• Discounts and special offers
  • Subscriber-only articles and interviews
  • Breaking news and trending topics

Already a subscriber?

By signing up, you accept Moneywise's Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Not interested ?

Top Stories
Kevin O'Leary attends the 2016 Interbrand Breakthrough Brands Summit. Matthew Eisman/Getty Images

Kevin O'Leary admits he didn't get the messaging right on his Utah data center: 'No interest in causing an environmental disaster on my legacy'

The reaction to Kevin O’Leary’s plans for a massive data center in Utah hasn’t exactly been wonderful.

The Shark Tank star has faced major backlash since he announced plans to build The Stratos Project, touted as the world’s largest data center campus, in a valley near the Great Salt Lake. Public outcry has been fierce and politicians who backed the project have been unseated.

Advertisement

“This Data Center Is Everything That Everyone Hates About AI,” one headline from The New Republic claimed in July.

The money news that actually matters.

By signing up, you accept Moneywise Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Now, O’Leary — aka “Mr. Wonderful” — says his company didn’t adequately communicate plans for the project with Box Elder County residents.

“We really screwed this up,” O’Leary said in an interview with MS NOW. “We have not communicated what we do.”

Data center debacle

O’Leary’s company, O’Leary Digital, announced plans for a data center in Utah’s Hansel Valley, which a press release referred to as “Wonder Valley” after his own nickname, in February of this year.

Resistance to the project arose not only because of its initial proposed scale — 40,000 acres — but because of the speedy approval process, according to a Utah News Dispatch report.

Because the approval process was facilitated by Utah’s Military Installation Development Authority (MIDA), a state development authority, the process “was quicker than regular public processes and allowed little opportunity for community feedback before it was put to a vote by Box Elder County commissioners,” the News Dispatch reported.

After public outcry, Utah’s Senate President Stuart Adams, who is also the chair of MIDA, called on O’Leary to cut the scale of the project by 75%, with O’Leary conceding to cut it back by half, to 20,000 acres, according to the News Dispatch.

But that didn’t appease voters, who ousted Adams in a June primary. His loss was widely reported to be due to the fallout around the data center.

Must Read

Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

O’Leary’s about-face

Opponents to the data center are also concerned about its environmental impact.

Advertisement

Dr. Robert Davies, associate professor of physics at Utah State University, who MS NOW described as “one of the leading critics of the project,” said the project, at its proposed scale, would consume as much power as two states of Utah or three New York Cities.

In a report published before the size of the project was scaled down to 20,000 acres, Davies told The Verge that the heat generated by the site would be “the equivalent of about 23 atom bombs worth of energy dumped into this local environment every single day.”

There’s also concerns that the site would sit near the Great Salt Lake, “which has lost three-quarters of its volume in a few decades,” MS NOW reported. The Stratos Project website says the site would be “powered by its own private gas power plant.”

MS NOW reported that O’Leary “initially lashed out publicly at critics like Davies and others,” but now, has “struck a more conciliatory tone despite ongoing litigation over the project.”

“He told MS NOW he still intends to submit permit applications, which would provide much of the information people are so desperate to see. He said he wants to win over the state,” the report says.

“I have no interest in causing an environmental disaster on my legacy,” O’Leary says in an interview with MS NOW reporter Josh Einiger. “That’s never going to happen.”

Advertisement

Einiger says in the report, however, that when it comes to some of the questions that have riled the community — how the site will generate power, the amount of heat it will give off and the water requirements — O’Leary “just doesn’t know the answers. His engineers [are] still figuring it all out.”

“What we’re going to do to solve for this, because you’re bringing up a valid problem, we have to give them the facts,” O’Leary said in the interview.

O’Leary told MS NOW his company would produce plans for a one GB facility (the current 20,000 acre proposal would use as much as nine gigawatts of power) that show what the heat profile, light, noise and water use would be so that detractors could “extrapolate from this” what the site’s impact would be.

Lights out?

When it comes to his proposed data center, O’Leary admitted to MS NOW’s Einiger, “I got a lot of work ahead of me.” But he didn’t show signs of backing down, either. “Am I going to build this data center? The answer is yes.”

Einiger asked O’Leary, “Are you aware of how people view you in Utah right now, and view this project, personally? I mean, are you aware of how offended a lot of them are by the rhetoric and by the strategy that’s been employed so far to try to get this pushed through?”

O’Leary replied, “It’s a great question. You mean, do I sleep at night? Yeah.”

You May Also Like

Share this:
Rebecca Payne Contributor

Rebecca Payne has more than a decade of experience editing and producing both local and national daily newspapers. She's worked on the Toronto Star, the Globe and Mail, Metro, Canada's National Observer, the Virginian-Pilot and Daily Press.

more from Rebecca Payne

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Moneywise is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither investment, tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities, enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.