May 2, 2026
When Elizabeth Warren took to X in early 2024 to acknowledge the blocked merger between JetBlue Airways and Spirit Airlines, she framed it as a clear consumer victory. She called the decision, which she argued would prevent fares from competition-induced creeping, a "Biden win for flyers." (1)
At the time, the logic aligned with longstanding antitrust concerns: The cutting of competition that comes with corporate consolidation leaves remaining airlines with greater pricing power, which often results in raised fares for consumers.
Advertisement
Those in favor of the merger, however, argued that it would have aided both airlines in their increasingly tenuous efforts to keep costs down. And, as it turns out, Spirit couldn't afford to keep those efforts up.
"Sustaining the business required hundreds of millions of additional dollars of liquidity that Spirit simply does not have and could not procure," Dave Davis, Spirit's President and Chief Executive Officer, said in a press release. (2) "This is tremendously disappointing and not the outcome any of us wanted."
With Spirit Airlines shuttered after more than three decades in operation, the question is: Was the decision to block the JetBlue-Spirit merger really the right one?
The Spirit saga dates back several years
In 2022, JetBlue and Spirit announced that their boards of directors had approved the definitive merger agreement under which JetBlue would acquire Spirit for an aggregate fully diluted equity value of $3.8 billion and an adjusted enterprise value of $7.6 billion. The merger would have created the fifth-largest carrier in the country.
At the time, Robin Hayes, former Chief Executive Officer of JetBlue, said in a press release that Spirit and JetBlue would "continue to advance [their] shared goal of disrupting the industry to bring down fares from the Big Four airlines." (3)
Ted Christie, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Spirit at the time, added that the airline was thrilled to "create the most compelling national low-fare challenger to the dominant U.S. carriers." (3)
The acquisition was also intended to accelerate JetBlue's organic growth plan with more than 1,700 daily flights to over 125 destinations in 30 countries. It would have additionally increased JetBlue's mark on major cities like Fort Lauderdale and Los Angeles, as well as Big Four airline hubs like Las Vegas and Miami. (3)
Advertisement
For Spirit, which had long operated on thin margins, the merger posed a potential lifeline. The airline was under strain from rising costs, operational complexities, and evolving demand patterns. Its business model depended on high volume and cost discipline in an increasingly competitive and volatile industry.
By 2024, however, JetBlue and Spirit mutually agreed to terminate the merger as required closing conditions — such as obtaining the necessary legal and regulatory approvals — were unlikely to be met by the merger agreement's date.
"We believed this merger was worth pursuing because it would have unleashed a national low-fare, high-value competitor to the Big Four airlines," Joanna Geraghty, Chief Executive Officer of JetBlue, disappointingly reiterated in the 2024 press release. (4)
Must Read
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — are you doing the same?
- Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
- Robert Kiyosaki says this 1 asset will surge 400% in a year and begs investors not to miss this ‘explosion’
Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.
Was a merger the right move, after all?
While both airlines insisted over the years that the merger would have empowered consumers with greater access to low-cost airfare, critics like Warren argued that the merger would have been a major mistake.
"I've warned for months that a @JetBlue - @SpiritAirlines merger would have led to fewer flights and higher fares," she posted on X after news of the termination broke. "@JusticeATR and @USDOT were right to stand up for consumers and fight against runaway airline consolidation." (1)
Spirit functioned as an ultra-low-cost carrier, offering bare-bones fares that often undercut competitors. Even travelers who never flew Spirit benefited indirectly; its presence pressured larger airlines to keep prices in check. Regulators, backed by voices like Warren, feared that absorbing Spirit into JetBlue would eliminate that downward pricing force.
With Spirit now out of the market entirely, many fear that the outcome could be worse than the scenario regulators tried to avoid. Instead of a consolidated airline that might have modestly raised prices, the U.S. has lost its most aggressive budget carrier altogether. That could reduce competition more dramatically than a merger ever would have — especially on routes where Spirit was a key low-cost option.
Advertisement
Still, it's not quite fair to draw a straight line from Warren's stance on Spirit's collapse. Antitrust decisions are made based on the information available at the time, and the concern about consolidation in the airline industry is not hypothetical. Today's evolving variables — such as the surge in jet fuel prices as a result of the war in Iran — are only 20/20 in hindsight. From that perspective, the government's intervention was consistent with broader efforts to curb corporate concentration.
"Spiking fuel prices from Trump's war was the nail in the coffin for twice-bankrupted Spirit airline," Warren wrote on X. (5) "FWIW, the JetBlue merger failed because a judge, appointed by Ronald Reagan, said the deal was illegal. Republicans are desperate to shift blame from higher costs hitting families."
The collapse of Spirit Airlines doesn't clearly vindicate poor choices. Instead, it exposes the limits of predicting nuanced market dynamics.
It's possible that a JetBlue-Spirit merger would have raised prices, and it's just as possible that blocking it exacerbated or accelerated Spirit's ultimate demise. Both scenarios carry trade-offs, and only time can ever tell the consequences of any decision — as it will with this one.
For now, major airlines are capping ticket prices specifically for Spirit customers, while others are offering reduced prices and committing to freezing fares on high-volume Spirit routes. (6)
Article Sources
We rely only on vetted sources and credible third-party reporting. For details, see our ethics and guidelines.
X (1),(5),(6); Spirit Restructuring (2); JetBlue (4),(3)
You May Also Like
- Turning 50 with $0 saved for retirement? Most people don’t realize they’re actually just entering their prime earning decade. Here are 6 ways to catch up fast
- Inside a $1B real estate fund offering access to thousands of income-producing rental properties — with flexible minimums starting at $10
- Vanguard’s outlook on U.S. stocks is raising alarm bells for retirees. Here’s why and how to protect yourself
- Here are 5 easy ways to own multiple properties like Bezos and Beyoncé. You can start with $10 (and no, you don’t have to manage a single thing)
AnnaMarie is a weekend editor for Moneywise.
