SPY -0.95%
BND -0.10%
QQQ -0.66%
DIA -1.83%
VNQ -0.13%
GLD -0.90%
BTC -0.59%
AAPL -1.55%
GOOGL -2.35%
NVDA -2.46%
MSFT -1.26%
META +4.03%
AMZN -2.19%
TSLA +2.88%
UBER -3.12%
GS -0.20%
BAC -0.97%
JPM -2.06%
BRK.A -0.21%
COST -0.61%
XOM +1.87%
BABA -1.53%
WMT -1.22%
SPCX +2.34%
DIS -1.04%
F -4.45%
  • Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
Yaroslav Zhelezniak holds a briefing at the Ukrainian Parliament. Volodymyr Tarasov/Ukrinform/Future Publishing via Getty Images

Ukraine floats legalizing porn to raise $25 million a year for its drone war with Russia

Svitlana Dvornikova has a million online subscribers, pays her taxes and has never been convicted of a crime. She also had $200,000 seized from her home by police who offered to return half of it in exchange for a bribe.

That’s life as a Ukrainian OnlyFans creator, where producing adult content is illegal and could lead to seven years in prison. And since bribing the authorities is quite common, these two realities have created a multimillion-dollar corruption machine.

Advertisement

Now, the lucrative industry that the country can’t stop, and also can’t tax, is at the center of a parliamentary debate with direct military implications, according to the Wall Street Journal.

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Yaroslav Zhelezniak, an opposition lawmaker who chairs Ukraine’s parliamentary finance committee, is leading a movement to legalize pornography. His argument: doing so would generate up to $25 million a year in tax revenue — enough, he calculates, to fund 30,000 military drones.

A bill he co-authored passed its first parliamentary vote in July and is now awaiting a second reading.

The legal and financial trap

Ukraine’s porn ban hasn’t quite eliminated the industry as intended. Instead, the ban pushed it underground and abroad, creating plenty of corruption in lieu of generating tax revenue. In an example cited by the WSJ, police departments in three separate Ukrainian regions were each found to be receiving over $20,000 a month in bribes to look the other way.

The scale of the industry became impossible to ignore after Russia’s invasion. OnlyFans’ UK-based parent company, Fenix International, reportedly provided Ukrainian tax authorities with data showing that 7,900 Ukrainians had earned more than $131 million from the platform in 2023 alone — representing millions in unpaid taxes.

When the government began sending tax notices to OnlyFans models, many filed declarations — only to find that doing so effectively constituted a confession to criminal pornography production. Police raids followed.

Officers searched Dvornikova’s home, seizing a laptop, flash drives and the equivalent of $200,000 in cash she’d set aside for taxes. She told the WSJ the officers offered to let her keep half the cash in exchange for a bribe, which she turned down.

Tax lawyer Lesia Mykhalenko, who has represented more than 100 OnlyFans models in Ukraine, told the WSJ, “This is a victimless crime. It unnecessarily burdens the legal system at a time when we should be focused on defending the country.”

Must Read

$25 million in context

For a country spending more than it can raise at home to survive a full-scale war, $25 million is a modest sum. According to Ukraine’s Defense Ministry, as reported by the New Voice of Ukraine, the country requires $120 billion annually to implement its military strategy, with roughly half expected to come from domestic sources and EU loans. The remainder is reportedly dependent on international partners.

Advertisement

And according to the Kyiv Independent, even after securing significant EU funding commitments, Ukraine still faces a substantial defense funding gap this year (around $23.1 billion), with analysts warning a further shortfall could emerge in 2027.

Against that backdrop, $25 million won’t close the gap. But Zhelezniak’s point is more about the principle: money currently flowing to corrupt police and foreign tax authorities could instead be going toward Ukraine’s own defense.

The broader revenue argument

Dvornikova made the same argument directly to President Zelensky in June 2025, submitting a petition that gathered the 25,000 signatures needed to elicit a formal response. Calling herself a “conscientious taxpayer,” she told the WSJ she’d paid 40 million hryvnias — about $900,000 — in taxes, which she calculated was worth 2,000 drones or 100 army pickup trucks.

Zelensky said parliament would consider legalization legislation. Meanwhile, Dvornikova’s criminal case has since been put on hold while parliament deliberates and her money has been returned.

Iryna Mosiychuk, who runs a webcam studio operation in Lviv called Beezone, told the WSJ she currently pays $5,000 a month in taxes — and that the government would collect 20 times that if she were allowed to operate legally and at full scale.

“I don’t want my country to ask other countries for support and weapons,” she said. “If our industry was able to grow, I think we could help Ukraine manage all this on its own.”

You May Also Like

Share this:

With a writing and editing career spanning over 15 years, Emma creates and refines content across a broad spectrum of industries, including personal finance, lifestyle, travel, health & wellness, real estate, beauty & fitness and B2B/SaaS/tech.

more from Emma Caplan-Fisher

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.