Investors versus infants

The study, Selling Fast and Buying Slow, analyzed the history of 783 portfolios owned by both wealthy individuals and institutional clients like pension funds.

The professional investors in charge of those portfolios are serious bigshots, overseeing an average value of about $573 million each.

To judge how well the elite investors performed, researchers compared the results of their acquisitions and sales to the results of randomly selected alternatives — the most brainless strategy they could come up with.

The pros blew the random selection away when it came to their acquisitions. On average, these master investors’ stock picks outperform by 1.2 percentage points. That small margin matters a whole lot when millions are on the line and you factor in the power of compounding.

As for their sales? Well, let’s just say the point-happy baby should be taking calls from BlackRock right now.

Opting for a completely randomized selection would have enriched their clients’ portfolios by 0.8 percentage points over a year.

Join Masterworks to invest in works by Banksy, Picasso, Kaws, and more. Use our special link to skip the waitlist and join an exclusive community of art investors.

Skip waitlist

Human nature trumps investing genius

The reason why is simple psychology that affects even the best of us.

The study’s title is a reference to a book by Nobel Prize-winning psychologist Daniel Kanneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow. The book suggests that brains work in one of two ways: deliberately and rationally or automatically and instinctively.

When investors are buying, they’re much more likely to stop, focus and make truly strategic decisions. After all, that’s where all the glory is: buying an obscure stock that later skyrockets. They also tend to pay closer attention to stocks they actually own.

Investors don’t put the same thought and care into selling, which is more likely to be an instinctive reaction to some negative event. And once a stock is sold, investors tend to stop paying attention to it, so they won’t notice if they made a mistake and dumped a real winner.

“Extensive interviews suggest that they appear to focus primarily on finding the next great idea to add to their portfolio and view selling largely as a way to raise cash for purchases,” the authors write.

What’s the takeaway?

So then, if these highly paid eggheads — the kind that drive sports cars and take monthly trips to Bali — are missing the mark, what’s the right move for an ordinary investor?

Well, you could try to be more aware of your biases, pause before every sale and eliminate trading fees with a zero-commission investing app. Or you could just avoid selling whenever possible.

The Oracle of Omaha himself, Warren Buffett, is a huge proponent of the “buy and hold” approach, joking that his favorite holding period is “forever.” He’s held onto his stock in Coca-Cola and American Express for around 30 years.

No matter how awful things look on a particular day or week, consider holding because suffering stocks often make back their losses and then some. The S&P 500 index rebounded rapidly after the pandemic hit, doubling its performance in just 354 trading days.

You can take a more passive approach to investing by building a diversified portfolio, either on your own or with the help of a robo-advisor.

From there, hold tight and keep your eye on your long-term goals. With passive investing, you don’t need to predict where your stocks are headed. The right time to sell is simply whenever you need the money.

Fine art as an investment

Stocks can be volatile, cryptos make big swings to either side, and even gold is not immune to the market’s ups and downs.

That’s why if you are looking for the ultimate hedge, it could be worthwhile to check out a real, but overlooked asset: fine art.

Contemporary artwork has outperformed the S&P 500 by a commanding 174% over the past 25 years, according to the Citi Global Art Market chart.

And it’s becoming a popular way to diversify because it’s a real physical asset with little correlation to the stock market.

On a scale of -1 to +1, with 0 representing no link at all, Citi found the correlation between contemporary art and the S&P 500 was just 0.12 during the past 25 years.

Earlier this year, Bank of America investment chief Michael Harnett singled out artwork as a sharp way to outperform over the next decade — due largely to the asset’s track record as an inflation hedge.

Investing in art by the likes of Banksy and Andy Warhol used to be an option only for the ultrarich. But with a new investing platform, you can invest in iconic artworks just like Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates do.

About the Author

Sigrid Forberg

Sigrid Forberg


Sigrid is a reporter with MoneyWise. Before joining the team, she worked for a B2B publication in the hardware and home improvement industry and ran an internal employee magazine for the federal government. As a graduate of the Carleton University Journalism program, she takes pride in telling informative, engaging and compelling stories.

What to Read Next


The content provided on MoneyWise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter.