A Minnesota widow says she was left stunned after discovering her credit card had been hit with more than one thousand unauthorized transactions — most of them small, repetitive charges that quietly accumulated over the span of just three days.
“I thought the rules were that if it wasn’t you, it wasn’t you,” said Lisa, 66, who asked that her last name not be used, in an interview with The Washington Post.
What began as a single fraud alert quickly turned into a much larger dispute that stretched over months. By the time she pulled the full statements together, the scale of it became clearer.
Thanks for subscribing!
Read the best of Moneywise in 5 minutes or less.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
Her account showed more than 1,700 unauthorized charges, spread across 32 pages, most of them repeated transactions to the same vendor.
What she didn’t anticipate, however, was the prolonged back-and-forth with the bank over what actually happened on her account, and who should be responsible for reversing the transactions.
A $2.19 alert that turned into nearly 1,700 charges
Back in March, Lisa got a text from Citibank alerting her to a small suspicious charge: just $2.19 from Apple.com on her Costco-branded Visa card. At the time, neither she nor the bank thought it was necessary to cancel the card.
But over a three-day span that month, the activity escalated dramatically. In total, her statements later showed more than 1,700 unauthorized charges. The majority were for $4.38, with roughly a dozen smaller charges of $2.19, adding up to nearly $8,000 in disputed transactions.
Citibank told her it was investigating. Apple, meanwhile, confirmed two legitimate purchases on the account, but had no record of the smaller transactions.
Then came a letter from Citibank which said that, after reviewing the account, it had concluded she “provided the merchant(s) with [her] account information,” and that the $7,816.65 in charges would “remain” on her account.
Lisa pushed back immediately. “I called Citibank, explicitly stated that none of these hundreds of charges were mine, and spent over an hour with the fraud department representative,” she told The Washington Post. “I live alone. I don’t play games. There is no kid in my house downloading games.”
Over time, she escalated the complaint to the Minnesota Attorney General’s Office, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and senior Citibank executives. She also kept detailed records of every call, including dates and the names of representatives she spoke with.
Citibank later said its fraud team had made multiple attempts to reach her, which it said contributed to delays in the case. Lisa disputes this, according to the Post, saying she always answers calls, even from unknown numbers. “I answer my phone no matter if I know the phone number or not,” she said.
Eventually, after what Citibank described as a “comprehensive reevaluation,” the bank agreed to reverse the charges tied to Apple.com purchases, “along with applicable interest adjustments.”
However, Lisa told the Post she remains uneasy about another line in the notice, which states: “The security investigation can take up to 90 days to complete... If you do not hear from us after 90 days, the credits will become permanent.”
Moneywise reached out to Citibank for comment. A Citi spokesperson said the case has been resolved and the outcome communicated directly to the customer. “We are committed to helping our customers protect their accounts and stand behind our $0 liability promise on unauthorized charges,” the company said. They added that customers who suspect fraudulent activity should contact Citi immediately.
Must Read
- The ultra-rich use these 5 real estate strategies to build wealth while they sleep — you can start with just $100
- Here’s the average income of Americans by age in 2026. Are you keeping up or falling behind?
- Insurance companies profit most from drivers who auto-renew without shopping around. Comparing 100+ quotes takes 2 minutes and costs nothing
Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.
What consumer protections apply — and how to dispute fraud
Cases like Lisa’s act as a reminder that credit card fraud doesn’t have to involve big purchases to do serious damage. In this instance, it was a steady stream of tiny charges that eventually added up to thousands of dollars.
The Nilson Report estimates global card fraud losses reached $33.41 billion in 2024, with nearly half of that (42%) tied to the U.S.
Consumers do have protections in place, but they depend on how quickly the issue is caught. If something looks off, even a single small charge, it’s usually safest to contact the bank right away and request a card freeze or replacement before more transactions are posted.
Under federal rules, cardholders generally aren’t responsible for unauthorized charges as long as they’re reported in time. If a card is lost or stolen and used before it’s reported, liability is usually capped at $50, though in practice most major credit card companies end up absorbing the loss entirely under zero-liability policies.
But what catches most people off guard is the timing. Most disputes need to be filed within about 60 days of the statement date, and once that window closes, it can become harder to reverse charges or lean on the same protections.
When something does go wrong, the Federal Trade Commission recommends putting everything in writing, listing the charges clearly, sending documentation by certified mail, and keeping proof of delivery. It sounds a bit formal, but it’s often what keeps things moving when phone calls and follow-ups are going nowhere.
If a bank isn’t resolving the issue, consumers can escalate it to regulators like the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau or their state attorney general’s office, like Lisa did after weeks of going back and forth with her bank.
Even then, resolution isn’t always quick or straightforward, and communication can slow down once a case moves into a formal investigation.
And once a dispute is eventually resolved, the process itself can still feel drawn out. A 90-day investigation window, in particular, can leave consumers in a long stretch of uncertainty, even after the issue has already been flagged and reported.
For many consumers, the frustration isn’t just the fraud itself, it’s how long it can take for certainty to catch up with it.
You May Also Like
- JP Morgan sees gold hitting $6,000/oz before 2027 — and a Gold IRA lets you hold the physical metal while deferring the tax bill. Get your free guide from Priority Gold
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and the simple steps to fix it ASAP
- Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
- Millionaires under 43 are reshaping investing — just 25% of their portfolios are in stocks. Here’s where their money is going
Laura Grande is a freelance contributor with nearly 15 years of industry experience. Throughout her career she's written about and edited a range of topics, from personal finance and politics to health and pop culture.
