The roofs at the Villa Moura condo complex in San Clemente, California aren’t leaking — at least, that’s what residents say. But their HOA insists on charging all 198 owners more than $26,000 each to replace them anyway, and nobody got a vote.
The board declared the roofs an emergency, and under California law, that one word can let an HOA charge its members big money without asking them first, KABC-TV reported.
Anyone who doesn’t pay has been warned the association could slap a lien on their home.
Thanks for subscribing!
Your real estate market edge, for free.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
But some owners aren’t having it at all. They’ve filed a claim accusing the board of breaking the law, they’re organizing to recall board members and they’re talking about suing.
The 5% rule and the emergency exception
Luckily for owners, California caps what a board can charge on its own. Under Civil Code Section 5605, special assessments can’t add up to more than 5% of the association’s budgeted gross expenses for the year without a vote of the members. The cap is a yearly total, so a board can’t get around it by splitting one big charge into smaller ones.
Section 5610 does let a board skip that vote in an emergency, but it recognizes only three: a court orders the association to pay for something, the board finds a danger to residents’ safety on the property or a major repair or maintenance cost turns up that nobody could have planned for at budget time.
According to MBK Chapman, a California law firm that represents homeowners in disputes with their associations, a board can’t call something an emergency just because it feels urgent — deferred maintenance and poor budgeting don’t count. And if a board skips the vote anyway, the firm warns, the assessment “may be unenforceable.”
The boards have paperwork to file, too. A board using that unforeseen-cost exception has to pass a resolution laying out in writing why the work is necessary and why it wasn’t predictable, then mail that document to owners along with the bill. Section 5615 buys owners some time, as well, since a new assessment can’t fall due less than 30 days or more than 60 days after the notice goes out.
Must Read
- Jeff Bezos backs a platform that lets anyone invest in rental homes for as little as $100 — 6 ways to build wealth like a landlord without actually being one
- The tax breaks in Trump's 'big beautiful bill' expire after 2028. Here are 4 moves to make before the window closes
Why residents say the ‘emergency’ was years in the making
The Villa Moura owners say none of that describes what happened at their complex. Residents told KABC their board has been aware for years that the roofs were due for work. What actually needs attention, they say, is the layer beneath the tiles — not the tiles themselves.
“Clearly, it was not an emergency; it’s a deferred maintenance,” homeowner Noah Martin said. “And so, then we as members should have a vote on how we want to take care of the roofs.”
Homeowner Adam Dubin questions how the board handled the contract.
“What we would like to do is have multiple bids competitively submitted and actually negotiate those bids in the best interest of the homeowners,” he said. “As the board should be doing with their fiduciary responsibilities to us.”
Money is a real worry, too. Residents told KABC they expect many of their neighbors to have a hard time paying, and owners have started a GoFundMe for those who can’t.
The board told KABC it could not comment because of ongoing legal matters. Moneywise reached the board through its management company, but the board did not yet respond by publication time.
What you can do if your HOA pulls the same move
If your own HOA ever tries something like this, ask to see the records. Civil Code 5200 gives every member the right to request budgets, reserve studies and board minutes — and if the minutes show the roofs coming up meeting after meeting, the board will have a hard time arguing it couldn’t have seen the expense coming.
From there, the bad news is you’ll need patience. State law pushes both sides to try working it out first. The association has to offer an internal dispute process, and Civil Code 5930 blocks many types of lawsuits until the owner has offered formal mediation or arbitration. And know that Civil Code 5975 makes the losing side pay the winner’s attorney fees — great if your case is strong, but expensive if it isn’t.
Whether or not the move was legal now sits with the owners’ claim — and if their facts hold, California law says the board needed their votes. Getting that answer will take months.
Until then, some owners like Beverly Albright, 81, are planning to move.
“I will have to move,” Albright told KABC. “I’ve worked very hard to make it so that I could be here.”
You May Also Like
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and 3 simple steps to fix it ASAP
- A single line on your car insurance policy could be inflating your premium by up to 30% — here's what to change
Godwin Oluponmile is a content specialist, SEO strategist and copywriter with seven years of expertise in finance, Web 3.0, B2B SaaS and technology. His work has been featured in publications such as Entrepreneur, HackerNoon, Blocktelegraph and Benzinga.
