Musician Cat Stevens (Yusuf) once ruefully sang that the first cut is the deepest, which explains why many Americans are bracing themselves for the fallout of Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE) cutting of the federal budget.
The world’s richest man wants to cut $1 trillion from the federal budget. In a recent Fox News interview, Musk declared that the cuts wouldn't harm essential U.S. services, promising Americans they could have their fiscal cake and eat it, too.
“The government is not efficient,” Musk said. “There’s a lot of waste and fraud. So, we feel confident that a 15 percent reduction can be done without affecting any of the critical government services.”
But as analysts and concerned citizens point out the numbers — and reality — might not add up to Musk's optimism.
Millions of Americans depend on essential services like health care and retirement support, so the coming months may prove critical in determining whether Musk’s actions will deliver prosperity or deepen economic woes.
What does $1 trillion in cuts really mean?
What’s pinching the chain in Musk’s cuts is President Donald Trump’s recent round of tariffs.
The broad-sweeping tariffs, which have been on-again, off-again with varying nations, have driven a wedge between his administration and the Tesla billionaire. Since Inauguration Day, DOGE has spearheaded layoffs across all departments of the federal government, leading to concerns that Musk is moving too fast and endangering services counted on by millions of Americans.
DOGE, and its cuts, have yet to be approved by Congress. But Musk and his team argue that federal spending has ballooned irresponsibly, claiming wasteful expenditures can easily absorb these cuts without hurting Americans' daily lives. Recent events, however, suggest the reality might be more complicated.
Cuts made by DOGE are impacting older adults particularly hard. Social Security offices, a vital resource for retirees managing their benefits, have seen significant staffing cuts, causing online systems to buckle and physical locations to become overwhelmed.
Older Americans — many unfamiliar with digital platforms — now face hurdles to support. Retirees have flooded social media and news outlets venting their frustrations, suggesting Musk’s self-described “revolution” feels more like abandonment.
The cuts have also injected unpredictability into the stock market. Experts suggest Wall Street, already in turmoil over tariffs, might be underestimating the impact of the DOGE cuts, which could reduce consumer confidence.
Must Read
- You can now build wealth like a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to chase down rent or take 3 A.M tenant calls
- Goldman Sachs used to hoard prime real estate deals for the ultrarich. Two ex-analysts just opened the door for $250
- Robert Kiyosaki begs investors not to miss this ‘explosion’ — says this 1 asset will surge 400% in a year
Join 250,000+ readers and get Moneywise’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.
What if Medicare and Medicaid are on the chopping block?
Beyond these immediate impacts lies a deeper concern: Experts warn the math behind Musk’s $1 trillion cuts doesn't add up without significantly scaling back Medicare and Medicaid. They represent nearly a quarter of the federal budget.
If cuts are made to Medicare and Medicaid, millions could find their health coverage compromised or significantly reduced.
Currently, Medicare serves approximately 67 million Americans. Medicaid provides essential healthcare to roughly 72 million low-income individuals, including children, older adults in nursing homes and disabled Americans. Any substantial reduction in these programs would inevitably ripple across communities, straining hospitals and leaving countless families struggling to afford basic medical care.
Health policy experts have sounded the alarm for those reasons. According to a recent Kaiser Family Foundation report, cutting even a small percentage of Medicare or Medicaid could lead to thousands of healthcare facility closures, disproportionately affecting rural and underserved urban areas.
“Any reduction in federal Medicaid spending would leave states with tough choices about how to offset reductions through tax increases or cuts to other programs, like education,” Kaiser Family Foundation analysts concluded in a recent Medicaid brief studying the impacts of proposed Medicaid cuts. “If states are not able to offset the loss of federal funds with new taxes or reductions in other state spending, states would have to make cuts to their Medicaid programs.”
Public reaction
Public skepticism (and incredulity) underscore a fundamental tension between Musk’s economic vision and the gritty realities facing everyday Americans.
Economists widely acknowledge the need for fiscal responsibility and targeted spending cuts. However, Musk’s trillion-dollar gamble highlights crucial trade-offs between government size and service quality, forcing hard conversations about national priorities. As debates rage and details emerge, citizens must remain informed and engaged, understanding exactly what's at stake.
You May Also Like
- Dave Ramsey warns nearly 50% of Americans are making 1 big Social Security mistake — here’s what it is and the simple steps to fix it ASAP
- Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
- Millionaires under 43 are reshaping investing — just 25% of their portfolios are in stocks. Here’s where their money is going
- Robert Kiyosaki issues grim warning for baby boomers. Many could be ‘wiped out’ and homeless ‘all over’ the country. How to protect yourself now
Chris Clark is a Kansas City–based freelance journalist covering personal finance, housing and retirement. A former Associated Press editor and reporter, he writes plainspoken stories that help readers make smarter financial decisions.
