President Donald Trump is siding with executives who believe AI giants should police themselves, even as prominent critics sound the alarm that AI companies can’t be relied on to establish their own safeguards while developing technology that could pose a risk to civilization.
Trump had lunch on Tuesday with about 20 of the most prominent chief executives in the AI industry. Among the AI titans in attendance were Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, OpenAI president Greg Brockman, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, Tesla CEO Elon Musk and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg.
“There’s a belief that there should be tremendous self-regulation, and we automatically have regulation with the Department of Justice, the FBI, all of that,” Trump said on Tuesday. “But the self-regulation is very important.”
Thanks for subscribing!
The money news that actually matters.
By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
The president was later asked if he could be persuaded to endorse slowing down AI development or stiffer AI regulations. “I’m seeing tremendous self-policing, and they understand that they have to self-police,” Trump said.
It comes after some AI executives have urged scaling back the speed of AI development. Now Bill Gates, the co-founder of Microsoft and global philanthropist, is joining the growing chorus of voices demanding government intervention.
“Part of the reason I’m speaking so loudly — as loud as I can — is that you can’t rely on the industry to self-regulate here,” Gates told New York Times columnist Ezra Klein in an interview published on Tuesday, before the AI gathering. “I mean, it’s just insane.”
Enormous AI safety concerns
AI development is reaching a pivotal moment. Some policymakers, such as Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, are demanding AI companies pump the brakes on rolling out the nascent technology.
“We should immediately press pause on the development of advanced AI while lawmakers and regulators put systems in place to keep people safe,” she said in a Sept. 16 news release.
OpenAI, Meta and Anthropic have disclosed security breaches in which their AI models hacked other companies or otherwise gained unauthorized access to the internet and internal tools.
For his part, Trump has dismissed concerns that AI will pose a major societal risk. Most notably, he called Huang during a Los Angeles conference to discuss AI and the Nvidia CEO put it on speakerphone.
“It’s a hoax,” Trump told Huang over the phone onstage in mid-September. “The robots are not going to be taking over the world. That’s not going to happen.”
Must Read
- Jeff Bezos backs a platform that lets anyone invest in rental homes for as little as $100 — 6 ways to build wealth like a landlord without actually being one
- The tax breaks in Trump's 'big beautiful bill' expire after 2028. Here are 4 moves to make before the window closes
The future of AI regulation
Don’t count on Congress to enact any new AI rules before the November midterms. There are still major splits among lawmakers in both parties about the appropriate role of the federal government in pausing AI development and the scope of new regulations. Gates, though, believes the government must step in.
“There is no supervisory layer today,” Gates told The New York Times. “That supervisory layer is needed urgently to prevent bad people from using today’s A.I.s to shut down economies or kill millions of people.”
On Tuesday afternoon, Trump signed an executive order that rebranded AI as “Super Intelligence” in government communications and correspondence.
You May Also Like
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and 3 simple steps to fix it ASAP
- A single line on your car insurance policy could be inflating your premium by up to 30% — here's what to change
Joseph Zeballos-Roig is a policy and politics journalist based in Washington D.C with a focus on economics. He is experienced in connecting the significance of events in the capital to the lives of everyday Americans whether its taxes, tariffs, interest rates or federal programs.
