Would you rather take it easy and float on your back to get down the river, or spend a ton of energy doing the breaststroke to get to there?
If you picked a nice float down the river, passive investing might be for you.
And you aren’t alone. S&P Dow Jones Indices CEO told CNBC in 2021 they found that hands-off investors have saved close to $360 billion.
How does passive investing work?
Passive investing is an investment stragey where the investor doesn’t do a lot of fiddling with trades and they don’t go digging for diamonds in the rough; a set-it-and-forget-it strategy. An investor creates a diversified portfolio — usually imitating a stock market index, like the S&P 500 — and sit on it for the long haul.
The goal with passive investing is to match the market’s returns, not beat it. After all, the S&P 500 has provided an average annual return of about 10% over the past half century. That’s pretty impressive.
Must Read
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and the simple steps to fix it ASAP
- Robert Kiyosaki begs investors not to miss this ‘explosion’ — says this 1 asset will surge 400% in a year
- Vanguard reveals what could be coming for U.S. stocks, and it’s raising alarm bells for retirees. Here’s why and how to protect yourself
Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.
Passive vs. active investing
Passive investing
Since there’s so little trading involved, passive investing is a much easier way for beginners to invest. Yet there’s plenty of evidence that it’s also more profitable than active investing.
S&P Dow Jones Indices — the people who decide which companies go in the Dow Jones and S&P 500, among other things — estimates that passive investing has saved people $357 billion in management fees over the last 25 years.
And that’s only for assets linked to the S&P 500, 400 and 600 indices. There are plenty more out there.
All of those fees are supposed to bring active investors better performance — but the company says that over the past two decades, 94% of U.S. investment managers have failed to beat the S&P 500’s returns.
“As indexing has grown, investors have benefited substantially by saving on fees and avoiding underperformance,” Anu Ganti, S&P Dow Jones’ senior director of index investment strategy, wrote in a recent blog post.
Active investing
Active investing, on the other hand, is what many people think of when you talk about trading. It means you — or the people running your actively managed funds — are trying to make predictions in order to buy low, sell high and get the best return.
It’s a difficult job. It requires knowledge, skill, patience and a lot of work to try to beat the market. Plus, all of the trading involved can mean lots of fees, and if you’re getting experts to make the decisions, those people need to be paid.
Warren Buffett on passive investing
“I recommend the S&P 500 index fund and have for a long, long time to people,” Warren Buffett, one of the world’s most successful investors, said at the annual general meeting of his company Berkshire Hathaway in May.
Buffett has long pushed index funds as the best option for most investors — even his own family. He has instructed the trustee in charge of his estate to invest 90% of his cash into the S&P 500 on behalf of his wife when he dies.
The true cost of investing fees
The average expense ratio of actively managed equity mutual funds was 0.71%, according to a 2020 analysis from the Investment Company Institute. As for index funds? Their ratios fell to 0.06%.
It may not seem like a dramatic difference, but it can cost you a pretty penny over the years.
Say you took $20,000 and put half in an index fund with an annual fee of 0.06% and the other half in an actively managed fund where you’re charged 0.71%. Imagine they both end up returning the S&P 500’s annual average of 10%.
After a decade, your lower-cost fund will be worth about $25,782, while the more expensive fund will only contain about $24,153 — which works out to about $1,629 less.
Another decade later, the fund that charges lower fees will be worth about $8,133 more.
Think of it another way: That’s how much better the actively managed fund needs to perform just to break even with the index fund.
Read More: Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan ‘works every single time’ to kill debt, get rich in America — and that ‘anyone’ can do it
How to get started passive investing
You can get into index funds any number of ways — through your 401(k) at work, a mutual fund company, a discount broker — but the quick and easy route is to use one of today’s popular investing apps.
If you want to go really passive, sign up for a platform that automatically invests your money to create a diversified portfolio.
And if you do decide to go the active route, consider using an app that charges zero commission so you can hold on to more of your money.
It’s not often the lazy approach is the most direct path to success. So why not grab a cold beverage and make the most of it right away?
You May Also Like
- Turning 50 with $0 saved for retirement? Most people don’t realize they’re actually just entering their prime earning decade. Here are 6 ways to catch up fast
- This 20-year-old lotto winner refused $1M in cash and chose $1,000/week for life. Now she’s getting slammed for it. Which option would you pick?
- Warren Buffett used these 8 repeatable money rules to turn $9,800 into a $150B fortune. Start using them today to get rich (and stay rich)
- Here are 5 easy ways to own multiple properties like Bezos and Beyoncé. You can start with $10 (and no, you don’t have to manage a single thing)
Sigrid is a senior associate editor on the Moneywise team, where she has also worked as a reporter and staff writer.
Mortgages • Feb 17
First-time home buyer programs
Mortgages • Feb 15
