The iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (NYSE:EWZ) was one of the hottest trades ahead of Brazil’s presidential election, as investors bet on a victory for business-friendly candidate Flávio Bolsonaro. But the trade unraveled on Oct. 26, after President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva pulled off an upset victory in Sunday’s runoff.
EWZ, which tracks an index of large- and mid-sized Brazilian companies, attracted $4.09 billion in net inflows between Oct. 1 and Oct. 23, equivalent to nearly 30% of its assets under management, according to ETF.com and FactSet data.
The fund drew $1.66 billion in the week ending Oct. 16 alone, as investors piled into Brazilian stocks following Bolsonaro’s narrow lead in the first round of voting on Oct. 4. EWZ surged 12.5% the following day, its biggest jump since March 2020.
Thanks for subscribing!
Invest smarter with our free newsletter.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
Lula ultimately prevailed with 51.8% of the runoff vote, compared with Bolsonaro’s 48.2%. EWZ closed down 19.8% on Oct. 26, its second-worst decline since the fund launched in 2000. In intra-day trading, it was down as much as 26%.
The results again showed the limits of crowd forecasts. According to The Rio Times, Bolsonaro led Lula in 39 of 45 national runoff polls, while prediction market Kalshi gave him a more than 80% chance of winning just one day before the vote.
The surprise outcome triggered a broad selloff. The country’s benchmark Bovespa index plunged 13.9%, while the Brazilian real fell more than 11% against the U.S. dollar, its steepest intraday decline in more than two decades. Government bonds also faced heavy selling pressure, prompting Brazil’s Treasury to cancel scheduled bond auctions.
The selloff reflected concerns about Brazil’s fiscal outlook under Lula’s fourth term. Mauricio Monge, a Latin America economist at Oxford Economics, wrote in a report that Lula’s biggest challenge will be convincing investors “he can deliver a credible, sustainable fiscal adjustment while prioritizing real wage growth and employment.”
Risky bets on candidates
Brazil’s market reaction highlights the risks of making bets based on a particular election outcome. History also shows that the initial market reaction to an election doesn’t always last.
When Donald Trump unexpectedly won the 2016 U.S. presidential election, S&P 500 futures plunged 5% overnight, triggering trading limits. However, by the following afternoon, markets had recovered sharply, with the S&P 500 rallying 1.1% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average gaining 1.4% as investors considered the potential benefits of tax cuts, deregulation and infrastructure spending.
Brazil experienced something similar when Lula first won the presidency in 2002. As the International Monetary Fund reported, fears about his economic policies contributed to capital outflows and a 60% decline in the real between April and October that year. But financial markets eventually improved as Lula pursued more conventional economic policies and the Brazilian economy performed better than expected.
And Brazil markets on Oct. 27 recovered a bit from the previous day, with the real rising around 2% against the dollar and the benchmark index up around 1%. EWZ ended the day up 0.44%.
These examples demonstrate why investors should distinguish between an immediate political shock and longer-term changes in economic conditions. Vanguard research also found no meaningful difference in stock-and-bond portfolio returns between U.S. presidential election years and other years.
A diversified portfolio can reduce the risk of betting too heavily on a single market. Although EWZ invests in dozens of Brazilian companies, many of them are affected by the same political and economic developments. Investors who own several international funds or country-specific ETFs should also check whether their holdings overlap.
Must Read
- Jeff Bezos backs a platform that lets anyone invest in rental homes for as little as $100 — 6 ways to build wealth like a landlord without actually being one
- The tax breaks in Trump's 'big beautiful bill' expire after 2028. Here are 4 moves to make before the window closes
Could the U.S. midterms trigger a similar market reaction?
Brazil’s election shock comes just days before the U.S. midterm elections on Nov. 3, with several polling models suggesting Democrats could gain control of at least one chamber of Congress.
Historical stock market returns suggest the balance of power in Washington could affect investors. Research from retirement planning platform Retirement Researcher found that the S&P 500 averaged annual returns of 7.33% under Republican presidents with a divided Congress, compared with 14.52% when Republicans controlled both the White House and Congress and 14.01% under unified Democratic control.
Jeffrey Buchbinder, chief equity strategist at LPL Financial, has pointed to a more encouraging trend: The S&P 500 has historically gained an average of 17.2% in the year following midterm elections, outperforming every other year of the presidential election cycle, he told Kiplinger.
You May Also Like
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and 3 simple steps to fix it ASAP
- A single line on your car insurance policy could be inflating your premium by up to 30% — here's what to change
Sam Bourgi is a US based financial markets specialist with over a decade of experience covering investing, economics and digital assets. His work has been cited by Congress, the DOJ, the Bank for International Settlements, Bloomberg, Reuters, CNBC, Fox and Newsweek, as well as academic institutions.
