation worse.
Surrendering with caution
Cantillon’s experiment shows just how much AI can take off your plate. But handing an assistant that much access also raises an obvious question: what happens when something goes wrong?
“Simply having trust in a certain AI product is not a good enough reason to hand over sensitive financial information,” Simpson told Moneywise. “Consumers must always consider how these platforms deal with consumer protections, security controls and how easy it is to revoke access.”
At a minimum, Simpson says consumers should look for strong authentication, clear permission controls and systems that limit how much access an AI assistant actually gets. If the tool can make purchases or move money, she says it should require confirmation before completing sensitive or high-value actions.
For Cantillon, though, giving AI more responsibility has also given her something harder to quantify: more of her time back. She says she’s used it to read a novel in one sitting, call her grandparents more often and go for runs — small victories that come with a much bigger caveat as AI becomes more capable.
“We are early on a big open secret. Govern yourself accordingly,” she wrote.
Moneywise reached out to Cantillon for comment on how she continues to use AI and whether building NOX has changed the way she thinks about how much autonomy people should give AI assistants, but did not hear back before publication.
You May Also Like
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and 3 simple steps to fix it ASAP
- A single line on your car insurance policy could be inflating your premium by up to 30% — here's what to change
Victoria Vesovski is a Toronto-based staff reporter at Moneywise covering personal finance, lifestyle and trending news. She holds degrees from the University of Toronto and New York University, and her work has appeared on platforms including Yahoo Finance, MSN Money and Apple News.
