AAPL +0.70%
AMZN -0.73%
BABA +2.03%
BAC -0.22%
BND +0.26%
BRK.A +0.11%
BTC -0.92%
COST -1.46%
DIA +0.06%
DIS -0.36%
F -0.65%
GLD -1.21%
GOOGL -1.55%
GS +0.70%
JNJ -0.45%
JPM -0.06%
META +4.15%
MSFT +1.59%
NKE -5.46%
NVDA +1.25%
QQQ +0.53%
SPCX +0.91%
SPY +0.29%
TSLA -1.50%
UBER +0.83%
VNQ -0.04%
WMT -1.98%
XOM -2.31%
  • Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
Tillis and Lutnick C-SPAN/YouTube/Mandel NGAN/Getty Images

The right ‘throat’ to ‘choke’: Prominent GOP senator singles out Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick for tariff chaos

President Trump’s tariff policy is drawing fresh criticism from within his own party, and one Republican senator is putting the blame squarely on Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick.

Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina unloaded on the administration’s trade policy Monday, telling reporters he now knows whose throat he should “choke” after tariffs failed to deliver for American farmers.

Advertisement

“We’ve got 71 days [until the midterm elections], and right now we don’t have a positive message to sell farm country,” Tillis said in remarks shared by Semafor’s Burgess Everett, tracing the trouble back to Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariff rollout in April 2025.

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

“That’s exactly why I asked whose throat I got to choke if Liberation Day failed last year, and it failed,” he said. Nearly 17 months later, Tillis now has his answer: “That person is Howard Lutnick.”

What went wrong?

Lutnick has been one of the central figures behind Trump’s tariff push. As commerce secretary, he has helped negotiate trade deals and repeatedly argued that tariffs will bring manufacturing back to the U.S. and give Washington leverage in trade negotiations.

According to The New York Times, this included making “last-minute demands” that derailed U.S.-Canada trade negotiations last week, prompting Canada to impose retaliatory tariffs on roughly $20 billion of U.S. goods, including dairy, seafood and outdoor equipment.

With the Nov. 3 midterms approaching, Tillis’ warning underscores the challenge Republicans face in making their economic case to agricultural voters amid rising energy prices, an uneven labor market and higher borrowing costs as surging bond yields push up interest rates across the economy.

For Tillis, those voters are close to home.

North Carolina is home to roughly 41,300 farms spread across 8 million acres, according to USDA data. The state is an agricultural heavyweight, particularly in livestock and poultry, with about 7.9 million hogs as of December 2025 and nearly 985 million broiler chickens produced during the year.

Tillis’ criticism therefore carries more weight than a routine intraparty swipe at Trump’s trade team. Tariffs can squeeze farmers in his home state from both directions, raising the cost of imported supplies while leaving U.S. agricultural exports vulnerable to retaliation.

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

Trump’s cheaper beef push has ranchers on edge

As Canada ratchets up its tariff response, the U.S. farm industry is facing another trade-policy dilemma: Trump is temporarily lowering barriers to foreign beef to bring down grocery prices. The push comes as the administration faces broader pressure over food prices, with higher energy costs stemming from the Iran war adding to expenses across the agricultural supply chain.

Advertisement

On Friday, Trump announced that up to 300,000 metric tons of ground beef products could enter the U.S. over the next 90 days without triggering higher tariffs. He said exporters had committed to selling the beef at 25% below current market prices. The administration has yet to specify which countries will supply it.

The move builds on an earlier effort to boost foreign supply. In February, Trump struck a deal allowing Argentina to export an additional 80,000 metric tons of lean beef trimmings to the U.S., as the administration sought to ease surging beef prices that the White House blamed in part on “years of drought and widespread wildfires.”

The latest plan has drawn fierce resistance from cattle producers, including in rural states central to Trump’s political coalition.

“You don’t put America first by putting U.S. cattle producers last,” Justin Tupper, president of the U.S. Cattlemen’s Association, said in a statement after Friday’s announcement. “This move will weaken our markets and gamble with food safety in the process.”

The group had also opposed expanding Argentine imports before the February deal, warning that bringing in more foreign beef could drive down cattle prices and undermine domestic producers.

Tupper’s warning about food safety comes as Argentine beef is already facing scrutiny over an unrelated inspection issue. Earlier this month, Corte Argentino USA, a Florida importer of Argentine beef, recalled 29,628 pounds of raw beef after the products entered the U.S. without required import reinspection. The meat was distributed in Florida and Texas, and no illnesses have been reported.

You May Also Like

Share this:
Sam Bourgi Contributing writer

Sam Bourgi is a financial markets specialist with over a decade of experience covering investing, economics and digital assets. His work has been cited by U.S. Congress, the DOJ, the Bank for International Settlements, Bloomberg, Reuters, CNBC, Fox and Newsweek, as well as academic institutions.

more from Sam Bourgi

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.