SPY +0.77%
BND +0.09%
QQQ +1.61%
DIA +0.05%
VNQ -0.93%
GLD +0.97%
BTC +1.03%
AAPL +0.69%
GOOGL +2.22%
NVDA +1.60%
MSFT -0.52%
META -1.42%
AMZN +1.61%
TSLA +4.69%
UBER -0.56%
GS +2.85%
BAC +0.44%
JPM +0.70%
BRK.A -1.15%
COST -2.05%
XOM -1.98%
BABA +0.96%
WMT -1.45%
SPCX +1.16%
DIS -0.39%
F +2.07%
  • Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Investing Basics
Luiz Inácio Lula Da Silva, incumbent president of Brazil, waves a Brazil flag during a rally Alexandre Schneider /Getty Images

Brazil ETF took in $4.09B in 3 weeks as a bet on one candidate. Then it sank nearly 20% in just one day — protect your portfolio in election season

The iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (NYSE:EWZ) was one of the hottest trades ahead of Brazil’s presidential election, as investors bet on a victory for business-friendly candidate Flávio Bolsonaro. But the trade unraveled on Oct. 26, after President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva pulled off an upset victory in Sunday’s runoff.

EWZ, which tracks an index of large- and mid-sized Brazilian companies, attracted $4.09 billion in net inflows between Oct. 1 and Oct. 23, equivalent to nearly 30% of its assets under management, according to ETF.com and FactSet data.

Advertisement

The fund drew $1.66 billion in the week ending Oct. 16 alone, as investors piled into Brazilian stocks following Bolsonaro’s narrow lead in the first round of voting on Oct. 4. EWZ surged 12.5% the following day, its biggest jump since March 2020.

Invest smarter with our free newsletter.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Lula ultimately prevailed with 51.8% of the runoff vote, compared with Bolsonaro’s 48.2%. EWZ closed down 19.8% on Oct. 26, its second-worst decline since the fund launched in 2000. In intra-day trading, it was down as much as 26%.

The results again showed the limits of crowd forecasts. According to The Rio Times, Bolsonaro led Lula in 39 of 45 national runoff polls, while prediction market Kalshi gave him a more than 80% chance of winning just one day before the vote.

The surprise outcome triggered a broad selloff. The country’s benchmark Bovespa index plunged 13.9%, while the Brazilian real fell more than 11% against the U.S. dollar, its steepest intraday decline in more than two decades. Government bonds also faced heavy selling pressure, prompting Brazil’s Treasury to cancel scheduled bond auctions.

The selloff reflected concerns about Brazil’s fiscal outlook under Lula’s fourth term. Mauricio Monge, a Latin America economist at Oxford Economics, wrote in a report that Lula’s biggest challenge will be convincing investors “he can deliver a credible, sustainable fiscal adjustment while prioritizing real wage growth and employment.”

Risky bets on candidates

Brazil’s market reaction highlights the risks of making bets based on a particular election outcome. History also shows that the initial market reaction to an election doesn’t always last.

When Donald Trump unexpectedly won the 2016 U.S. presidential election, S&P 500 futures plunged 5% overnight, triggering trading limits. However, by the following afternoon, markets had recovered sharply, with the S&P 500 rallying 1.1% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average gaining 1.4% as investors considered the potential benefits of tax cuts, deregulation and infrastructure spending.

Brazil experienced something similar when Lula first won the presidency in 2002. As the International Monetary Fund reported, fears about his economic policies contributed to capital outflows and a 60% decline in the real between April and October that year. But financial markets eventually improved as Lula pursued more conventional economic policies and the Brazilian economy performed better than expected.

And Brazil markets on Oct. 27 recovered a bit from the previous day, with the real rising around 2% against the dollar and the benchmark index up around 1%. EWZ ended the day up 0.44%.

Advertisement

These examples demonstrate why investors should distinguish between an immediate political shock and longer-term changes in economic conditions. Vanguard research also found no meaningful difference in stock-and-bond portfolio returns between U.S. presidential election years and other years.

A diversified portfolio can reduce the risk of betting too heavily on a single market. Although EWZ invests in dozens of Brazilian companies, many of them are affected by the same political and economic developments. Investors who own several international funds or country-specific ETFs should also check whether their holdings overlap.

Must Read

Could the U.S. midterms trigger a similar market reaction?

Brazil’s election shock comes just days before the U.S. midterm elections on Nov. 3, with several polling models suggesting Democrats could gain control of at least one chamber of Congress.

Historical stock market returns suggest the balance of power in Washington could affect investors. Research from retirement planning platform Retirement Researcher found that the S&P 500 averaged annual returns of 7.33% under Republican presidents with a divided Congress, compared with 14.52% when Republicans controlled both the White House and Congress and 14.01% under unified Democratic control.

Jeffrey Buchbinder, chief equity strategist at LPL Financial, has pointed to a more encouraging trend: The S&P 500 has historically gained an average of 17.2% in the year following midterm elections, outperforming every other year of the presidential election cycle, he told Kiplinger.

You May Also Like

Share this:
Sam Bourgi Contributing Writer

Sam Bourgi is a US based financial markets specialist with over a decade of experience covering investing, economics and digital assets. His work has been cited by Congress, the DOJ, the Bank for International Settlements, Bloomberg, Reuters, CNBC, Fox and Newsweek, as well as academic institutions.

more from Sam Bourgi

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.